The Ethics of Predatory Journals
- 763 Downloads
Predatory journals operate as vanity presses, typically charging large submission or publication fees and requiring little peer review. The consequences of such journals are wide reaching, affecting the integrity of the legitimate journals they attempt to imitate, the reputations of the departments, colleges, and universities of their contributors, the actions of accreditation bodies, the reputations of their authors, and perhaps even the generosity of academic benefactors. Using a stakeholder analysis, our study of predatory journals suggests that most stakeholders gain little in the short run from such publishing and only the editors or owners of these journals benefit in the long run. We also discuss counter-measures that academic and administrative faculty can employ to thwart predatory publishing.
The study was completed independently without a source of funding.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Alexander McLeod, Arline Savage and Mark Simkin declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Balson, R. H. (2013). Bestseller success stories that started out as self-published books. Huff Post Books (10/08/2013). Retrieved http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronald-h-balson/bestseller-success-storie_b_4064574.html.
- Beall, J. (2014). Bogus journal accepts profanity-laced anti-spam paper [Electronic resource]. Scholarly Open Access: Internet blog. Retrieved http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/20/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-lacedantispam-paper.
- Beall, J. (2015b). Beall’s list. Retrieved http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/.
- Bornemann, E. (2013). Exposing predatory publishers. Information Today, 30(6), 13.Google Scholar
- Brooks, L. J., & Dunn, P. (2004). Business & professional ethics (7th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western College.Google Scholar
- Butler, D. (1999). The writing is on the web for science journals in print. Nature, 397(6716), 195–200.Google Scholar
- Davis, P. (2009). Open access publisher accepts nonsense manuscript for dollars. The Scholarly Kitchen, 10, 10.Google Scholar
- Elliot, C. (2012). On predatory publishers: A Q&A with Jeffrey Beall. Chronicle of Higher Education—Blogs. Retrieved http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/on-predatory-publishers-a-qa-with-jeffrey-beall/47667.
- Fitzgerald, J. (2013). Notable moments in self-publishing history: A timeline. Poets and Writers Magazine (November/December). Retrieved http://www.pw.org/content/notable_moments_in_selfpublishing_history_a_timeline.
- Gale Cengage Learning, “Academic OneFile,” Gale Cengage Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do?Ntt=onefile|129663692219470930731132330063644714.
- Garfield, E. (1996). An old proposal for a new profession: scientific reviewing. The Scientist, 10(16), 12–13.Google Scholar
- Kolata, G. (2013, April 7). Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). New York Times.Google Scholar
- Lakhotia, S. C. (2015). Predatory journals and academic pollution. Current Science, 108(8), 1407–1408.Google Scholar
- Mathews, D. (2015). Scholars detect eightfold rise in ‘predatory’ journal papers. Times Higher Education, 2223, 11–12.Google Scholar
- McQuarie, F. (2015). Predatory journals: An experiment. All About Work: News & Views on Work and Organizations. http://allaboutwork.org/2015/01/26/predatory-journals-an-experiment/.
- Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American Research University. No. 475. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, K. (2015, May 19). Re: Pay-to-Publish Journals. A blog on the AACSB website on the topic of pay-to-publish journals.Google Scholar
- Shaw, C. (2013, October 4). Hundreds of open access journals accept face science paper. Guardian Professional.Google Scholar
- Suber, P. (2009). Ten challenges for open-access journals. SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 138. Retrieved https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4316131/suber_10challenges.html?sequence=2.