Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Relationship Between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This conceptual paper explores the relationship between an organization’s exclusive talent management (TM) practices, employees’ perceptions of the fairness of exclusive TM practices, and the corresponding impact on employee engagement. We propose that in organizations pursuing exclusive TM programs, employee perceptions of organizational justice of the exclusive TM practices may affect their employee engagement, which may influence both organizational and employee outcomes. Building on extant research, we present a conceptual framework depicting the relationship between exclusive TM practices, organizational justice and employee engagement, with social exchange theory and equity theory as the framework’s foundation. The propositions in the framework are each supported by the respective literature. The perceived organizational justice and potential ramifications of exclusive TM practices for employees who are not included in corporate talent pools is an under-researched topic. The paper considers the perspectives of employees not included in corporate talent pools and explores how exclusive TM practices, as inputs, could lead to negative employee engagement outputs. In unpacking how exclusive TM practices could impact on employee engagement, the implications for organizations are underlined. The ethics and perceived fairness of exclusive TM practices, which have the potential to marginalize employees and lead to their disengagement, are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Developed from Wright and Snell (1998), Wright and Nishii (2006)

Fig. 2

Developed from the extant literature, such as Haynie et al. (2016), He et al. (2014), Gelens et al. (2014), Masterson et al. (2000), Saks (2006) and Wright and Nishii (2006)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, R. (2004). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva: International labour office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace. Human Relations, 48(2), 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29(6), 640–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 289–319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, S., Varma, A., & Ramaswami, A. (2013). Linking distributive and procedural justice to employee engagement through social exchange: A field study in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1570–1587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management, 52(8), 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M., Beu, D., Frink, D., Howard, J., Berkson, H., Mobbs, T., et al. (2001). Ethical issues in human resource systems. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic Talent Management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Vaiman, V. (2015). Talent management: Progress and prospects. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Yee Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1983). Equity theory and time: A reformulation. Academy of Management Review, 8, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed., pp. 131–143). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Y., & Swailes, S. (2013). A capability approach to organizational talent management. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 555–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., Schäfer, L., & Scullion, H. (2013). Talent management in medium-sized German companies: An explorative study and agenda for future research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1872–1893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & Gonzalez-Cruz, T. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, T. N., Carbery, R., & Rock, A. (2012). Mapping talent development: definition, scope and architecture. European Journal of Training & Development, 36(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Talent management and organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification. Human Resource Management Journal, 4(2), 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, P., Rai, A., & Sinha, A. (2014). Organizational justice and employee engagement: Exploring the linkage in public sector banks in India. Personnel Review, 43(4), 628–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R. S., & Wood, W. A. (1996). Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1189–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkin, L. (2014). Mid-management, employee engagement, and the generation of reliable sustainable corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayibor, S. (2017). Is fair treatment enough? Augmenting the fairness-based perspective on stakeholder behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, J. J., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (2016). Justice and job engagement: The role of senior management trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 889–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H., Zhu, W., & Zheng, X. (2014). Procedural justice and employee engagement: Roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 681–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmans, J. (2012). Individual differences in equity models. Psycologica, 33, 473–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, S. A. (2016). Rethinking the soft skills deficit blame game: Employers, skills withdrawal and the reporting of soft skills gaps. Human Relations, 69(3), 605–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (2011). Bridging micro & macro domains: Workforce differentiation and strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 37, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P., Preece, D., & Chuai, X. (2010). Talent management as a management fashion in HRD: Towards a research agenda. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, D. M., & Rodwell, J. (2012). Female perceptions of organizational justice. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(6), 723–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katou, A. A. (2013). Justice, trust and employee reactions: An empirical examination of the HRM system. Management Research Review, 36(7), 674–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoreva, V., Vaiman, V., & Van Zalk, M. (2017). Talent management practice effectiveness: investigating employee perspective. Employee Relations, 39, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005). Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organization: why one size does not fit all. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, M. Y., & Groves, K. (2014). Talent management collides with corporate social responsibility: Creation of inadvertent hypocrisy. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in Social Relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. (2012) A study on the relationships among organizational justice, organizational identification, and work engagement: The evidence from the hi-tech service industries. In 2012 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences, Service Innovation in Emerging Economy: Cross-Disciplinary and Cross-Cultural Perspective, IJCSS 2012, 2012. 72–77.

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A., & Benson, P. (2013). Organisational justice climate, social capital and firm performance. Journal of Management Development, 32(7), 721–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. R., & Singh, P. (2014). ‘High potential’ programs: Let’s hear it for ‘B’ players. Human Resource Management Review, 24(4), 330–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2013). HR practices and affective organisational commitment: (When) does HR differentiation pay off? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. C., Collings, D. G. & Paauwe, J. (2015). Talent Management: Towards Balance in Theory and Research. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–1.

  • Meyers, M. C., Van Woerkom, M., & Dries, N. (2013). Talent—Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D., & Collings, D. G. (2013). Seven myths of global talent management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1762–1776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in Strategy Formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. & Crowley-Henry, M. (2015). Exclusive talent management, perceived organizational justice & employee engagement: Bridging the literature. In University Forum for Human Resource Development Conference University College Cork, Ireland.

  • Pfeffer, J. (2001). Fighting the war for talent is hazardous to your organization’s health. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. D. (1968). Equity theory. A review and critique. Organizationial Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 176–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purang, P. (2011). Organisational justice and affective commitment: The mediating role of perceived organisational justice. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roof, R. A. (2015). The association of individual spirituality on employee engagement: The spirit at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Arnaud, A., & Taylor, R. (2014). Ethics, values, and organizational justice: Individuals, organizations, and beyond. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 727–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M., & Anderson, V. (2015). Talent management and organizational diversity: A call for research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(4), 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuck, B. (2011). Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10, 304–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuck, B., & Reio, T. G., Jr. (2014). Employee engagement and well-being: A moderation model and implications for practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, A. (2009). Tackling the challenges of employee engagement. Strategic HR Review, 8(2), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, H. (2014). Ethical talent management: The hall mark of contemporary HRM. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology, 4(2), 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swailes, S. (2013a). The ethics of talent management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(1), 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swailes, S. (2013b). Troubling some assumptions: A response to “The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda”. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 354–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swailes, S., & Blackburn, M. (2016). Employee reactions to talent pool membership. Employee Relations, 38(1), 112–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swailes, S., Downs, Y., & Orr, K. (2014). Conceptualising inclusive talent management: Potential, possibilities and practicalities. Human Resource Development International, 17(5), 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, C., Kirk, S., & Tietze, S. (2013). The currency of talent management—A reply to “talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach”. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., & Ozbilgin, M. F. (2013). An unrequited affinity between talent shortages and untapped female potential: The relevance of gender quotas for talent management in high growth potential economies of the Asia Pacific region. International Business Review, 22(3), 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., & Rowland, C. (2014). Leadership, Pragmatism and Grace: A Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). The joint effects of justice climate, group moral identity, and corporate social responsibility on the prosocial and deviant behaviors of groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 677–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). A review of talent management: ‘infancy or adolescence?’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1744–1761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, H. J., III. (2008). Fairness and the main management theories of the Twentieth Century: A historical review, 1900–1965. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosloban, R. I. (2013). Employee engagement concept—A theoretical and practical approach. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(2), 759–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, H. L., Sulaiman, M., & Omarb, A. (2012). Procedural justice in promotional decisions. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, K. C., & Cobb, A. T. (1999). Career development and organizational justice: Practice and research implications. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M. & Nishii, L. H. (2006). Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis. In CAHRS Working Paper (#07-03). Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies Working Papers Series. Ithica: NY.

  • Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

    Edward P. O’Connor & Marian Crowley-Henry

Authors
  1. Edward P. O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marian Crowley-Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward P. O’Connor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connor, E.P., Crowley-Henry, M. Exploring the Relationship Between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature. J Bus Ethics 156, 903–917 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3543-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3543-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation