Abstract
In this paper, we explore a popular flexible work arrangement (FWA), home-based telework, in the Indian IT industry. We show how IT managers used the dominant meanings of telework to portray telework as an employee benefit that outweighed the attendant cost—intensified work. While using their discretion to grant telework, the managers drew on this portrayal to orchestrate a negotiated exchange with their subordinates. Consequently, the employees consented to accomplish the intensified work at home in exchange of telework despite their opposition to the intensified work in the office. Thus, whereas the extant studies consider work intensification as an unanticipated outcome of using FWAs, we show how firms may use FWAs strategically to get office-based intensified work accomplished at home. While the dominant argument is that employees reciprocate the opportunity to telework with intensified work, we show a discursively orchestrated negotiation that favors management. A corrective policy measure is to frame telework as an employee right.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term telework had been used to refer to different work arrangements (see Sullivan 2003; Wilks and Billsberry 2007). Specifically, the term telework emphasizes the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in carrying out work from a remote location (satellite offices, neighbor work centers, mobile work, etc.). The term home-based work, or home-anchored worker (Wilks and Billsberry 2007) on the other hand, refers to paid work carried out from home. This also includes precarious work such as outsourced carpet weaving or toy making requiring lower skill levels. Home-based telework refers specifically to telework carried out from home and is further categorized based on frequency into regular, alternate and occasional. However, many scholars refer to home-based telework, as simply telework (see Sullivan 2003; Wilks and Billsberry 2007). Since the term telework is widely popular, for the sake of communication ease, we will use the term telework from now on, even though we are referring specifically to regular home-based telework among non-managerial employees.
Our empirical context is the Information Technology (IT) industry and is different from IT-BPO services industry—call centers or medical transcriptionist.
This excludes supplemental work at home (using the home space for work but only to carry out unfinished work after office hours). This is in line with our participants’ understanding of home-based telework (participants refer to it as ‘work from home’). Since managers in most IT companies in India carry out supplemental work at home, we decided to focus only on telework among non-managerial employees.
We consider managers as representative of the management since they took decision related to the use of telework on behalf of the management.
According to the Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) Prowess database (http://prowess.cmie.com/).
To maintain anonymity, we have used pseudonyms for the research participants and their organizations.
In this particular study, we did not explore the underlying reasons since our specific focus here was on managers’ use of telework and its dominant meanings, and not on employee action per se.
See Footnote 7.
Abbreviations
- FWAs:
-
Flexible Work Arrangements
- IT:
-
Information Technology
- OLH:
-
Odd and/or Long Work Hours
References
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586822.
Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. New Delhi: Duke University Press.
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400.
Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34–49. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00063.
Bathini, D. R., & Kandathil, G. (2015). Work from home: A boon or a bane? The missing piece of employee cost. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(4), 568–574.
Belmi, P., & Pfeffer, J. (2015). How “organization” can weaken the norm of reciprocity: The effects of attributions for favors and a calculative mindset. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(1), 36–57. doi:10.5465/amd.2014.0015.
Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2014). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, Employment and Society, 28(6), 963–984. doi:10.1177/0950017013512714.
Broadfoot, K. J. (2001). When the cat’s away, do the mice play?: Control/autonomy in the virtual workplace. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 110–114. doi:10.1177/0893318901151006.
Burchell, B., Ladipo, D., & Wilkinson, F. (2005). Job insecurity and work intensification. London: Routledge.
Carmel, E. (2006). Building your information systems from the other side of the world: How Infosys manages time zone differences. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(1), 43–53.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New Delhi: Sage.
Cooper, R., & Baird, M. (2015). Bringing the “right to request” flexible working arrangements to life: From policies to practices. Employee Relations, 37(5), 568–581. doi:10.1108/ER-07-2014-0085.
Deetz, S. A., & Eger, E. K. (2014). Developing a metatheoretical perspective for organizational communication studies. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 27–48). New York: SAGE. Accessed 5 Aug 2016.
Dimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: Supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 181–195. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00120.
Ellison, N. B. (2004). Telework and social change: How technology is reshaping the boundaries between home and work. New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Fairris, D., & Brenner, M. (2001). Workplace transformation and the rise in cumulative trauma disorders: Is there a connection? Journal of Labor Research, 22(1), 15–28. doi:10.1007/s12122-001-1001-3.
Felstead, A., & Jewson, N. (2000). In work, at home: Towards an understanding of homeworking. London: Taylor & Francis.
Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why work–life balance now? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 387–400. doi:10.1080/09585190601167441.
Green, F. (2001). It’s been a hard day’s night: The concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(1), 53–80. doi:10.1111/1467-8543.00189.
IBM. (2011). Frustration rising: IBM 2011 commuter pain survey (Survey). http://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/attachment/35314.wss?fileId=ATTACH_FILE1&fileName=Frustration%20Rising_IBM%202011%20Commuter%20Pain%20Report.pdf
Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106. doi:10.1177/0018726709349199.
Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62(6), 795–827.
Lewis, S. (2003). The integration of paid work and the rest of life. Is post-industrial work the new leisure? Leisure Studies, 22(4), 343–345. doi:10.1080/02614360310001594131.
Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a “work–life balance” approach: An international perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 360–373. doi:10.1080/09585190601165577.
Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Perspective-making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19(6), 907–918. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0398.
Lowe, G. S., & Schellenberg, G. (2001). What’s a good job? The importance of employment relationships. CPRN study. changing employment relationships series. ERIC. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED468464. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.
Mescher, S., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Representations of work–life balance support. Human Relations, 63(1), 21–39. doi:10.1177/0018726709349197.
Mirchandani, K. (2000). “The best of both worlds” and “cutting my own throat”: Contradictory images of home-based work. Qualitative Sociology, 23(2), 159–182.
Moe, K., & Shandy, D. (2010). Glass ceilings and 100-hour couples: What the opt-out phenomenon can teach us about work and family. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Nadeem, S. (2009). The uses and abuses of time: Globalization and time arbitrage in India’s outsourcing industries. Global Networks, 9(1), 20–40. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00240.x.
NASSCOM. (2013). The IT-BPM sector in India: Strategic review 2013 (Industry report).
Pathak, A. A., Bathini, D. R., & Kandathil, G. M. (2015). The ban on working from home makes sense for Yahoo. Human Resource Management International Digest, 23(3), 12–14. doi:10.1108/HRMID-03-2015-0052.
Peirce, C. S. (1978). Pragmatism and abduction. In C. Hart-shorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers (Vol. V, pp. 180–212). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peters, P., den Dulk, L., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work–life balance: The Dutch case. Community, Work and Family, 12(3), 279–298.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. doi:10.1177/0018726713495704.
Richman, A., Civian, J., Shannon, L., Hill, E. J., & Brennan, R. (2008). The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work-life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 183–197.
Sullivan, C. (2003). What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 158–165. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00118.
Taskin, L., & Devos, V. (2005). Paradoxes from the individualization of human resource management: The case of telework. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 13–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-8710-0.
Taskin, L., & Edwards, P. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 195–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00194.x.
Tietze, S., & Musson, G. (2002). When “work” meets “home” temporal flexibility as lived experience. Time and Society, 11(2–3), 315–334. doi:10.1177/0961463X02011002008.
Upadhya, C. (2009). Controlling offshore knowledge workers: Power and agency in India’s software outsourcing industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(1), 2–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00215.x.
Upadhya, C., & Vasavi, A. R. (2008). In an outpost of the global economy: Work and workers in India’s information technology industry. New Delhi: Routledge.
Van Buren, H. J., III, Greenwood, M., & Sheehan, C. (2011). Strategic human resource management and the decline of employee focus. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 209–219. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.004.
Van Echtelt, P., Glebbeek, A., Lewis, S., & Lindenberg, S. (2009). Post-Fordist work: A man’s world? Gender and working overtime in the Netherlands. Gender and Society, 23(2), 188–214.
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308376.
Wilks, L., & Billsberry, J. (2007). Should we do away with teleworking? An examination of whether teleworking can be defined in the new world of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(2), 168–177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00191.x.
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor and the two anonymous reviewers, and Martin Parker for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. We also thank Neharika Vohra and Pradyumana Khokle for advice during the course of this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bathini, D.R., Kandathil, G.M. An Orchestrated Negotiated Exchange: Trading Home-Based Telework for Intensified Work. J Bus Ethics 154, 411–423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3449-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3449-y