Abstract
Recently, scholars have argued that disclosure of personal information is an effective mechanism for building high-quality relationships. However, personal information can focus attention on differences in demographically diverse teams. In an experiment using 37 undergraduate teams, we examine how sharing personal information by ethnically similar and ethnically distinct newcomers to a team affects team perceptions, performance, and behavior. Our findings indicate that the disclosure of personal information by ethnically distinct newcomers improves team performance. However, the positive impact on team performance comes at a cost to the newcomers, who are perceived as less competent by others and experience heightened social discomfort in team interactions. Ironically, what benefits the ethnically diverse team may undermine its ethnically distinct members. This study highlights how the management of diversity may sometimes require making trade-offs between individual interests and those of the team.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W., & Lindzey, G. (1954). Handbook of social psychology. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–503.
Angst, C. M. (2009). Protect my privacy or support the common-good? Ethical questions about electronic health information exchanges. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 169–178.
Ayoko, O., Hartel, C., Fisher, G., and Fujimoto, Y. (2004). 10 Communication competence in cross-cultural business interactions. In O. Ayoko (Ed.), Key issues in organizational communication (p. 157). Psychology Press.
Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1996). Gender, status, and behavior in task situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 273.
Behfar, K., Kern, M., & Brett, J. (2006). Managing challenges in multicultural teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 9, 233–262.
Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., & Kernahan, C. (1997). Numerical representation of groups in cooperative settings: Social orientation effects on ingroup bias* 1,* 2,* 3. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(6), 630–659.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York: Free Press.
Bradac, J. J. (1990). Language attitudes and impressions formation. In H. Giles & W. P. Robison (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 387–412). New York: Wiley.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
Brickson, S., & Brewer, M. (2001). Identity orientation and in- tergroup relations in organizations. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39(3), 214.
Burisch, M. (1997). Test length and validity revisited. European Journal of Personality, 11(4), 303–315.
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.
Cesar, H. S. (2012). Control and game models of the greenhouse effect: Economics essays on the comedy and tragedy of the commons (Vol. 416). Berlin: Springer.
Chatman, J. A. (2010). Norms in mixed sex and mixed race work groups. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 447–484.
Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 956–974.
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 749–780.
Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 101–116.
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457.
Cook, R. (1998). Turnaround. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics International.
Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847.
Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263.
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.
Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1107–1123.
das Neves, J. C., & Melé, D. (2013). Managing ethically cultural diversity: Learning from Thomas Aquinas. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 769–780.
Davidson, M. N. (2011). The end of diversity as we know it: Why diversity efforts fail and how leveraging difference can succeed. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2002). Perceived criticality and contributions in public good dilemmas: A matter of feeling responsible to all? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5(4), 319–332.
De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Leeuwen, E. (2008). Cooperating If one’s goals are collective-based: Social Identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1562–1579.
Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 233–242.
Dumas, T. L., Rothbard, N. P., & Phillips, K. W. (2008). Self-disclosure: Beneficial for cohesion in demographically diverse work groups?. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (2002). Multinational work teams: A new perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26–49.
Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(4), 393–412.
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102–111.
Feldman, D. C. (2002). Stability in the midst of change: A developmental perspective on the study of careers (pp. 3–26). Work Careers: A Developmental Perspective.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878.
Flynn, F. J., Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2001). Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 414–442.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451.
Greenspan, S., & Driscoll, J. (1997). The role of intelligence in a broad model of personal competence. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 131–150). New York: Guilford Press.
Griffith, T. L., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Conflict and virtual teams. In Virtual teams that work (pp. 335–352). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE, 32(4), 1199–1228.
Hintz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processers. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43–64.
Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 673–703.
Joardar, A. (2011). Examining changes in group acceptance of a newcomer from a different culture. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(3), 341–362.
Jonsen, K., Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M. F., & Bell, M. P. (2013). The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity. Human Relations, 66(2), 271–294.
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899.
Kim, P. H. (1997). When what you KnowCanHurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 165–177.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human resource management, 42(1), 3–21.
Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 5–30.
Leary, M. R. (2001). Toward a conceptualization of interpersonal rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press.
Leslie, L. M. (2014). A status-based multilevel model of ethnic diversity and work unit performance. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206314535436.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662.
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31–55.
Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5–12.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for” intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535.
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 166, 195.
Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1998). The role of liking in perceptions of the moral responsibility to help: A cultural perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 443–469.
Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2(3), 183–200.
O’Leary, B. J., & Weathington, B. L. (2006). Beyond the business case for diversity in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(4), 283–292.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.
Phillips, K. W., Liljenquist, K. A., & Neale, M. A. (2009a). Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with ethnically distinct newcomers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 336–350.
Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 143–160.
Phillips, K. W., Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 497–510.
Phillips, K. W., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2006). Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 467–482.
Phillips, K. W., Rothbard, N. P., & Dumas, T. L. (2009b). To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. The Academy of Management Review Archive, 34(4), 710–732.
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617.
Randel, A. E., & Jaussi, K. S. (2003). Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 763–774.
Roffey, S. (2017). Positive relationships at work. In L. G. Oades, M. F. Steger, A. Delle Fave, and J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths-based approaches at work (pp. 171–190). Wiley Online Libary.
Ruscher, J. B. (2001). Prejudiced communication: A social psychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Salk, J. E., & Brannen, M. Y. (2000). National culture, networks, and individual influence in a multinational management team. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 191–202.
Sawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. L. (2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 1–15.
Shapiro, D. L., Furst, S. A., Spreitzer, G. M., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2002). Transnational teams in the electronic age: Are team identity and high performance at risk? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 455–467.
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(5), 393–422.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Psychology Press.
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49(4), 464–477.
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Phillips, K. W. (2011). The malleability of race in organizational teams: A theory of racial status activation. In Status in management and organizations (p. 238). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Trittin, H., & Schoeneborn, D. (2017). Diversity as polyphony: Reconceptualizing diversity Management from a communication-centered perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 305–322.
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579.
Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402–423.
Van Dijk, H., van Engen, M., & Paauwe, J. (2012a). Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 73–84.
Van Dijk, H., Van Engen, M. L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2012b). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38–53.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.
Von Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (2004). Can we talk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 578–592.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20(20), 77–140.
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crane, B., Thomas-Hunt, M. & Kesebir, S. To Disclose or Not to Disclose: The Ironic Effects of the Disclosure of Personal Information About Ethnically Distinct Newcomers to a Team. J Bus Ethics 158, 909–921 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3714-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3714-0