Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tightrope Walking: Navigating Competition in Multi-Company Cross-Sector Social Partnerships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many challenges to economic and social well-being require close collaboration between business, government, and civil-society actors. In this context, the involvement of multiple companies (i.e., business partners) rather than a single company may enhance such cross-sector social partnerships’ (CSSPs) outcomes. However, extant literature cautions about the tensions arising from companies’ competitive interests and the detrimental effects on the CSSP’s social outcome. Similarly, studies analyzing simultaneous collaboration and competition (i.e., coopetition) suggest shielding off competitive elements from the collaboration. Based on insights into two multi-company CSSPs, we conversely find that government and NGO partnership managers deliberately leveraged competition through the CSSP design. They used similar segmentation mechanisms to enhance CSSP contributions, but differed in the way they integrated collaborative and competitive elements, leading to sustained corporate commitment in one CSSP and unmet promises in the other. These insights expose the paradoxical nature of coopetition at the interface of social and economic goals, and advance current research by indicating competition’s positive effects and the respective partnership design implications. On this basis, our study helps reveal and better understand sustainability-related tensions and opportunities at the inter-organizational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this study, we focus on the social and economic dimensions of corporate CSSP engagement and leave the inclusion of environmental dimensions to future research.

  2. These specifically include World Economic Forum program coordinators.

References

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14(5), 510–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Coopetition” in business networks–to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 58–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-Opetition. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, B., & McNeill, D. (2007). Development issues in global governance: Public–private partnerships and market multilateralism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, S., Möllering, G., Grosso, M., & Zerbini, F. (2010). Exploring how third-party organisations facilitate coopetition management in buyer-seller relationships. In S. Yami, S. Castaldo, B. Dagnino, & F. Le Roy (Eds.), Coopetition: Winning strategies for the 21st century (pp. 141–165). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N., & Wahlqvist, E. (2007). Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A.-S., & Le Roy, F. (2015).The controversy roles of the third-party in coopetition: Stimulating collaboration or competition? In Paper presented at the XXIVème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, AIMS 2015, Paris.

  • Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40, 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B., & Rochlin, S. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., & Stites, J. (2013). Sustainability through partnerships: Capitalizing on collaboration. Network for business sustainability. http://nbs.net/wp-content/uploads/NBS-Systematic-Review-Partnerships.pdf.

  • Grayson, D., & Nelson, J. (2013). Corporate responsibility coalitions. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., & Pinkse, J. (2014). Private environmental governance through cross-sector partnerships tensions between competition and effectiveness. Organization and Environment, 27(2), 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37(2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. (1993). Pursuing collaborative advantage. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(6), 599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Parkhe, A. (2009). Competing and cooperating similarity in global strategic alliances: An exploratory examination. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R., & Kostwinder, E. (2008). Business and partnerships for development. European Management Journal, 26(4), 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, J., & Lehmann, M. (2005). Corporate awakening–Why (some) corporations embrace public–private partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(4), 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roy, F., & Fernandez, A. S. (2015). Managing coopetitive tensions at the working-group level: The rise of the coopetitive project team. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. (2007). Multistakeholder partnerships—future models of multilateralism? Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Dialogue on Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.fes-globalization.org/publications/FESOCP29_Martens_Multistakeholder_Partnerships_ONLINEversion.pdf.

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E., & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 723–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A., & Doh, J. P. (2005). The high impact of collaborative social initiatives. Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., & Falkenberg, L. (2009). The role of collaboration in achieving corporate social responsibility objectives. California Management Review, 51(3), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tensions in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy—when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P., & Tidström, A. (2014). Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(4), 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., & Khattri, N. (2012). Designing a results framework for achieving results: A how-to guide. Washington: Independent Evaluation Group/World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTEVACAPDEV/Resources/designing_results_framework.pdf.

  • Rothaermel, F., & Boeker, W. (2008). Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, L., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2016). Coopetition as a paradox: Integrative approaches in a multi-company, cross-sector partnership. Organization Studies, 37(5), 655–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research; techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A., & Fritz, L. (2006). Disaster relief, Inc. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., Meszoely, G. M., Waddell, S., & Dentoni, D. (2015). The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 993–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, K. (2007). Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2005). Building on the monterrey consensus: The Growing role of public-private partnerships in mobilizing resources for development. http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Initiatives/monterrey2006_summary.pdf.

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grenoble Ecole de Management, 12 Rue Pierre Sémard, 38000, Grenoble, France

    Lea Stadtler

Authors
  1. Lea Stadtler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea Stadtler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stadtler, L. Tightrope Walking: Navigating Competition in Multi-Company Cross-Sector Social Partnerships. J Bus Ethics 148, 329–345 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3579-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3579-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation