Advertisement

Uncivil Supervisors and Perceived Work Ability: The Joint Moderating Roles of Job Involvement and Grit

  • Dana Kabat-Farr
  • Benjamin M. Walsh
  • Alyssa K. McGonagle
Original Paper

Abstract

Uncivil behavior by leaders may be viewed as an effective way to motivate employees. However, supervisor incivility, as a form of unethical supervision, may be undercutting employees’ ability to do their jobs. We investigate linkages between workplace incivility and perceived work ability (PWA), a variable that captures employees’ appraisals of their ability to continue working in their jobs. We draw upon the appraisal theory of stress and social identity theory to examine incivility from supervisors as an antecedent to PWA, and to investigate job involvement and grit as joint moderators of this association. Results from data collected in two samples of working adults provided evidence for three-way interactions in relation to PWA. Among employees with high levels of grit, there was no significant relation between supervisor incivility and PWA, regardless of employee job involvement. However, we found some evidence that for those low in grit, having high job involvement was associated with a stronger relationship between supervisor incivility and PWA. Findings attest to the importance of unethical supervisor behavior, showing the potential for supervisor incivility to erode PWA, as well as the importance of grit as a potential buffer.

Keywords

Workplace incivility Perceived work ability Grit Job involvement Unethical supervision 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Cedric Dawkins for his feedback on an earlier draft.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, L., Grimby-Ekman, A., Hagberg, M., & Dellve, L. (2010). The Work Ability Index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 36, 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airila, A., Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., Luukkonen, R., Punakallio, A., & Lusa, S. (2014). Are job and personal resources associated with work ability 10 years later? The mediating role of work engagement. Work and Stress, 28, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alavania, S. M., de Boer, A. G. E. M., van Duivenbooden, J. C., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Burdorf, A. (2009). Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occupational Medicine, 59, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrose, M. L., Schminke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2013). Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beattie, L., & Griffin, B. (2014). Day-level fluctuations in stress and engagement in response to workplace incivility: A diary study. Work and Stress, 28, 124–142.Google Scholar
  10. Blalock, D. V., Young, K. C., & Kleiman, E. M. (2015). Stability amidst turmoil: Grit buffers the effects of negative life events on suicidal ideation. Psychiatry Research, 228, 781–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boddy, C. (2011). Corporate psychopaths, bullying and unfair supervision in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camerino, D., Conway, P. M., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Estryn-Behar, M., Consonni, D., Gould, D., et al. (2006). Low perceived work ability, ageing and intention to leave nursing: a comparison among 10 European countries. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56, 542–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations: Evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39, 1579–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J., & Langhout, R. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263–278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S. A., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer, F. M., Borges, F. N. S., Rotenberg, L., Latorre, M. R. D. O., Soares, N. S., Rosa, P. L. F. S., et al. (2006). Work ability of health care shift workers: What matters? Chronobiology Journal, 23, 1165–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, F. M., & Martinez, M. C. (2013). Individual features, working conditions and work injuries are associated with work ability among nursing professionals. Work: Journal Of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation, 45, 509–517.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeney, Y., & Fellenz, M. R. (2013). Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: Exploring antecedents from a relational perspective. Human Relations, 66, 1427–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  32. Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review, 87, 746–755.Google Scholar
  33. Frone, M. R. (2000). Interpersonal conflict at work and psychological outcomes: Testing a model among young workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1995). Job stressors, job involvement and employee health: A test of identity theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. George, J. M. (2014). Compassion and capitalism: Implications for organizational studies. Journal of Management, 40, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five Factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grant, A. M. (2014). Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach-coachee relationship: Which best predicts coaching success? Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7, 18–38.Google Scholar
  38. Grant, A. M., Curtayne, L., & Burton, G. (2009). Executive coaching enhances goal attainment, resilience and workplace well-being: A randomized controlled study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harold, C. M., & Holtz, B. C. (2015). The effects of passive leadership on workplace incivility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang, J. L., Bowling, N. A., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2015). Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ilmarinen, J., Gould, R., Järvikoski, A., & Järvisalo, J. (2008). Diversity of work ability. In R. Gould, J. Ilmarinen, J. Järvisalo, & S. Koskinen (Eds.), Dimensions of work ability. Results of the health 2000 survey (pp. 13–24). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.Google Scholar
  43. Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  44. Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2017). Receipt of interpersonal citizenship: Fostering agentic emotion, cognition, and action in organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kantor, J., & Streitfeld, D. (2015, August). Inside Amazon: Wrestling big ideas in a bruising workplace. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.
