In recent years, after various scandals, the role of auditors has been called into question, even casting doubt on whether their reports reliably reflect the true financial situation of the auditee, especially when this situation is not good. Normative changes in the way auditors have to rate certain questions provide a good opportunity to study this problem. These changes have acquired great relevance among the factors involved in studying audit quality. Thus, the present study analyzed the effect of the normative change that took place in Spain in December 2010, related to opinions modified for going-concern uncertainties. Until that date, the auditor’s uncertainty about the company’s going-concern status led to a qualified opinion. However, under the new regulation, it became an opinion that included an explanatory paragraph stating the reasons for concern, which was considered less serious. In all, 152 small- and medium-sized enterprises that had begun bankruptcy proceedings were studied. Expert systems were used for their analysis, based on classification trees assembled through boosting and bagging. In addition, the logistic regression was used as baseline to compare previous methods. The main result obtained was that a change in the norm that catalogs the going-concern issue as less serious made auditors more likely to report this situation, thus questioning the audit quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alfaro, E., Gamez, M., & García, N. (2013). ADABAG: An R package for classification with boosting and bagging. Journal of Statistical Software, 54(2), 1–35.
Altman, E. I. (1983). Corporate financial distress. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests (1)—Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ, 308, 1552. doi:10.1258/phleb.2012.012J05.
Altman, E. I., & Sabato, G. (2007). Modelling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the U.S. market. Abacus, 43(3), 332–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00234.x.
Altman, E. I., Sabato, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). The value of non-financial information in small-sized enterprise risk management. The Journal of Credit Risk, 6(2), 1–33.
Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F., & Sanchez, S. (2008). Going-concern Uncertainties in pre-bankrupt audit reports: New evidence regarding discretionary accruals and wording ambiguity. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 25–44.
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). (2007a). Auditing Standard ASA 570: Going Concern. Melbourne: Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). (2007b). Auditing Standard ASA 701: Modifications to the Auditor′s Report. Melbourne: Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
Barnes, L. (2008). Banking sector governance: Lessons from Hong Kong listed banks. A three years perspective. ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, 7, 22–35.
Bates, T. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: Delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 343–358. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.003.
Bauer, E., & Kohavi, R. (1999). An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning, 36(1–2), 105–139.
Blanco Oliver, A., Irimia, A., & Oliver Alfonso, M. D. (2012). The prediction of bankruptcy of small firms in the UK using logistic regression. Análisis financiero, (118), 32–40. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3992172&orden=354854&info=link%5Cnhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/extart?codigo=3992172
Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 330–352. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.06.007.
Boter, H., & Lundström, A. (2005). SME perspectives on business support services. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(2), 244–258. doi:10.1108/14626000510594638.
Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks, Wadsworth International Group.
Bureau Van Dijk. (2016). SABI. Sistema de Análisis de Balances Ibéricos. https://sabi.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed july 2016.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D., & Huss, F. (1995). Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14, 133–143.
Carcello, J., Hermanson, D. & Huss, F. (1997). The effect of SAS No. 59: How treatment of the transition period influences results. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16, 114–123.
Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95–117.
Carcello, J. V., Vanstraelen, A., & Willenborg, M. (2009). Rules rather than discretion in audit standards: Going-concern opinions in Belgium. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1395–1428. doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1395.
Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., & Mo, P. L. (2006). A political-economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(1), 21–48.
Chen, K. C. W., & Church, B. K. (1992). Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going-concern opinions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(2), 30–50.
Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55–99.
Chrzanowska, M., Alfaro, E., & Witkowska, D. (2009). The individual borrowers recognition: Single and ensemble trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3 PART 2), 6409–6414. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.048.
Chung, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2001). Perceived value of mandatory audits of small companies. Managerial Auditing, 16(3), 120–123.
Collis, J. (2008). Directors’ views on accounting and auditing requirements for SMEs. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
Deangelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(May), 183–199.
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001.
DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 21–40. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.03.002.
Defond, M., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyamk, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002.
Devi, S. S., & Samujh, R. (2010). Accountants as providers of support and advice to SMEs in Malaysia. London: ACCA Research Report.
Dietterich, T. G. (2000). An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees. Machine Learning, 40, 139–157. doi:10.1023/A:1007607513941.
Fargher, N. L., & Jiang, L. (2008). Changes in the audit environment and auditors’ propensity to issue going-concern opinions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 55–77. doi:10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.55.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality?*. The British Accounting Review, 36, 345–368. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality, 30(2), 125–152. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50006.
Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (2002). Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics evidence on auditor risk- management strategies before and after the private securities litigation reform act of 1995. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9(2), 135–157. doi:10.1080/16081625.2002.10510607.
Gaeremynck, A., & Willekens, M. (2003). The endogenous relationship between audit-report type and business termination: Evidence on private firms in a non-litigious environment. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/00014788.2003.9729632.
Galar, M., Fern, A., Barrenechea, E., & Bustince, H. (2012). Hybrid-Based Approaches. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews, 42(4), 463–484.
Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1998). Cost associated with going-concern modified audit opinion: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions and client failures. Advances in Accounting, 16, 117–140.
Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2005). Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior audit opinions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 21–35.
Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2003). Do Spanish firms change auditor to avoid a qualified audit report? International Journal of Auditing, 7(1), 37–53. doi:10.1111/1099-1123.00004.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002.
Gramling, A. A., Krishnan, J. & Zhang, Y. (2011). PCAOB inspections of small accounting firms and auditor reporting decisions. Working Paper, Kennesaw State University.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). Advances in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
Homaie-Shandizi, A.-H., Nia, V. P., Gamache, M., & Agard, B. (2016). Flight deck crew reserve: From data to forecasting. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 50, 106–114. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.028.
Hopwood, W., Mckeown, J. C., & Mutchler, J. F. (1994). A reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going-concern opinion decision*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 409–431.
Ireland, J. C. (2003). An empirical investigation of determinants of audit reports in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30(7–8), 975–1015. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.05417.
King, M. A., Abrahams, A. S., & Ragsdale, C. T. (2015). Ensemble learning methods for pay-per-click campaign management. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(10), 4818–4829. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.047.
Knechel, R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385–421.
Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Sundgren, S. (2008). Determinants of auditor choice: Evidence from a small client market. International Journal of Auditing, 12, 65–88.
Kotsiantis, S. B. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Informatica, 31, 249–268. doi:10.1115/1.1559160.
Krishnan, J. (1994). Auditor switching and conservatism. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 200–2015.
Krishnan, J., Andrishnan, J., & Schauer, P. C. (2000). The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory dating, 19(2), 9–25.
Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/08985620210159220.
Lennox, C. (2000). Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 321–337.
Li, C. (2009). Does client importance effect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 201–230.
Liu, D., Li, T., & Liang, D. (2014). Incorporating logistic regression to decision-theoretic rough sets for classifications. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 55(1 PART 2), 197–210. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2013.02.013.
Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2002). The survival of new domestic and foreign-owned firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 323–343. doi:10.1002/smj.217.
Mo, P. L. L., Rui, O. M., & Wu, X. (2015). ScienceDirect auditors’ going concern reporting in the pre- and post-bankruptcy law eras: Chinese affiliates of Big 4 versus local auditors*. The International Journal of Accounting, 50, 1–30. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2014.12.005.
Morgan, J., & Sonquist, J. (1963). Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 302, 415–434.
Omoteso, K. (2012). The application of artificial intelligence in auditing: Looking back to the future. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8490–8495. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.098.
Pryor, C., & Terza, J. (2002). Are going-concern audit opinions a self-fulfilling prophecy? Advances in quantitative. Analysis of Finance and Accounting, 10, 89–116.
Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1995). Audit reports for companies in financial distress: Before and after SAS no. 59. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14(1), 50–63.
Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gomez-Aguilar, N., & Cabrera-Pena, N. (2009). Derogación de la rotación obligatoria de auditores y calidad de la auditoría*. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, XVII(49), 105–134.
Segura, A. S. (2003). Salvedades y Cambio de Auditor. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 32(119), 983–1012. doi:10.1080/02102412.2003.10779504.
Senkow, D. W., Rennie, M. D., Rennie, R. D., & Wong, J. W. (2001). The audit retention decision in the face of deregulation: Evidence from large private Canadian corporations. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 101–113. doi:10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.101.
Sercu, P., Vander Bauwhede, H., & Willekens, M. (2006). Post-enron implicit audit reporting standards: Sifting through the evidence. De Economist, 154(3), 389–403.
Shmueli, G., Patel, N., & Bruce, P. (2010). Data mining for business intelligence: Concepts, techniques, and applications in microsoft office excel with XLMiner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Tauringana, V., & Clarke, S. (2000). The demand for external auditing: Managerial share ownership, size, gearing and liquidity influences. Managerial Auditing, 15(4), 160–168.
Tsai, C. F., & Chiou, Y. J. (2009). Earnings management prediction: A pilot study of combining neural networks and decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3 PART 2), 7183–7191. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.025.
Vanstraelen, A. N. N. (2003). Going-concern opinions, auditor switching, and the self-fulfilling prophecy effect examined in the regulatory context of Belgium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 18(2), 231–253.
Xu, Y., Carson, E., Fargher, N., & Jiang, L. (2013). Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 53(April 2011), 301–338.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Medina, A.J., Blázquez-Santana, F. & Alonso, J.B. Do Auditors Reflect the True Image of the Company Contrary to the Clients’ Interests? An Artificial Intelligence Approach. J Bus Ethics 155, 529–545 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3496-4
- Reliable image
- Audit quality
- Normative changes
- Classification trees