Skip to main content
Log in

What Do Unions and Employers Negotiate Under the Umbrella of Corporate Social Responsibility? Comparative Evidence from the Italian Metal and Chemical Industries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The corporate social responsibility (CSR) and industrial relations (IR) studies have evolved mostly in parallel. In this paper, we integrate the IR with the CSR perspective, highlighting their similarities and differences. In particular, the study adopts a framework which includes a wide set of CSR-related issues to explore what unions and companies negotiate under the umbrella of CSR. It analyses and compares the national sectoral agreements of two key industries in the Italian economy, i.e. Metal and Chemical. We find that these two sectors exhibit differences because the CSR-related issues covered by the two contracts are formally labelled as CSR in the Chemical contract, and not labelled as CSR in the Metal contract. We also find similarities regarding the CSR-related issues covered and not covered by the national contracts, and the binding processes centrally negotiated for their implementation. We interpret the similarities in light of the specificities of the Italian IR system, and the differences in light of the negotiation traditions of the two sectors under study, which induce the actors in the Metal sector (traditionally with more conflictual IR relations) to focus more on what differentiates the CSR and IR perspectives, and the actors in the Chemical sector (traditionally with more cooperative IR relations) to focus more on what the CSR and IR perspectives share.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Adapted from Brammer 2011

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

IR:

Industrial relations

HRM:

Human resource management

IFA:

International framework agreement

References

  • Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 855–879), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ählström, J. (2010). Corporate response to CSO criticism: Decoupling the corporate responsibility discourse from business practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, N., & Samuel, P. (2009). Partnership agreement adoption and survival in the British private and public sectors. Work, Employment and Society, 23(2), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R., & Wolff, F. (Eds.). (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: Rhetoric and realities. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCG and MIT (2009 September). The business of sustainability: Imperatives, advantages and actions.

  • Bloor, M., Frankland, G., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus group in social research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. (2011). Employment relations and corporate social responsibility. In K. Townsend & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Research handbook on the future of work and employment relations (pp. 296–318). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar Publishing Limited.

  • Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2012). Human resource management: Theory and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, R., & Gearhart, J. (2004). Who should code your conduct? Trade union and NGO differences in the fight for workers’ rights. Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J., & Mahajan, V. (2013). Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. (2004). Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain. ILR Review, 57(2), 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. W., & Spencer, D. A. (2015). Worker well-being and the importance of work: Bridging the gap. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(2), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadio, P. (2010). Contrattazione aziendale integrativa e differenziali salariali territoriali: informazioni dall’indagine sulle imprese della banca d’Italia. Politica Economica, 2, 241–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella, G. (1989). Criteria of regulation in Italian industrial relations: A case of weak institutions. In P. Lange & M. Regini (Eds.), State, market and social regulation: New perspectives on Italy (pp. 167–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauwaert, S. (2011). 2011: 20 years of European interprofessional social dialogue: Achievements and prospects. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 17(2), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colling, T., & Terry, M. (Eds.). (2010). Industrial relations: Theory and practice. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, S., & Regalia, I. (2011). Sindacato e welfare locale. La negoziazione delle politiche sociali in Lombardia nel primo decennio degli anni Duemila: La negoziazione delle politiche sociali in Lombardia nel primo decennio degli anni Duemila. FrancoAngeli, Milano.

  • Colombo, S., & Regalia, I. (2016). The reform and impact of joint regulation and labour market policy during the current crisis: Italy. In A. Koukiadaki, I. Tàvora, & M. Martìnez Lucio (Eds.), Joint regulation and labour market policy in Europe during the crisis. Brussels: Etui.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, S., & Regini, M. (2016). Territorial differences in the Italian ‘social model’. Regional Studies, 50(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2013). Conscience as control–managing employees through CSR. Organization, 20(3), 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Ecological citizenship and the corporation: Politicizing the new corporate environmentalism. Organization and Environment, 21(4), 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, R., Benedictus, H., & Van Der Meer, M. (2005). Broadening without intensification: The added value of the European social and sectoral dialogue. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehnen, V. (2013). Transnational alliances for negotiating international framework agreements: Power relations and bargaining processes between global union federations and European works councils. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(3), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehnen, V., & Pries, L. (2014). International framework agreements: A thread in the web of transnational labour regulation. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentchev, N. A. (2004). Corporate social performance as a business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical orientation to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.——2012, ‘Triangulation, 2, 80–88.

  • Donaghey, J., Reinecke, J., Niforou, C., & Lawson, B. (2014). From employment relations to consumption relations: Balancing labor governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial relations systems, 1958 (p. 399). New York: Henry Holt and Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N. (2009a). TNC motives for signing international framework agreements: A continuous bargaining model of stakeholder pressure. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N. (2009b). Transnational governance of workers’ rights: Outlining a research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N., & Hyllman, P. (2006). Exploring the effects of union–NGO relationships on corporate responsibility: The case of the Swedish clean clothes campaign. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N., & Merk, J. (2014). Private regulation and trade union rights: Why codes of conduct have limited impact on trade union rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (Eds.). (2013). Sustainability and human resource management: Developing sustainable business organizations. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business (new ed.). Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Femca-Cisl. (2014). Terzo rapporto nazionale sulla contrattazione aziendale nel comparto chimico, annual meeting, Firenze 11–12 september 2014.

  • Fichter, M., Helfen, M., & Sydow, J. (2011). Employment relations in global production networks: Initiating transfer of practices via union involvement. Human Relations, 64(4), 599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, W. (1998). Participatory action research: Getting involved and creating surprises at the workplace. Researching the World of Work: Strategies and Methods in Studying Industrial Relations, 127–157.

  • Fox, T., Ward, H., & Howard, B. (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, L. (2011). Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political–institutional analysis of transnational labor standards regulation. Governance, 24(2), 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P. G., & Gaston, N. (1999). The “greening” of trade unions and the demand for eco-taxes. European Journal of Political Economy, 15(4), 663–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D. (2007). Production regimes, employment regimes, and the quality of work. In D. Gallie (Ed.), Employment regimes and the quality of work (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gordon, R. (1998). “Shell No!” OCAW and the labor-environmental alliance. Environmental History, 3(4), 460–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. (2009). I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: Implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., & Rayton, B. (2007). Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4), 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerci, M., & Shani, A. B. (2013). Moving toward stakeholder-based HRM: A perspective of Italian HR managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1130–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, N. (2005). International framework agreements: Global industrial relations between rights and bargaining. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 11(4), 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, A. (2008). The evolution of a global labor governance regime. Governance, 21(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. S., & Jirjahn, U. (2009). Family-friendly practices and worker representation in Germany. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(1), 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, M., & O’Brien, T. (2007). Protest and survive, the UK construction safety campaign: A case study of workers’ and victims’ family action and legal and regulatory inaction on construction health and safety. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13(1), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huzzard, T., & Björkman, H. (2012). Trade unions and action research. Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R., Klarsfeld, A., Ng, E., & Haq, R. (2012). Introduction: Social regulation of diversity and equality. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2011). Censimento dell’industria e dei servizi, www.istat.it.

  • Jamali, D. R., El Dirani, A. M., & Harwood, I. A. (2015). Exploring human resource management roles in corporate social responsibility: the CSR-HRM co-creation model. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. J., & Kim, D. O. (2016). Good neighbors but bad employers: Two faces of corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, D. (2002). The international trade union movement and the new codes of conduct. Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights: Codes of Conduct in the Global Economy, 94.

  • Kaufman, B. (Ed.). (2004). Employment relations and the employment relations system: A guide to theorizing. Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, 41–75.

  • Kolstad, I. (2007). Why firms should not always maximize profits. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T., & Deetz, S. (2008). Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning? In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Leafy, J. T. (2001). Making room for labor in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. (2010). The corporate responsibility code book (2nd ed.). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, E. (2008). European sectoral social dialogue: An analytical framework. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 14(4), 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R. M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: An uneasy merger of sustainability and development. Sustainable Development, 21(2), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R. (2010). Destroying the village to save it: Corporate social responsibility, labour relations, and the rise and fall of American hegemony. Organization, 17(6), 743–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariappanadar, S. (2012). Harm of efficiency oriented HRM practices on stakeholders: An ethical issue for sustainability. Society and Business Review, 7(2), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M., & Morter, N. (1998). Trade unions as environmental actors: The UK transport and general workers’ union∗. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 9(2), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey. (2013). The business of sustainability. London: McKinsey Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthuri, J. N., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niforou, C. (2012). International framework agreements and industrial relations governance: Global rhetoric versus local realities. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(2), 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niforou, C. (2014). International framework agreements and the democratic deficit of global labour governance. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(2), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, D., Spicer, A., & Wright, C. (2013). Incorporating citizens: Corporate political engagement with climate change in Australia. Organization, 20(3), 433–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obach, B. K. (2004). Labor and the environmental movement: The quest for common ground. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OCSEL (2014). Rapporto sulla contrattazione di secondo livello, www.cisl.it.

  • Oecd (2011). Oecd.Stat. www.oecd.org.

  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, K., Casale, G., & Tsotroudi, K. (2008). International framework agreements as elements of a cross-border industrial relations framework. Cross-Border Social Dialogue and Agreements: An Emerging Global Industrial Relations Framework, 67–87.

  • Paulet, E., & Relano, F. (2012). From CSR rhetoric to real business practice: Ethical banking in Scandinavia. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 7(4), 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perin, E., & Léonard, E. (2011). European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 17(2), 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). Recruitment strategies for encouraging participation in corporate volunteer programs. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(4), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2008). A reluctant stakeholder? On the perception of corporate social responsibility among European trade unions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L., Gold, M., & Rees, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and trade unions: Perspectives across Europe. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L., Haunschild, A., & Matten, D. (2006). Trade unions and CSR: A European research agenda. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3–4), 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L., Haunschild, A., & Matten, D. (2009). The rise of CSR: Implications for HRM and employee representation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(4), 953–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, W. T., & Spicer, A. (2006). Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: Institutional investors and global social issues. Strategic Organization, 4(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassier, D. G. (2006). Do trade unions affect compliance with environmental regulation? doi:10.2139/ssrn.889400.

  • Rees, C., Preuss, L., & Gold, M. (2014). 13 European trade unions and CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility and Trade Unions: Perspectives Across Europe, 202–223.

  • Regalia, I. (2014). Labor regulation in small firms: Trends and challenges for economic competitiveness and social sustainability. In 26th SASE annual conference (pp. 10–12). University of Chicago.

  • Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, J. D. (1979). Conflict and social regulation: A sketch of a theory of joint regulation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(3), 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, J. D. (1989). Les règles du jeu. Régulation et action collective. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L. (2005). International framework agreements: A new model for securing workers rights? Industrial relations: A journal of Economy and Society, 44(4), 707–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. M., & Smallman, C. (2006). The contemporary British workplace: A safer and healthier place? Work, Employment and Society, 20(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, T. (2005). Realism or idealism? Corporate social responsibility and the employee stakeholder in the global fast-food industry. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, T., & Ortiz, L. (2009). Dominance effects from local competitors: Setting institutional parameters for employment relations in multinational subsidiaries; a case from the Spanish supermarket sector. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Aguilera, R. V. (2010). Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self- determination, and social influence theories. In Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality (pp. 69–88). New York, Routledge.

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schömann, I. (2007). From CSR to international framework agreements: Towards an internationalization of industrial relations. CSR PAPER: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schömann, I., Sobzack, A., Voss, E., & Wilke, P. (2008). International framework agreements: New paths to workers’ participation in multinationals’ governance? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 14(1), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seguin, N., Weingarten, G. & van Criekingen, L. (2013). Corporate social responsibility—union thinking on the EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. European Trade Union Federation. https://www.etuc.org/IMG/pdf/CES-Brochure_RSE-Uk.pdf.

  • Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(03), 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak, A. (2007). Legal dimensions of international framework agreements in the field of corporate social responsibility. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 62(3), 466–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak, A. (2012). Ensuring the effective implementation of transnational company agreements. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodalitas, (2008). La CSR in Italia. Tendenze in atto, Fondazione Sodalitas, www.sodalitas.it.

  • Streeck, W. (1993). The rise and decline of neo-corporatism. In IIRA (Ed.), Economic and political changes in Europe (pp. 27–62). Bari: Cacucci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telljohann, V., Costa, I. D., Müller, T., Rehfeldt, U., & Zimmer, R. (2009). European and international framework agreements: New tools of transnational industrial relations. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 15(3–4), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. S., & Cotter, J. F. (2007). Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response, and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2), 368–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuffrey, M. (2003). Good Companies, Better Employees-How community involvement and good corporate citizenship can enhance employee morale, motivation, commitment and performance. London: The Corporate Citizenship Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, H. J., III, & Greenwood, M. (2011). Bringing stakeholder theory to industrial relations. Employee Relations, 33(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2005). Wage bargaining institutions in Europe. A happy marriage or preparing for divorce? In Acocella, N., & Leoni, R. (Eds) Social Pacts. Employment and Growth: A Reappraisal of Ezio Tarantelli’s Thought. (pp. 123–156). Springer. Berlin.

  • Visser, J. (2013). Wage Bargaining Institutionsfrom crisis to crisis (No. 488). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

  • Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1897). Industrial democracy, Vol. 2. Longmans, Green, and Company.

  • Weil, D., & Mallo, C. (2007). Regulating labour standards via supply chains: Combining public/private interventions to improve workplace compliance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(4), 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., Davies, S., & Chinguno, C. (2015). Subcontracting and labour standards: Reassessing the potential of international framework agreements. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(2), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, J. (2002). Bargaining for the space to organize in the global economy: A review of the Accor-IUF trade union rights agreement. Review of International Political Economy, 9(4), 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, M., & Tijdens, K. (2010). Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Colombo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colombo, S., Guerci, M. & Miandar, T. What Do Unions and Employers Negotiate Under the Umbrella of Corporate Social Responsibility? Comparative Evidence from the Italian Metal and Chemical Industries. J Bus Ethics 155, 445–462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3503-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3503-9

Keywords

Navigation