Libertarianism and Basic-Income Guarantee: Friends or Foes?

Original Paper

Abstract

The Basic-Income Guarantee is a governmental programme of income redistribution that enjoys an increasing predicament among academic and political circles. Traditionally, the philosophical defence for this programme has been articulated from the standpoint of social liberalism, republicanism, or communism. Recently, however, libertarian philosopher Matt Zwolinski also tried to reconcile the Basic-Income Guarantee scheme with libertarian ethics. To do so, he resorted to the Lockean proviso: to the extent that the institutionalization of private property impoverishes certain people by depriving their access to natural resources, these people deserve compensation and the most pragmatic way of providing this is through a Basic-Income Guarantee. This paper examines Zwolinski’s arguments and responds by demonstrating that the Basic-Income Guarantee is incompatible with libertarian ethics: the current levels of poverty are not caused by the institutionalization of private property and the Basic-Income Guarantee does not constitute a pragmatic approach to eradicate poverty.

Keywords

Basic-Income Guarantee Libertarianism Redistribution 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Juan Ramón Rallo declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No humans were involved, and therefore, informed consent was not needed.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Beito, D. T. (2000). From mutual aid to the welfare state: Fraternal societies and social services, 18901967. University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Boettke, P., & Martin, A. (2013). Taking the “G” out of basic-income guarantee: A comparative political economy perspective on basic income. In G. L. Nell (Ed.), Basic income and the free market. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bradford, S. (2016). The global welfare and poverty effects of rich nation immigration barriers. Working Paper Department of Economics Brigham Young UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Burtless, G. (1986). The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. Federal Res Bank Boston, 30, 22–59.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, B. (2012). Why should we restrict immigration? Cato J, 32(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  7. Clemens, M. A. (2011). Economics and emigration: Trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk? J Econ Perspect, 25(3), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth, 7(3), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gaus, G. F. (1999). Social philosophy. New York: M. E Sharpe.Google Scholar
  12. Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  14. Gochenou, Z., & Caplan, B. (2013). An entrepreneurial critique of Georgism. The Rev Austrian Econ, 26(4), 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Locke, J. (1689). The Second Treatise of Civil Government. England: Awnsham Churchill.Google Scholar
  16. Mack, E. (2006). Non-absolute rights and libertarian taxation. Soc Philos Policy, 23(2), 109–141.Google Scholar
  17. Menger, C. (1871 [2007]). Principles of economics. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Murray, C. (2006). In our hands: A plan to replace the welfare state. Aei Press.Google Scholar
  19. Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2004). Multitude. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (2017). Taxing wages 2017.Google Scholar
  22. Rallo, J. R. (2015). Contra la renta básica. Barcelona: Deusto.Google Scholar
  23. Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Romer, P. (2010). Technologies, rules, and progress: The case for charter cities. Washington: Center for global development.Google Scholar
  25. Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. Am Econ Rev, 100(3), 763–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sala-i-Martín, X. (2006). The world distribution of income: falling poverty and convergence period. The Q J Econ, 121(2), 351–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmidtz, D. (2005). The elements of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Simmons, A. J. (1992). The Lockean theory of rights. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Standing, G. (2004). Promoting income security as a right. Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tomasi, J. (1998). The key to Locke’s Proviso. British J Hist Philos, 6(3), 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Parijs, P. (1997). Real freedom for all: What (if Anything) can justify capitalism?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Parijs, P. and Vanderborght, Y. (2010). Basic Income, Globalization and Migration. Proceedings of the Basic Income International Conference in Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  33. Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. World Bank (2011). The changing wealth of nations.Google Scholar
  35. World Bank (2016). Poverty and shared prosperity 2016: Taking on inequality.Google Scholar
  36. Zwolinski, M. (2008). libertarianism. the internet encyclopedia of philosophy.Google Scholar
  37. Zwolinski, M. (2014) Externalities all the way down: A response to huemer on land rent. Cato Unbound: The Basic Income and the Welfare State. Cato InstituteGoogle Scholar
  38. Zwolinski, M. (2015). Property Rights, Coercion, and the Welfare State The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income for All. Indepen Rev, 19(4), 515–529.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIE UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations