Skip to main content
Log in

Do Local Protestant Values Affect Corporate Cash Holdings?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how local Protestant belief, as one type of social norms, affects corporate cash policies. We find that firms located in areas with more Protestants hold less cash reserves. The influence of local Protestant belief on cash holdings is more profound for firms with weak corporate governance and firms with one geographic segment. In addition, we find that the difference in cash deployment is reflected in the difference in firms’ investment and payout policies. Overall, our study shows that local Protestant belief is an important factor in determining corporate cash policies and helps to mitigate the potential free cash flow problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hirshleifer (2014) argues, “Most importantly, there is a need to move from behavioral finance to social finance (and social economics). Social finance includes the study of how social norms, moral attitudes, religions and ideologies affect financial behaviors …”.

  2. Compustat files report only the latest available headquarter location. Heider and Ljungqvist (2015) report that some firms change headquarters. Using the historical headquarter locations from SEC filings, we find that in our sample 5% firms changed headquarter locations, but there is no economically significant change in the Protestants measure. All the test results are robust if we use the historical headquarter locations.

  3. The main results hold if we use the four-year survey data only (1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010).

  4. To alleviate the concern that the relation between cash holdings and local Protestant values is due to the correlation with other denominations, we control for other religious groups or Catholic only. Our results hold with those additional control variables.

  5. Due to the asymmetric distribution of G index and E index, the number of observations in the weak corporate governance group is different from the number of observations in the strong corporate governance group.

  6. We run the regressions of cash holdings on Protestant, interaction of Protestant and corporate governance dummy variables, and other control variables to test whether the coefficients of Protestant between firms with weak corporate governance and firms with strong corporate governance are significantly different. Our untabulated results suggest that the impact of local Protestant values is significantly different between firms with weak governance and firms with strong governance.

  7. We run the regressions of cash holdings on Protestant, interaction of Protestant and geographic segments dummy variables, and other control variables to test the difference in coefficients between firms with one geographic segment and firms with multiple geographic segments. The coefficients of the interaction of Protestant and segment dummy are all significantly negative. The results suggest that the impact of local Protestant values is significantly larger in firms with one geographic segment than that in firms with multiple geographic segments.

References

  • Adhikari, B. K., & Agrawal, A. (2016a). Religion, gambling attitudes and corporate innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, B. K., & Agrawal, A. (2016b). Does local religiosity matter for bank risk-taking? Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, B. (2010). Protestants and Catholics: Similar work ethic, different social ethic. The Economic Journal, 120(547), 890–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance, 64, 1985–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. (2015). Religion and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1–2), 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Dou, P. Y., Rhee, S. G., Truong, C., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). National culture and corporate cash holdings around the world. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. (1998). Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. II, pp. 151–192). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999). Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the lifecycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyreng, S. D., Mayew, W. J., & Williams, C. D. (2012). Religious social norms and corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 39(7–8), 845–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. P. (2010). Religion and corporate (mis)behavior. Working paper, Rice University.

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 225–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halek, M., & Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography of risk aversion. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1969–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford, J., Mansi, S., & Maxwell, W. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Institutional investors and executive compensation. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2351–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W., & Hu, M. R. (2016). Religion and bank loan terms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 64, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Ljungqvist, A. (2015). As certain as debt and taxes: Estimating the tax sensitivity of leverage from state tax changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 118(3), 684–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilary, G., & Hui, K. W. (2009). Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D. A. (2014). Behavioral finance. Working paper.

  • Hutton, I., Jiang, D., & Kumar, A. (2014). Corporate policies of republican managers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(5–6), 1279–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1999). Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 93, 665–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivković, Z., & Weisbenner, S. (2005). Local does as local is: Information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 267–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., John, K., Li, C. W., & Qian, Y. (2015). Earthly reward to the religious: Religiosity and the cost of public and private debt. Available at SSRN 2331401.

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (1998). Religiousness and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen, C. M., & Niessen-Ruenzi, A. (2010). Is executive compensation shaped by public attitudes? AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper.

  • Kumar, A., Page, J., & Spalt, O. (2011). Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 671–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Mauer, D. C. (2011). Corporate cash holdings and CEO compensation incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Schultz, P. (2004). Weather, stock returns, and the impact of localized trading behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(2), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., Omer, T., & Wang, D. (2012). Tax avoidance : does tax – specific industry expertise make a difference? The accounting review, 87(3), 975–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirinsky, C., & Wang, Q. (2006). Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns? The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1991–2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (2003). Culture, openness, and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70, 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96(4), 903–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1905). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huajing Hu.

Appendix: Variable Definitions

Appendix: Variable Definitions

Variable names

Variable definition

Religion variables

 Protestant

The total Protestant adherents in a county divided by total population of that county

Firm characteristics

 Cash/assets

The ratio of cash to total assets

 Cash/NA

The ratio of cash to net assets

 ln(Cash/NA)

The natural logarithm of the ratio of cash to net assets

 Size

The natural logarithm of total assets

 Q

The book value of assets less the book value of equity plus the market value of equity, divided by assets. Market value of equity equals price per share times total number of shares outstanding

 Leverage

The ratio of total debt to total assets

 Cash flow

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less interest, taxes and common dividends, divided by total assets

 Net working capital (NWC)

Non-cash working capital divided by total assets

 Expenditures

Capital expenditure over net property, plant, and equipment

 Dividend dummy

Equal to one for firms that pay dividends during the fiscal year and zero otherwise

 Dividend payout

Cash dividend over total assets

 Repurchase dummy

Equal to one for firms that repurchase shares during the fiscal year and zero otherwise

 R&D

The research and development expense scaled by sales and set equal to zero if R&D is missing

 Industry sigma

The volatility of an industry’s cash flow for a 10-year period. Industries are defined by two-digit SIC codes

 Acquisition

The ratio of acquisitions to total assets, where acquisition expenditures reflect only the cash outflows associated with acquisitions

 Stdan

The annualized standard deviation of the daily return calculated on a yearly basis

 ROA

The ratio of income before extraordinary items over total assets

 Loss

A dummy variable that takes the value of one if ROA is negative and zero otherwise

 Equity repurchase

Equal to one for firms that repurchase shares during the fiscal year and zero otherwise

 Earned equity

The ratio of retained earnings to book equity

 Earnings

The ratio of earnings before interest to total assets

 Tangibility

The ratio of property, plant, and equipment to total assets

 Return

The stock return measured over the fiscal year

 Asset growth

The change in total assets over total assets

 E index

A six-factor firm entrenchment index including staggered boards, limits to shareholder amendments of the bylaws, supermajority requirements for mergers, and supermajority requirements for charter amendments, poison pills, and golden parachute arrangement (Bebchuk, Cohen, and Ferrell 2009)

 G index

G index is related to the prevalence of antitakeover provisions using given governance rules (delay, protection, voting, state, and other) for a total of 24 possible provisions according to Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003). The index has the scale from one to 24

 Block ownership

The total blockholder shares out of the total outstanding shares. Blockholder is defined as an institutional investor with at least 5% of a firm’s outstanding shares

County-level variables

 Education

The percentage of people 25 years and above who have a Bachelor’s, postgraduate, or professional degree

 Male

The ratio of male to female in a county

 Money

Median family income in a county

 Minority

Minority population in a county

 Totpop

The total population of the county

 Married

Proportion of households with a married couple

 Election

A dummy variable equals to one if Democratic candidate received more votes than Republican candidate in the county

 Bank_num

The number of local banks in the county

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, H., Lian, Y. & Zhou, W. Do Local Protestant Values Affect Corporate Cash Holdings?. J Bus Ethics 154, 147–166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3462-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3462-1

Keywords

Navigation