Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 617–633 | Cite as

Deviant Behavior in a Moderated-Mediation Framework of Incentives, Organizational Justice Perception, and Reward Expectancy

  • Shandana Shoaib
  • Yehuda BaruchEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study introduces the concept of deviant behavior in a moderated-mediation framework of incentives and organizational justice perception. The proposed relationships in the theoretical framework were tested with a sample of 311 academics, using simple random sampling, via causal models and structural equation modeling. The findings suggest that incentives might boost the apparent performance, but not necessarily the intended performance. The results confirm that employees’ affection for incentives has direct, indirect, and conditional indirect effects on their deviant behavior likelihood. The relationship between employee deviant behavior likelihood and affection for incentives was moderated by organizational justice perception and partially mediated by reward expectancy, thus having significant contributions toward the extant literature of deviant behavior and incentives. The findings have important implications for managers, academicians, and policy makers for mitigating adverse behavior in professional employees through proper use of incentives.

Keywords

Performance-related pay Deviant behavior Organizational justice Academe 

References

  1. Abe, M. (2007). Why companies in Japan are introducing performance-based treatment and reward systems-the background. Japan Labor Review, 4(2), 7–36.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.Google Scholar
  4. Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2013). What monetary rewards can and cannot do: How to show employees the money. Business Horizons, 56(2), 241–249.Google Scholar
  5. Aguinis, H., & O’Boyle, E. (2014). Star performers in twenty-first century organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 313–350.Google Scholar
  6. Allcock, D., & Filatotchev, I. (2010). Executive incentive schemes in initial public offerings: The effects of multiple-agency conflicts and corporate governance. Journal of Management, 36(3), 663–686.Google Scholar
  7. Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., Loewenstein, G., & Mazar, N. (2009). Large stakes and big mistakes. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 451–469.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Croxon, B., Gregg, P., Propper, C., Slater, H., et al. (2009). Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics, 16(3), 251–261.Google Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Kimmel, S. K. (1995). A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal directed behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(4), 437–461.Google Scholar
  10. Ballou, D. (2001). Pay for performance in public and private schools. Economics of Education Review, 20(1), 51–61.Google Scholar
  11. Baruch, Y., & Hall, D. T. (2004). The academic career: A model for future careers in other sectors? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2), 241–262.Google Scholar
  12. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.Google Scholar
  13. Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016). A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: Toward a realistic discourse. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 355–372.Google Scholar
  14. Beauregard, T. A. (2014). Fairness perceptions of work—life balance initiatives: Effects on counterproductive work behaviour. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 772–789.Google Scholar
  15. Beer, M., Cannon, M. D., Baron, J. N., Dailey, P. R., Gerhart, B., Heneman, H. G., et al. (2004). Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 3–48.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.Google Scholar
  17. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Blunch, N. J. (2010). Introduction to structural equation modelling using IBM SPSS and AMOS. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Bonner, S. E. (1999). Judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 385–398.Google Scholar
  20. Bonner, S. E., Hastie, R., Sprinkle, G. B., & Young, S. M. (2000). A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: Implications for management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 19–64.Google Scholar
  21. Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4), 303–345.Google Scholar
  22. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189–208.Google Scholar
  23. Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human Resource Management Review, 22(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  24. Burgess, S., Propper, C., Ratto, M. & Tominey, E. (2012). Incentives in the public sector: Evidence from a government agency. Technical Report, Discussion Paper series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.Google Scholar
  25. Case, J. (2001). When salaries aren’t secret. Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 37–49.Google Scholar
  26. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.Google Scholar
  27. Chen, J., Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, N. (2014). Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 197–219.Google Scholar
  28. Cho, Y. J., & Perry, J. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes, role of man aerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 382–406.Google Scholar
  29. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.Google Scholar
  30. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.Google Scholar
  31. Creech, J. D. (2000). Linking higher education performance indicators to goals. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.Google Scholar
  32. Cropanzano, R. (2001). Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 3–26). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Currall, S. C., Towler, A. J., Judge, T. A., & Kohn, L. (2005). Pay satisfaction and organizational outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 613–640.Google Scholar
  34. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.Google Scholar
  35. Deckop, J. R., Mangel, R., & Cirka, C. C. (1999). Research notes. Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behaviour and pay-for-performance plans. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 420–428.Google Scholar
  36. Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(5), 1026–1040.Google Scholar
  37. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  38. Elayan, F. A., Lau, J. S., & Meyer, T. O. (2003). Executive incentive compensation schemes and their impact on corporate performance: Evidence from New Zealand since compensation disclosure requirements became effective. Studies in Economics and Finance, 21(1), 54–92.Google Scholar
  39. Emerson, R. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Fairchild, A. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science, 10(2), 87–99.Google Scholar
  41. Fang, M., & Gerhart, B. S. (2012). Does pay for performance diminish intrinsic interest? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6), 1176–1196.Google Scholar
  42. Figlio, D. N., & Kenny, L. W. (2007). Individual teacher incentives and student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5), 901–914.Google Scholar
  43. Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34(7), 949–972.Google Scholar
  44. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.Google Scholar
  45. Furnham, A., & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.Google Scholar
  47. Gardner, D. G., Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 307–322.Google Scholar
  48. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.Google Scholar
  49. Gneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 191–209.Google Scholar
  50. Gold, J. I. (2003). Linking reward expectancy to behavior in the basal ganglia. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(1), 12–14.Google Scholar
  51. Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1992). Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 381–397.Google Scholar
  52. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921–955.Google Scholar
  53. Grant, A. M. (2013). Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: The role of emotion regulation in employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1703–1723.Google Scholar
  54. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.Google Scholar
  55. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(1), 81–103.Google Scholar
  56. Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). The handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Greene, R. J. (2011). Rewarding performance: Guiding principles, custom strategies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Guzzo, R. A. (1979). Types of rewards, cognitions, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 75–86.Google Scholar
  59. Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2000). Optimal exercise prices for executive stock options. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  60. Hansen, M. (2009). How career concerns influence public workers’ effort: Evidence from the teacher labor market. Working Paper 40. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.Google Scholar
  61. Harder, J. W. (1992). Play for pay: Effects of inequity in a pay-for-performance context. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 321–335.Google Scholar
  62. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Holbeche, L. (2005). The high performance organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Ims, K. J., Pedersen, L. J. T., & Zsolnai, L. (2014). How economic incentives may destroy social, ecological and existential values: The case of executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 353–360.Google Scholar
  65. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.Google Scholar
  66. Kang, S. C., & Yanadori, Y. (2011). Adoption and coverage of performance-related pay during institutional change: An integration of institutional and agency theories. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1837–1865.Google Scholar
  67. Kelley, C., & Odden, A. (1995). Reinventing teacher compensation systems. In: Consortium for policy research in education (Vol. 6). Consortium for policy research in education.Google Scholar
  68. Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (1992). Performance related pay: Objectives and application. Human Resource Management Journal, 2(3), 16–33.Google Scholar
  69. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 54–63.Google Scholar
  71. Kotowitz, Y. (1987). Moral hazard. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave-a dictionary of economics (Vol. 3, pp. 451–549). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Kruglanski, A. W., Chernikova, M., & Schori-Eyal, N. (2014). From readiness to action: How motivation works. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45(3), 259–267.Google Scholar
  73. Kunz, A. H., & Pfaff, D. (2002). Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), 275–295.Google Scholar
  74. Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365–385.Google Scholar
  75. Lai, E. R. (2011). Motivation: A literature review. Person Research’s Report. Available Online: http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.
  76. Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 87–109.Google Scholar
  77. Lavy, V. (2009). Performance pay and teachers’ effort, productivity, and grading ethics. The American Economic Review, 99(5), 1979–2021.Google Scholar
  78. Lawler, E. E. (2000). Rewarding excellence (Vol. 13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  79. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  80. Lawler, E. E., III, & Suttle, J. L. (1973). Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(3), 482–503.Google Scholar
  81. Lazear, E. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361.Google Scholar
  82. Li, N., Barrick, M. R., Zimmerman, R. D., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2014). Retaining the productive employee: The role of personality. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 347–395.Google Scholar
  83. Luna-Arocas, R., & Tang, T. L. P. (2015). Are you satisfied with your pay when you compare? It depends on your love of money, pay comparison standards, and culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 279–289.Google Scholar
  84. Manly, T. S., Leonard, L. N., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2015). Academic integrity in the information age: Virtues of respect and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 579–590.Google Scholar
  85. Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management (Vol. 7). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  86. Milkovich, G. (1996). Does performance-based pay really work: Conclusions based on the scientific research? Revista Sobre Relaciones Industriales Y Laborales (Parte II), 32.Google Scholar
  87. Miller, R. D., & Cohen, N. H. (2005). The impact of productivity-based incentives on faculty salary-based compensation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 101(1), 195–199.Google Scholar
  88. Mills, J. C. H., Bratton, J., & Forshaw, C. (2006). Organizational behaviour in a global context. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  89. Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.Google Scholar
  90. Murphy, T. H., & Margulies, J. (2004). Performance appraisals. In Presentation, ABA Labor and Employment Law Section, Equal Employment Opportunity Committee, Mid-Winter Meeting.Google Scholar
  91. Neubert, M. J., Wu, C., & Roberts, J. A. (2013). The influence of ethical leadership and regulatory focus on employee outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 269–296.Google Scholar
  92. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  93. Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.Google Scholar
  94. Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
  95. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  96. Pinder, W. C. C. (2011). Work motivation in organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  97. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
  98. Pour Ezzat, A. A., & Somee, P. (2009). The study of personnel and customers’ perception of organizational justice. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 2(2), 97–113.Google Scholar
  99. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.Google Scholar
  100. Prendergast, C. (1999). The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 7–63.Google Scholar
  101. Raith, M. (2008). Specific knowledge and performance measurement. The Rand Journal of Economics, 39(4), 1059–1079.Google Scholar
  102. Redmond, E. (2013). Competency models at work: The value of perceived relevance and fair rewards for employee outcomes. Human Resource Management, 52(5), 771–792.Google Scholar
  103. Reid, N. (2008). Quality assurance in higher education in pakistan-focus on the learner. In 2nd International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education ICAQHE (Vol. 8, pp. 296–300).Google Scholar
  104. Reuterberg, S., & Gustafsson, J. (1992). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability: Testing measurement model assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 795–811.Google Scholar
  105. Roberts, J. (2004). The modern firm: Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Rousseau, D. M. (1997). Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 515–546.Google Scholar
  107. Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 5–11.Google Scholar
  108. Sardžoska, E. G., & Tang, T. L. P. (2015). Monetary intelligence: Money attitudes—unethical intentions, intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, and coping strategies across public and private sectors in Macedonia. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 93–115.Google Scholar
  109. Schaubroeck, J., Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Mitra, A. (2008). An under-met and over- met expectancy’s model of employee reactions to merit raises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 424–434.Google Scholar
  110. Schöttner, A. (2008). Relational contracts, multitasking, and job design. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 24(1), 138–162.Google Scholar
  111. Schumacher, E. G., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). Institutionalizing ethical innovation in organizations: An integrated causal model of moral innovation decision processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 15–37.Google Scholar
  112. Schwartz, B. (2009). Incentives, choice, education and well-being. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 391–403.Google Scholar
  113. Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 513–540.Google Scholar
  114. Solmon, L. C., & Podgursky, M. (2000). The pros and cons of performance-based compensation. Wilmington: ERIC.Google Scholar
  115. Springer, M. G., Ballou, D., Hamilton, L., Le, V. N., Lockwood, J., McCaffrey, D. F., et al. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching (point). Nashville, TN: National center on performance incentives at Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  116. Sprinkle, G. B. (2000). The effect of incentive contracts on learning and performance. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 299–326.Google Scholar
  117. Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. L., & Shapiro, L. D. (2004). Introduction to special forum topic: The future work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387.Google Scholar
  118. Stilwell, F. (2003). Higher education, commercial criteria and economic incentives. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 51–61.Google Scholar
  119. Susarla, A., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2003). Understanding the service component of application service provision: Empirical analysis of satisfaction with ASP services. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 91–123.Google Scholar
  120. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 83–98.Google Scholar
  121. Thierry, H. (2002). Enhancing performance through pay and reward systems. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (pp. 325–347). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  122. Thomas, R., Goddard, V., Reid, A., & Nicholson, D. (2013). Voices in practice: Will performance-related pay improve teaching and learning? Learning and Teaching Update, 62, 1–5. ISSN 1759-9474.Google Scholar
  123. Trevino, L. K. (1992). Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5–6), 445–459.Google Scholar
  124. Triandis, G. H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  125. Turk, K. (2008). Performance appraisal and the compensation of academic staff in the University of Tartu. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
  126. Usman, S. (2014). Governance and higher education in Pakistan: What roles do boards of governors play in ensuring the academic quality maintenance in public universities versus private universities in Pakistan? International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 38–51.Google Scholar
  127. Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2016). Misbehavior in organizations: A dynamic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  128. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  129. Walker, R. L., & Florea, L. (2014). Easy-come-easy-go: Moral hazard in the context of return to education. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 201–217.Google Scholar
  130. Werner, S., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Determinants of perceived pay inequities: The effects of comparison other characteristics and pay-system communication1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(6), 1281–1309.Google Scholar
  131. Wieth, M. B., & Burns, B. D. (2014). Rewarding multitasking: Negative effects of an incentive on problem solving under divided attention. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 61–67.Google Scholar
  132. Wildman, J. L., Bedwell, W. L., Salas, E., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2011). Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 303–341)., Building and developing the organization. APA handbooks in psychology Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  133. Wright, P., Mukherji, A., & Kroll, M. J. (2001). A reexamination of agency theory assumptions: Extensions and extrapolations. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(5), 413–429.Google Scholar
  134. Wyatt, M. (2013). Motivating teachers in the developing world: Insights from research with English language teachers in Oman. International Review of Education, 59(2), 217–242.Google Scholar
  135. Young, G. J., Beckman, H., & Baker, E. (2012). Financial incentives, professional values and performance: A study of pay-for-performance in a professional organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 964–983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Management SciencesPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.Southampton Business SchoolUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations