Exploring the Relationship Between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature

  • Edward P. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Marian Crowley-Henry
Original Paper


This conceptual paper explores the relationship between an organization’s exclusive talent management (TM) practices, employees’ perceptions of the fairness of exclusive TM practices, and the corresponding impact on employee engagement. We propose that in organizations pursuing exclusive TM programs, employee perceptions of organizational justice of the exclusive TM practices may affect their employee engagement, which may influence both organizational and employee outcomes. Building on extant research, we present a conceptual framework depicting the relationship between exclusive TM practices, organizational justice and employee engagement, with social exchange theory and equity theory as the framework’s foundation. The propositions in the framework are each supported by the respective literature. The perceived organizational justice and potential ramifications of exclusive TM practices for employees who are not included in corporate talent pools is an under-researched topic. The paper considers the perspectives of employees not included in corporate talent pools and explores how exclusive TM practices, as inputs, could lead to negative employee engagement outputs. In unpacking how exclusive TM practices could impact on employee engagement, the implications for organizations are underlined. The ethics and perceived fairness of exclusive TM practices, which have the potential to marginalize employees and lead to their disengagement, are considered.


Talent management Employee engagement Organizational justice Distributive justice Procedural justice Interactional justice Social exchange theory Equity theory Human resource management Ethics 


  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anker, R. (2004). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva: International labour office.Google Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace. Human Relations, 48(2), 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29(6), 640–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 289–319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Biswas, S., Varma, A., & Ramaswami, A. (2013). Linking distributive and procedural justice to employee engagement through social exchange: A field study in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1570–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management, 52(8), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Buckley, M., Beu, D., Frink, D., Howard, J., Berkson, H., Mobbs, T., et al. (2001). Ethical issues in human resource systems. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 74–81.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic Talent Management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Vaiman, V. (2015). Talent management: Progress and prospects. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Yee Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1983). Equity theory and time: A reformulation. Academy of Management Review, 8, 311–319.Google Scholar
  21. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed., pp. 131–143). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Downs, Y., & Swailes, S. (2013). A capability approach to organizational talent management. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Festing, M., Schäfer, L., & Scullion, H. (2013). Talent management in medium-sized German companies: An explorative study and agenda for future research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1872–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  31. Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12–25.Google Scholar
  32. Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & Gonzalez-Cruz, T. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garavan, T. N., Carbery, R., & Rock, A. (2012). Mapping talent development: definition, scope and architecture. European Journal of Training & Development, 36(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Talent management and organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification. Human Resource Management Journal, 4(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ghosh, P., Rai, A., & Sinha, A. (2014). Organizational justice and employee engagement: Exploring the linkage in public sector banks in India. Personnel Review, 43(4), 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Glass, R. S., & Wood, W. A. (1996). Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Godkin, L. (2014). Mid-management, employee engagement, and the generation of reliable sustainable corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayibor, S. (2017). Is fair treatment enough? Augmenting the fairness-based perspective on stakeholder behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haynie, J. J., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (2016). Justice and job engagement: The role of senior management trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 889–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. He, H., Zhu, W., & Zheng, X. (2014). Procedural justice and employee engagement: Roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hofmans, J. (2012). Individual differences in equity models. Psycologica, 33, 473–482.Google Scholar
  48. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
  50. Hurrell, S. A. (2016). Rethinking the soft skills deficit blame game: Employers, skills withdrawal and the reporting of soft skills gaps. Human Relations, 69(3), 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (2011). Bridging micro & macro domains: Workforce differentiation and strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 37, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iles, P., Preece, D., & Chuai, X. (2010). Talent management as a management fashion in HRD: Towards a research agenda. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jepsen, D. M., & Rodwell, J. (2012). Female perceptions of organizational justice. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(6), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Katou, A. A. (2013). Justice, trust and employee reactions: An empirical examination of the HRM system. Management Research Review, 36(7), 674–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Khoreva, V., Vaiman, V., & Van Zalk, M. (2017). Talent management practice effectiveness: investigating employee perspective. Employee Relations, 39, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005). Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organization: why one size does not fit all. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lacey, M. Y., & Groves, K. (2014). Talent management collides with corporate social responsibility: Creation of inadvertent hypocrisy. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.Google Scholar
  60. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in Social Relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  61. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  62. Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Li, H. (2012) A study on the relationships among organizational justice, organizational identification, and work engagement: The evidence from the hi-tech service industries. In 2012 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences, Service Innovation in Emerging Economy: Cross-Disciplinary and Cross-Cultural Perspective, IJCSS 2012, 2012. 72–77.Google Scholar
  64. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mahajan, A., & Benson, P. (2013). Organisational justice climate, social capital and firm performance. Journal of Management Development, 32(7), 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Malik, A. R., & Singh, P. (2014). ‘High potential’ programs: Let’s hear it for ‘B’ players. Human Resource Management Review, 24(4), 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2013). HR practices and affective organisational commitment: (When) does HR differentiation pay off? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meyers, M. C., Collings, D. G. & Paauwe, J. (2015). Talent Management: Towards Balance in Theory and Research. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–1.Google Scholar
  73. Meyers, M. C., Van Woerkom, M., & Dries, N. (2013). Talent—Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Minbaeva, D., & Collings, D. G. (2013). Seven myths of global talent management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 1762–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in Strategy Formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. O’Connor, E. & Crowley-Henry, M. (2015). Exclusive talent management, perceived organizational justice & employee engagement: Bridging the literature. In University Forum for Human Resource Development Conference University College Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
  77. Pfeffer, J. (2001). Fighting the war for talent is hazardous to your organization’s health. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pritchard, R. D. (1968). Equity theory. A review and critique. Organizationial Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 176–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Purang, P. (2011). Organisational justice and affective commitment: The mediating role of perceived organisational justice. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 141–156.Google Scholar
  80. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Roof, R. A. (2015). The association of individual spirituality on employee engagement: The spirit at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schminke, M., Arnaud, A., & Taylor, R. (2014). Ethics, values, and organizational justice: Individuals, organizations, and beyond. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sheehan, M., & Anderson, V. (2015). Talent management and organizational diversity: A call for research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(4), 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shuck, B. (2011). Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10, 304–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shuck, B., & Reio, T. G., Jr. (2014). Employee engagement and well-being: A moderation model and implications for practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Snell, A. (2009). Tackling the challenges of employee engagement. Strategic HR Review, 8(2), 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Soni, H. (2014). Ethical talent management: The hall mark of contemporary HRM. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology, 4(2), 122–130.Google Scholar
  93. Swailes, S. (2013a). The ethics of talent management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(1), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Swailes, S. (2013b). Troubling some assumptions: A response to “The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda”. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Swailes, S., & Blackburn, M. (2016). Employee reactions to talent pool membership. Employee Relations, 38(1), 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Swailes, S., Downs, Y., & Orr, K. (2014). Conceptualising inclusive talent management: Potential, possibilities and practicalities. Human Resource Development International, 17(5), 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tansley, C., Kirk, S., & Tietze, S. (2013). The currency of talent management—A reply to “talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach”. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., & Ozbilgin, M. F. (2013). An unrequited affinity between talent shortages and untapped female potential: The relevance of gender quotas for talent management in high growth potential economies of the Asia Pacific region. International Business Review, 22(3), 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thomas, M., & Rowland, C. (2014). Leadership, Pragmatism and Grace: A Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Thornton, M. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). The joint effects of justice climate, group moral identity, and corporate social responsibility on the prosocial and deviant behaviors of groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). A review of talent management: ‘infancy or adolescence?’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1744–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van Buren, H. J., III. (2008). Fairness and the main management theories of the Twentieth Century: A historical review, 1900–1965. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vosloban, R. I. (2013). Employee engagement concept—A theoretical and practical approach. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(2), 759–765.Google Scholar
  104. Wan, H. L., Sulaiman, M., & Omarb, A. (2012). Procedural justice in promotional decisions. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wooten, K. C., & Cobb, A. T. (1999). Career development and organizational justice: Practice and research implications. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wright, P. M. & Nishii, L. H. (2006). Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis. In CAHRS Working Paper (#07-03). Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies Working Papers Series. Ithica: NY.Google Scholar
  107. Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessMaynooth UniversityMaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations