“Thinking Outside the Packaging Box”: Should Brands Consider Store Shelf Context When Eliminating Overpackaging?
- 234 Downloads
Governmental policies are encouraging companies to reduce the environmental impact of their packaging and particularly overpackaging, which raises a broad range of ethical considerations. However, experiments comparing an overpackaged product with a non-overpackaged product have shown that eliminating overpackaging may have a negative influence on brand image and consumer purchase intention. In this paper, we draw on attribution theory to examine the influence of the absence (vs. presence) of overpackaging on consumers’ response, depending on their environmental consciousness and the absence (vs. presence) of overpackaging on the competing product. An experiment conducted on 218 consumers demonstrates that non-overpackaging for a target product only adversely affects purchase intention among non-environmentally conscious consumers when competing products are overpackaged. These results lead to optimistic recommendations for marketing managers and public policy makers to help them solve the ethical dilemma linked to overpackaging.
KeywordsConsumer behavior Ethical dilemma Overpackaging Environmental consciousness Context effects Attribution
This study was funded by Movida research programme of French Ministry of Environment, Sustainable Development and Energy.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., Fadika, L., Hauff, V., et al. (1987). Our common future (‘Brundtland report’). Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.citeulike.org/group/13799/article/13602458.
- CNE. (2007). Emballages et suremballages des yaourts et autres produits laitiers ultra-frais. Retrieved February 26, 2016 from http://www.premier-web.com/cne/new/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/8.pdf.
- Dannon. (2011). Alléger le poids des emballages. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://danone10.danone.com/rubrique/#societe/3._emballage_vert_3.
- Dichter, E. (1964). Handbook of consumer motivation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency. (2013). Recycling rates in Europe. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/what/public-events/competitions/waste-smart-competition/recycling-rates-in-europe/view.
- Eurostat. (2015). Packaging waste statistics. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Packaging_waste_statistics.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, M. P., Thorhsbury, S., & Twede, D. (2007). Packaging as a tool for product development: Communicating value to consumers. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 38(1), 61–66.Google Scholar
- Gordon, A., Finlay, K., & Watts, T. (1994). The psychological effects of colour in consumer product packaging. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 3–11.Google Scholar
- Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Iglesias, O., & Ind, N. (2016). How to be a brand with a conscience. In N. Ind & S. Horlings (Eds.), Brands with a conscience: How to build a successful and responsible brand (pp. 203–211). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.Google Scholar
- Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
- LSA. (2013). Le marché bio de l’ultrafrais a encore de belles perspectives. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.lsa-conso.fr/le-marche-bio-de-l-ultrafrais-a-encore-de-belles-perspectives,143939.
- O’Malley, J. R., Jr., & Tech, V. (1996). Consumer attributions of product failures to channel members. In K. P. Corfman & J. G. Lynch Jr. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 23, pp. 342–345). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., & Russell, C. (2015). Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 107–134.Google Scholar
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown Company Publishers.Google Scholar
- Pieters, R. G., Bijmolt, T., van Raaij, F., & de Kruijk, M. (1998). Consumers’ attributions of pro-environmental behavior, motivation, and ability to self and others. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17(2), 215–225.Google Scholar
- Schwepker, C. H., & Cornwell, B. T. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
- SEVADEC. (2015). Lutte contre le suremballage. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.sevadec.fr/images/ressource/lutte_contre_suremballage.pdf.