Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 146, Issue 2, pp 313–332 | Cite as

Beyond the Opposition Between Altruism and Self-interest: Reciprocal Giving in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

  • Kévin AndréEmail author
  • Sylvain Bureau
  • Arthur Gautier
  • Olivier Rubel
Original Paper

Abstract

Increasingly, frontiers between business and philanthropy seem to be blurred. Reward-Based Crowdfunding platforms contribute to this blurring of lines since they propose funders to support both for-profit and philanthropic projects. Our empirical paper explores the case of Ulule, the leading crowdfunding platform in Europe. Our results, based on a statistical analysis of more than 3000 projects, show that crowdfunding platforms foster specific kinds of relationships relying on reciprocal giving, beyond the usual opposition between altruistic and selfish motivations. We use the work of Marcel Mauss to account for this process of reciprocal giving, and we argue that Maussian theory of gift can be used more generally to describe funding activities in the context of early stage entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Crowdfunding Entrepreneurship Gift Philanthropy Reciprocity Mauss 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Tobias Goessling and the editors of the thematic symposium on "Business Ethics, Peace & Environmentas" as well as two anonymous reviewers for their helpful guidance and feedback. We are also very grateful to Arnaud Burgot, COO of Ulule and his team for allowing us to collect and analyze such interesting data.

References

  1. Abela, A. V., & Shea, R. (2014). Avoiding the separation thesis while maintaining a positive/normative distinction. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(11), 31–41.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 39(4), 955–980.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  5. Alter, N. (2010). Donner et prendre: La coopération en entreprise. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  6. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreoni, J. (2001). Philanthropy, economics of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 11369–11376). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arenas, D., & Rodrigo, P. (2016). On firms and the next generations: Difficulties and possibilities for business ethics inquiry. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Assenova, V., Best, J., Cagney, M., Ellenoff, D., Karas, K., Moon, J., et al. (2016). The present and future of crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Batson, C. D. (2014). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baviera, T., English, W., & Guillén, M. (2016). The “Logic of Gift”: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Boas, F. (1888). The Indians of British Columbia. The Popular Science Monthly, 32, 628–636.Google Scholar
  18. Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boudreau, K., Jeppesen, L. B., Reichstein, T., & Rullani, F. (2015). Crowdfunding as “Donations”: Theory & Evidence (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2669545). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2669545. Accessed October 10, 2016.
  20. Brüderl, J., & Preisendorf, P. (1998) Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions, and actions in organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Bureau, S. (2014). Essai sur le don en gestion. Le LIbellio d’Aegis, 10(3), 5–20.Google Scholar
  23. Bureau, S., & Fendt, J. (2011). Entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Why does it matter? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12(2), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2014). Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 773–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Caillé, A., & Grésy, J.-E. (2014). La Révolution du don: Le management repensé à la lumière de l’anthropologie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  26. Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2009). Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs: new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Caputo, J. D. (1997). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Carrier, J. (1991). Gifts, commodities, and social relations: A Maussian view of exchange. Sociological Forum, 6(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen, S., & Choi, C. J. (2005). A social exchange perspective on business ethics: An application to knowledge exchange. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chetty, S., & Agndal, H. (2007). Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cialdini, R. B. (1991). Altruism or egoism? That is (still) the question. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., et al. (2014). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 39(1), 75–100.Google Scholar
  33. Cordova, A., Dolci, J., & Gianfrate, G. (2015). The determinants of crowdfunding success: Evidence from technology projects. 3rd International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management, 181, 115–124.Google Scholar
  34. Cornell, C. J., & Luzar, C. (2014). Crowdfunding fraud: How big is the threat? Crowdfund insider. http://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2014/03/34255-crowdfunding-fraud-big-threat/. October 14, 2014.
  35. Crosetto, P., & Regnier, T. (2014). Crowdfunding: Determinants of success and funding dynamics. Jena Economics Research Papers, 035.Google Scholar
  36. Dakin, K. J. (2016). You ain’t seen nothing yet: Investment crowdfunding has tremendous growth potential! Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship, 3, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Davidson, R., & Poor, N. (2016). Factors for success in repeat crowdfunding: why sugar daddies are only good for Bar-Mitzvahs. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. de Peyrelongue, B., Masclef, O., & Guillard, V. (2016). The Need to Give Gratuitously: A Relevant Concept Anchored in Catholic Social Teaching to Envision the Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Deckop, R., Caril, C., & Andersson, L. (2003). Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dees, J. G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector-bending: Blurring lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society, 40(4), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Derrida, J. (1992). Given time: Counterfeit money (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Dolfsma, W., van der Eijk, R., & Jolink, A. (2009). On a source of social capital: Gift exchange. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Douglas, M. (1990). No free gifts. In M. Mauss (Ed.), The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (pp. 9–23). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Dushnitsky, G., & Marom, D. (2013). Crowd monogamy. Business Strategy Review, 24(4), 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Elms, H., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(03), 403–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Faldetta, G. (2011). The logic of gift and gratuitousness in business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). Theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fassin, Y. (2012). Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ferrary, M. (2003). The gift exchange in the social networks of silicon valley. California Management Review, 45(4), 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2016). Financing by and for the Masses: An introduction to the special issue on crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  56. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2011). No strings attached: welcoming the existential gift in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gautier, A., & Pache, A.-C. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S. et al. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to participate? In Proceedings of the international workshop on design, influence, and social technologies: Techniques, impacts and ethics, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  61. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Giancarlo, G., Massimiliano, G., & Lamastra, C. R. (2013). Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: The role of proponents individual and territorial social capital. SSRN Electronic Journal, April, 2255944.Google Scholar
  63. Godbout, J. T. (2007). Ce qui circule entre nous: donner, recevoir, rendre. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  64. Godbout, J. T., & Caillé, A. (2007). L’esprit du don. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and take: Why helping others drives our success. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  68. Gray, D., & Clarke, P. (2005). Meeting Goodpaster’s challenge: A Smithian approach to Goodpaster’s paradox. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Harrison, R. T., Mason, C. M., & Girling, P. (2004). Financial bootstrapping and venture development in the software industry. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hildebrand, T., Puri, M., & Rocholl, J. (2016). Adverse incentives in crowdfunding. Management Science, 63(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hühn, M., & Dierksmeier, C. (2016). Will the real A. Smith please stand up! Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Johannisson, B. (1988). Business formation: A network approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3–4), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kaler, J. (2000). Reasons to be ethical: Self-interest and ethical business. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1–2), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kappel, T. (2009). Ex ante crowdfunding and the recording industry: A Model for the US Loyola LA Entertainment Law Review, 29, 375.Google Scholar
  76. Karra, N., Tracey, P., et al. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(6), 861–877.Google Scholar
  77. Kim, P., Aldrich, H., & Keister, L. (2006). Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, 27(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Komter, A. (2007). Gifts and social relations the mechanisms of reciprocity. International Sociology, 22(1), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. La Cour, A., & Kromann, J. (2011). Euphemisms and hypocrisy in corporate philanthropy. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Letts, C. W., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 36–50.Google Scholar
  81. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1983). Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Mair, J., & Hehenberger, L. (2014). Front-stage and backstage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1174–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  84. Mauss, M. (1923). Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L’Année Sociologique, 1, 30–186.Google Scholar
  85. Meyskens, M., & Bird, L. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2),155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mintzberg, H. (2015). Time for the plural sector. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(3), 28–33.Google Scholar
  87. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nagel, T. (1978). The possibility of altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Norcia, V. D., & Larkins, J. T. (2000). Mixed motives and ethical decisions in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Offer, A. (1997). Between the gift and the market: The economy of regard. The Economic History Review, 50(3), 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pallotta, D. (2008). Uncharitable: How restraints on nonprofits undermine their potential. Medford: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H.-W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pitschner, S., & Pitschner-Finn, S. (2014). Non-profit differentials in crowd-based financing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns. Economics Letters, 123(3), 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 2.Google Scholar
  99. Raphael, D. D. (2007). The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rehn, A., & Taalas, S. (2004). ‘Znakomstva I Svyazi’ (Acquaintances and connections)–Blat, the Soviet Union, and Mundane Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rhodes, C., & Westwood, R. (2016). The limits of generosity: Lessons on ethics, economy, and reciprocity in Kafka’s the metamorphosis. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York.Google Scholar
  103. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation. Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  104. Schrift, A. D. (Ed.). (2014). The logic of the gift: Toward an ethic of generosity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Schwartz, B. (1967). The social psychology of the gift. American Journal of Sociology, 73(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shaver, R. (1999). Rational egoism: A selective and critical history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Silber, I. (1998). Modern philanthropy: reassessing the viability of a Maussian perspective. In W. James & N. J. Allen (Eds.), Marcel Mauss: A centenary tribute (pp. 134–150). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  108. Simon, H. (1982). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sørensen, A. (2002). Value, business and globalisation-sketching a critical conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1/2), 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Spiller, C., Erakovic, L., Henare, M., & Pio, E. (2011). Relational well-being and wealth: Māori businesses and an ethic of care. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Stanca, L. (2009). Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Stewart, A. (2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship, 27(4), 383–396.Google Scholar
  113. Steyaert, C., & Hjorth, D. (2007). Entrepreneurship as social change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  114. Szmigin, I., & Rutherford, R. (2013). Shared value and the impartial spectator test. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Thürridl, C., & Kamleitner, B. (2016). What goes around comes around? Rewards as strategic assets in crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  117. Van Wingerden R., & Ryan J. (2011). Fighting for funds: An exploratory study into the field of crowdfunding. Lund University School of Economics and Management, p. 65.Google Scholar
  118. Venkat, K., & Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google Scholar
  119. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz, & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3, 119–138.Google Scholar
  120. Vernale, G., & Packard, S. A. (1990). Organ donation as gift exchange. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22(4), 239–242.Google Scholar
  121. Vesterlund, L. (2006). Why do people give? In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 168–190). New Heaven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Webley, P., Lea, S. E. G., & Portalska, R. (1983). The unacceptability of money as a gift. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4(3), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Westwood, R., Chan, A., & Linstead, S. (2004). Theorizing chinese employment relations comparatively: Exchange, reciprocity and the moral economy. Asian Pacific Jounral of Management, 21, 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Williams, C. C. (2007). The nature of entrepreneurship in the informal sector: Evidence from England. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zhang, J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58(5), 892–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kévin André
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sylvain Bureau
    • 2
  • Arthur Gautier
    • 1
  • Olivier Rubel
    • 3
  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy-PontoiseFrance
  2. 2.ESCP EuropeParisFrance
  3. 3.UC DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations