The Mind is Willing, but the Situation Constrains: Why and When Leader Conscientiousness Relates to Ethical Leadership
While previous research has established that employees who have a more conscientious leader are more likely to perceive that their leader is ethical, the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions of this linkage remain unknown. In order to better understand the relationship between leader conscientiousness and ethical leadership, we examine the potential mediating role of leader moral reflectiveness, as well as the potential moderating role of decision-making autonomy. Drawing from social cognitive theory, results from two samples of workgroup leaders and their immediate reports situated in Africa and Asia show that leader conscientiousness is positively related to leader moral reflectiveness, which in turn, is positively associated with employees’ assessment of ethical leadership. Furthermore, and consistent with our hypothesis, results from the two samples show that leader decision-making autonomy moderates the indirect path from leader conscientiousness to ethical leadership through moral reflectiveness, such that only morally reflective leaders who have high (versus low) decision-making autonomy at work engage in ethical leadership behaviors. In our discussion, we highlight the theoretical and practical implications of our findings and suggest ways in which organizations can better foster ethical leadership.
KeywordsEthical leadership Leader conscientiousness Moral reflectiveness Decision-making autonomy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
- Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Euwema, M., & Ovadje, F. (2016). The relation between ethical leadership and workplace conflicts: The mediating role of employee resolution efficacy. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206316638163.
- Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Camps, J., & Euwema, M. (2017). When do ethical leaders become less effective: The moderating role of perceived leader ethical conviction on employee discretionary reactions to ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3472-z.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154–161.Google Scholar
- Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2(2), 349–444.Google Scholar
- Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175.Google Scholar
- Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003.
- Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16, 250–279.Google Scholar
- Hamamura, T., Heine, S. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (2008). Culture differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932–942.Google Scholar
- Horn, J., Nelson, C. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2004). Integrity, conscientiousness, and honesty. Psychological Reports, 95, 27–38.Google Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Working paper, California State University, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
- Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship: A case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sturm, R. E. (2015). Decreasing unethical decisions: The role of morality-based individual differences. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2787-x.