This paper advances stakeholder salience theory from the viewpoint of small businesses. It is argued that the stakeholder salience process for small businesses is influenced by their local embeddedness, captured by the idea of social proximity, and characterised by multiple relationships that the owner-manager and stakeholders share beyond the business context. It is further stated that the ethics of care is a valuable ethical lens through which to understand social proximity in small businesses. The contribution of the study conceptualises how the perceived social proximity between local stakeholders and small business owner-managers influences managerial considerations of the legitimacy, power and urgency of stakeholders and their claims. Specifically, the paradoxical nature of close relationships in the salience process is acknowledged and discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
In this study, the concept of locality includes the idea of local community as the embodiment of a certain geographical closeness and social proximity in terms of feelings of belonging and similarity.
Addelson, K. P. (1991). Impure thoughts: Essays on philosophy, feminism, and ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs. An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–527.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.
Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Social Capital: A review from an ethics perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review., 23(1), 108–124.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.
Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L., & Scherer, A. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705.
Baumback, C. M. (1988). How to organize and operate a small business (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Besser, T. L., & Jarnagin, S. K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. Small businesses and small towns. History of corporate social responsibility project. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Ethical Business Cultures located at the Opus College of Business, University of St.Thomas—Minnesota.
Besser, T. L., & Miller, N. (2001). Is the good corporation dead? The community social responsibility of small business operators. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(3), 221–241.
Besser, T. L., & Miller, N. (2013). Social capital, local businesses, and amenities in U.S. rural prairie communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 186–195.
Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators, and coalitions. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Borgerson, J. L. (2007). On the harmony of feminist ethics and business ethics. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 477–509.
Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.
Cameron, J. E. (1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 179–189.
Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173.
Courrent, J.-M., & Gundolf, K. (2009). Proximity and micro-enterprise manager’s ethics: A French empirical study of responsible business attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 749–762.
Cox, K. (1998). Locality and community: Some conceptual issues. European Planning Studies, 6(1), 17–30.
Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. (1994). Small firms and local economic networks. The death of the local economy?. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Deaux, K. (1994). Social identity. In J. Worrell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–1067). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
DeMoss, M., & McCann, G. (1997). Without a care in the world: The business ethics course and its exclusion of a care perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 435–443.
Desiraju, R., & Moorthy, S. (1997). Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirements. Management Sci., 43(12), 1628–1644.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.
Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The Primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73.
Durkin, M., McGowan, P., & McKeown, N. (2013). Exploring social media adoption in small to medium-sized enterprises in Ireland. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 716–734.
Dyer, W. G., & Handler, W. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 71.
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.
Filion, L. J. (1990). Free trade: The need for a definition of small business. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 33–46.
Frederiksen, C. S. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories—An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 357–371.
Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation of SME narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 287–304.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goss, D. (2005). Shumpeter’s legacy? Interaction and emotions in the sociology of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 205–218.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25–56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 121–139.
Haytko, D. L. (2004). Firm-to-firm and interpersonal relationships: Perspectives from advertising agency account managers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 312–328.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.
Huber, F. (2012). On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster. Regional Studies, 46, 1169–1182.
Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 355–377.
Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256.
Johannisson, B., & Mönsted, M. (1997). Contextualising entrepreneurial networking—The case of Scandinavia. International Studies of Management and Organisations, 27(3), 109–136.
Johannisson, B., Ramírez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 297–315.
Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 293–307.
Kitching, J. (1994). Employer’s work-force construction policies in the small service sector enterprise. In D. Storey & J. Atkinson (Eds.), Employment, the small firm, and the labour market (pp. 103–146). London: Routledge.
Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(6), 88–90.
Lähdesmäki, M., & Siltaoja, M. (2010). Towards variety of meanings—Multiple representations of reputation in small business context. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 207–222.
Lähdesmäki, M., & Suutari, T. (2012). Keeping at arm’s length or searching for proximity? Corporate social responsibility as a reciprocal process between small businesses and the local community. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 481–493.
Laplume, A., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. (2008). Stakeholder theory: A longitudinal review of a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 24(6), 1152–1189.
Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273.
Liedtka, J. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethics of care. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.
Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., Petty, J. W., Palich, L. E., & McKinney, J. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183.
Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Christman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235–255.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 796–812.
Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 357–378.
Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83–93.
Oerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do organization and spatial proximity impact firm performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104.
Oinas, P. (1998). The embedded firm? Predule for a revived geography of enterprise. Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, A-143, Helsinki, Finland.
Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.
Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285–300.
Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in contemporary sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
Quayle, M. (2002). E-commerce: The challenge for UK SMEs in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(10), 1148–1161.
Quinn, J. J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 119–127.
Rao, H., Davis, G. F., & Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268–292.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91–115.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties. A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453–473.
Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189–209.
Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.
Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 413–427.
Siltaoja, M., & Lähdesmäki, M. (2015). From rationality to emotionally embedded elations: Envy as a signal of power in stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 837–850.
Simpson, B., & Willer, R. (2008). Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(1), 37–52.
Sorenson, O. (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(5), 513–527.
Spence, L. J. (2004). Forever friends? Friendship, dynamic relationships and small firm social responsibility. London: Brunel University, Brunel Research in Enterprise, Innovation, Sustainability and Ethics.
Spence, L. J. (2014). Business ethics and social responsibility in small firms. In E. Chell & M. Karatas-Özkan (Eds.), Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: Redrawing core CSR theory. Business and Society, 55(1), 23–55.
Spence, L. J., Coles, A.-M., & Harris, L. (2001). The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Business and Society Review, 106(4), 331–352.
Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5.
Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17–29.
Steier, L. P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2015). Governance challenges in family businesses and Business Families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. doi:10.1111/etap.12180.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Taifel (Ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tashman, P., & Raelin, J. (2013). What and what really matters to the firm: Moving stakeholder salience beyond managerial perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 591–616.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
Valcour, P. M. (2002). Managerial behavior in a multiplex role system. Human Relations, 55(10), 1153–1188.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1979). Multiplexity in adult friendships. Social Forces, 57(4), 1286–1309.
von Weltzien, H., & Melé, D. (2009). Can an SME become a global corporate citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551–563.
von Weltzien, H., & Shankar, D. (2011). How can SMEs in a cluster respond to global demands for corporate responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 175–195.
Wilson, J. M., O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002.
Worthington, I., Ram, M., & Jones, T. (2006). Exploring corporate social responsibility in the U.K. Asian small business community. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 201–217.
Zavyalova, A., Pfaffer, M., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. (2016). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders' organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 253–276.
Merja Lähdesmäki and Marjo Siltaoja have received research grants from Academy of Finland (Grant Numbers 259482 and 260138). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Editors at the Journal of Business Ethics are recused from all decisions relating to submissions with which there is any identified potential conflict of interest. Submissions to the Journal of Business Ethics from editors of the journal are handled by a senior independent editor at the journal and subject to full double blind peer review processes.
About this article
Cite this article
Lähdesmäki, M., Siltaoja, M. & Spence, L.J. Stakeholder Salience for Small Businesses: A Social Proximity Perspective. J Bus Ethics 158, 373–385 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3707-z
- Ethics of care
- Local embeddedness
- Small business
- Social proximity
- Stakeholder relations
- Stakeholder salience