  46. Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Leiter, M. P., Day, A., Gilin Oore, D., & Spence Laschinger, H. K. (2012). Getting better and staying better: Assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lucas, K. (2015). Workplace dignity: Communicating inherent, earned, and remediated dignity. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maddi, S. R., Matthews, M. D., Kelly, D. R., Villarreal, B., & White, M. (2012). The role of hardiness and grit in predicting performance and retention of USMA cadets. Military Psychology, 24, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martus, P., Jakob, O., Rose, U., Seibt, R., & Freude, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of the Work Ability Index. Occupational Medicine, 60, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGonagle, A. K., Beatty, J. E., & Joffe, R. (2014). Coaching for workers with chronic illness: Evaluating an intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McGonagle, A. K., Fisher, G. G., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Grosch, J. W. (2015). Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McGonagle, A. K., Huang, J. L., & Walsh, B. M. (2016). Insufficient effort survey responding: An under-appreciated problem in work and organizational health psychology research. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65, 287–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meier, L. L., & Gross, S. (2015). Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self-control and time with an interaction-record diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 1096–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meriac, J. P., Slifka, J. S., & LaBat, L. R. (2015). Work ethic and grit: An examination of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 451–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Notenbomer, A., Groothoff, J. W., van Rhenen, W., & Roelen, C. A. M. (2015). Associations of work ability with frequent and long-term sickness absence. Occupational Medicine, 65, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Passas, N. (2000). Global anomie, dysnomie, and economic crime: Hidden consequences of neoliberalism and globalization in Russia and around the world. Social Justice, 27, 16–44.Google Scholar
  65. Perrewé, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review, 36, 641–662.Google Scholar
  67. Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pfeffer, J. (2016). Why the assholes are winning: Money trumps all. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 663–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1181–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Radkiewicz, P., & Widerszal-Bazyl, M. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Work Ability Index in light of a comparative survey study. International Congress Series, 1280, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rongen, A., Robroek, S. J., Heijden, B. I., Schouteten, R., Hasselhorn, H. M., & Burdorf, A. (2014). Influence of work-related characteristics and work ability on changing employer or leaving the profession among nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 22, 1065–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rousseau, V., & Aubé, C. (2016). When leaders stifle innovation in work teams: The role of abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8.Google Scholar
  75. Rowan, J. R. (2000). The moral foundation of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Salles, A., Cohen, G. L., & Mueller, C. M. (2014). The relationship between grit and resident well-being. The American Journal of Surgery, 207, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schaubroeck, J., & Jones, J. R. (2000). Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schilpzand, P., de Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S57–S88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Cultural and individual value correlates of capitalism: A comparative analysis. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schwartz, T. (2015). The bad behavior of visionary leaders. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.
  82. Sell, L., Bultmann, U., Rugulies, R., Villadsen, E., Faber, A., & Sogaard, K. (2009). Predicting long-term sickness absence and early retirement pension from self-reported work ability. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82, 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609–637). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  85. Tajfel, H. C., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (Vol. 2, pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  86. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Toth, M. A. (2008). The right to dignity at work: Reflections on article 26 of the revised European social charter. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 29, 275–316.Google Scholar
  90. Tuomi, K., Huuhtanen, P., Nykyri, E., & Ilmarinen, J. (2001). Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement. Occupational Medicine, 51, 318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tuomi, K., Ilmarinen, J., Eskelinen, L., Jarvinen, E., Toikkanen, J., & Klockars, M. (1991). Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 17, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tuomi, K., Ilmarinen, J. A., Jahkola, A., Katajarinne, L., & Tulkki, A. (1998). Work Ability Index (2nd ed.). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.Google Scholar
  93. Ünal, A., Warren, D., & Chen, C. (2012). The normative foundations of unethical supervision in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. von Bonsdorff, M. B., Seitsamo, J., Ilmarinen, J., Nygård, C., von Bonsdorff, M. E., & Rantanen, T. (2011). Work ability in midlife as a predictor of mortality and disability in later life: A 28-year prospective follow-up study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183, E235–E242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhang, S. (2014). Impact of job involvement on organizational citizenship behaviors in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., & Guerra-Báez, R. M. (2016). A study of why anomic employees harm co-workers: Do uncompassionate feelings matter? Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3313-5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana Kabat-Farr
    • 1
  • Benjamin M. Walsh
    • 2
  • Alyssa K. McGonagle
    • 3
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.College of Business and ManagementUniversity of Illinois at SpringfieldSpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations