Advertisement

Do CSR Messages Resonate? Examining Public Reactions to Firms’ CSR Efforts on Social Media

  • Gregory D. Saxton
  • Lina Gomez
  • Zed Ngoh
  • Yi-Pin Lin
  • Sarah Dietrich
Original Paper
  • 960 Downloads

Abstract

We posit a key goal of firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts is to influence reputation through carefully crafted communicative practices. This trend has accelerated with the rise of social media such as Twitter and Facebook, which are essentially public message networks that organizations are leveraging to engage with concerned audiences. Given the large number of messages sent on these sites, only some will be effective and achieve broad public resonance. Building on signaling theory, this paper asks whether and how messages conveying CSR-related topics resonate with the public and, if so, which CSR topics and signal qualities are most effective. We test our hypotheses using data on public reactions to Fortune 500 companies’ CSR-focused Twitter feeds, using the retweeting (sharing) of firms’ messages as a proxy for public resonance. We find resonance is positively associated with messages that convey CSR topics such as the environment or education, those that make the topic explicit through use of hashtags, and those that tap into existing social movement discussions.

Keywords

Corporate reputation Corporate social responsibility CSR CSR communication Signaling theory Social media 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Section Editor Cory Searcy, the two anonymous reviewers, and Chao Guo, Dean Neu, and Edward Walker for helpful comments and suggestions in preparing this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew, J., & Cortese, C. (2011). Accounting for climate change and the self-regulation of carbon disclosures. Accounting Forum, 35, 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65–74). New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Shannon, L. M. (2014). Signalling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1334–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In European Consortium for Political Research, Reykjavik, August 25–27 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Castelló, I., Etter, M., & Nielsen, F. A. (2015). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 402–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. ICWSM, 10, 30.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, S. (2009). Corporate responsibilities in internet enabled social networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colleoni, E. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86, 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Du, S., & Vieira, E. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eberle, D., Berens, G., & Li, T. (2013). The impact of interactive corporate social responsibility communication on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fieseler, C., & Fleck, M. (2013). The pursuit of empowerment through social media: Structural social capital dynamics in CSR-blogging. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fraustino, J., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2015). Corporate associations written on the wall: Publics’ responses to Fortune 500 ability and social responsibility Facebook posts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 452–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W. J. L., Ellerup Nielsen, A., Thomsen, C., & Schultz, F. (2013). CSR communication: Quo vadis? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez-Vásquez, L. (2013). Me gusta o te sigo: Análisis de la comunicación de prácticas de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa a través de los medios sociales. Correspondencias & Análisis, 3, 89–109.Google Scholar
  25. Hetze, K. (2016). Effects on the (CSR) reputation: CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories. Corporate Reputation Review, 19, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, B. G., & Walker, E. T. (2014). Winning hearts and minds: Field theory and the three dimensions of strategy. Strategic Organization, 12, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37, 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, K., Oh, W.-Y., & Kim, N. (2013a). Social media for socially responsible firms: Analysis of Fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR Ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, H.-H. M., Van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2013b). On the role of social media in the “responsible” food business: Blogger buzz on health and obesity issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 695–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: The impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCammon, H. J., Newman, H. D., Muse, C. S., & Terrell, T. M. (2007). Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: The political successes of the U.S. women’s jury movements. American Sociological Review, 72, 725–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review, 87, 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Leary, D. E. (2015). Crowdsourcing tags in accounting and finance: Review, analysis and emerging issues. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders “like” on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 280–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 681–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stefanone, M. A., Saxton, G. D., Egnoto, M. J., Wei, W. X., & Fu, Y. (2015). Image attributes and diffusion via Twitter: The case of #guncontrol. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS), Kauai, HI, January 5–8, 2015.Google Scholar
  45. Utgård, J. (2015). Retail chain’s corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Ethics. Advanced online publication. doi:  10.1007/s10551-015-2952-2.
  46. Walker, E. T., & Rea, C. M. (2014). The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Grant, B. (2013). Corporations and citizenship arenas in the age of social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zahller, K. A., Arnold, V., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). Using CSR disclosure quality to develop social resilience to exogenous shocks: A test of investor perceptions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zerbini, F. (2015). CSR initiatives as market signals: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2922-8.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory D. Saxton
    • 1
  • Lina Gomez
    • 2
  • Zed Ngoh
    • 3
  • Yi-Pin Lin
    • 3
  • Sarah Dietrich
    • 3
  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Social and Human SciencesUniversidad del EsteCarolinaPuerto Rico
  3. 3.Department of CommunicationUniversity at Buffalo, SUNYBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations