Skip to main content

Comprehending the Cultural Causes of English Writing Plagiarism in Chinese Students at a Western-Style University

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative study of 401 students is to identify common motivations for Chinese students to plagiarize on written English assignments and ultimately to demystify and understand the mindset of Chinese students who do plagiarize. According to a regression analysis of these data, the most significant factor relating to likelihood to self-report plagiarism for Chinese students is the belief in a “standard answer,” which represents the correct answer to a given question. The regression results also suggest that students who believe that imitation of experts is important to learning are more likely to self-report plagiarism, and that business students are more likely to self-report than non-business students. The other factors examined in our model, such as English writing ability; ability to express one’s self in English writing; embarrassment about English writing ability; concern for accuracy of English writing; and concerns about grade point average, were not significant predictors of self-reported plagiarism. These results give a key insight into the English writing plagiarism behaviors of Chinese students studying in Western higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Brown, B., & Choong, P. (2003). A comparison of academic dishonesty among business students in a public and private Catholic university. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 12(1), 27–48. doi:10.1080/10656210309484942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Choong, P. (2005). An investigation of academic dishonesty among business students at public and private United States universities. International Journal of Management, 22(2), 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugeja, M. (2004). Don’t let students “overlook” Internet plagiarism. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 70(2), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, U. S. C. (n.d.). Equal Employment Opportunity Tabulation, Table EEO-ALL01R. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/people/eeotabulation/data/eeotables20062010.html

  • Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner—A question of style. Education+ Training, 41, 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasegaran, A. (2000). Cultures in contact in academic writing: Students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 10, 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, V. L., Hanna, R. C., & Peterson, R. A. (2009). The cheating culture: A global societal phenomenon. Business Horizons, 52(4), 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, L. G., Blount, K. D., & Ferrell, C. M. (1991). Academic misconduct among teacher education students: A descriptive-correlational study. Research in Higher Education, 32, 703–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Eastman, K. L. (2006). Addressing academic dishonesty: The implications for business schools, professors, and students. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 9, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, A., Clegg, S., & Macdonald, R. (2006). Exploring staff perceptions of student plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(02), 145–156. doi:10.1080/03098770600617562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Plagiarism and second language writing in an electronic age. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 161–183. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getty, L. (2011). False assumptions: The challenges and politics of teaching in China. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 347–352. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.560058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, S., & Gao, H. (2002). Pan Gu’s paradigm: Chinese education’s return to holistic communication in learning. In X. Lu, W. Jia, & R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication studies: Contexts and comparisons (pp. 227–244). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics and Behavior, 15(3), 213–231. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. (2014). Number of international college students continues to climb. U.S. News & World Report.

  • Heuchert, D. (2004). On my honor: Report spotlights cheating accusation. Retrieved from http://www.virginia.edu/topnews/11_15_2004/honor.html

  • Holmes, P. (2004). Negotiating differences in learning and intercultural communication: Ethnic Chinese students in a New Zealand university. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(3), 294–307. doi:10.1177/1080569904268141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2012). Investigating Chinese university students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward plagiarism from an integrated perspective. Language Learning, 62(3), 813–850. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00650.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2015). Rote learning harms students’ courage. Global Times. Retrieved from www.globaltimes.cn/content/939204.shtml

  • Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1996). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). Levels of cheating and plagiarism remain high. Honor codes and modified codes are shown to be effective in reducing academic misconduct. Center for Academic Integrity. Duke University, Clemson, South Carolina.

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. (1992). Cheating: Is academic dishonesty par for the course? Prism, 1(7), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, R., Anderson, R. E., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2000). The perceived importance of sales managers’ rewards: A career stage perspective. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(7), 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming, Z. (2012). What’s wrong with Chinese education. Worldcrunch. Retrieved from www.worldcrunch.com/culture-society/what-s-wrong-with-chinese-education/c3s5799/

  • Mooney, P. (2006). Plagued by plagiarism. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(37), A45–A46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappamihiel, N. E. (1999). The development of an English language anxiety assessment instrument for Mexican middle school English language learners. (Doctorate), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students–literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2015). Plagiarism in second language writing: Is it time to close the case? Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 269–302. doi:10.1017/S0261444814000056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian university. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227–264. doi:10.1177/0033688211421417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, U. H., & Xiaofeng, S. (2014). China’s educational challenge when going global. Fair Observer. Retrieved from www.fairobserver.com/region/asia_pacific/chinas-educational-challenge-when-going-global-01470

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). “Not necessarily a bad thing…”: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465–479. doi:10.1080/02602930701563104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2006). Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness, 15(4), 264–282. doi:10.2167/la406.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, J., Scott, D., Sperling, R., & Higgins, T. (2009). Rewards communication in Australia and the United States: A survey of policies and programs. Compensation & Benefits Review, 41, 14–26. doi:10.1177/088636870934668610.1177/0886368709346686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. (2008). What plagiarism was not: Some preliminary observations on classical Chinese attitudes toward what the West calls intellectual property. Marquette Law Review, 92, 199–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). The tangled web: Internet plagiarism and international students’ academic writing. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. C., & Williams, P. G. (1995). But I changed three words! Plagiarism in the ESL classroom. Clearing House, 69, 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., & Low, G. D. (2012). To what extent are postgraduate students from China prepared for academic writing needed on UK master’s courses? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(3), 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukpebor, C. O., & Ogbebor, A. (2013). Internet and plagiarism: Awareness, attitude and perception of students of secondary schools. International Research: Journal of Library & Information Science, 3(2), 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, S. (2015). Open doors 2015: International students in the U.S. up ten percent to nearly one million; highest rate of growth in 35 years; increases reported in 44 states. Study abroad by American students picks up momentum [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/en/Who-We-Are/News-and-Events/Press-Center/Press-Releases/2015/2015-11-16-Open-Doors-Data

  • Xiang, Z. (2015). Education reform key to mass innovation. China Daily. Retrieved from www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015twosession/2015-03/11/content_19783458.htm

  • Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved from http://www.dictionary.com

  • Software, B. T. (n.d.). Babylon 10 Online Dictionary. Retrieved from http://dictionary.babylon-software.com

  • Yan, S. (2016). Chinese flock to America to work for companies they’ve bought. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/21/news/economy/china-u-s-expat-visas/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria J. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

James, M.X., Miller, G.J. & Wyckoff, T.W. Comprehending the Cultural Causes of English Writing Plagiarism in Chinese Students at a Western-Style University. J Bus Ethics 154, 631–642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3441-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3441-6

Keywords

  • Plagiarism
  • Chinese students
  • Standard answer
  • Imitation of experts
  • Culture