Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 2, pp 547–568 | Cite as

Governance Structure and the Credibility Gap: Experimental Evidence on Family Businesses’ Sustainability Reporting

  • Josh Wei-Jun Hsueh
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the success of corporate communication in voluntary sustainability reporting. Existing studies have focused on the perspective of the communicators but lack an understanding of the perspective of information recipients to clearly evaluate this interactive communication process. This paper looks at the issue of a credibility gap perceived by external stakeholders when they doubt the authenticity of communicated information due to the reporting company’s governance structure. The paper uses family businesses to exemplify the emergence of such a gap when outsiders become concerned about the potential agency problem of the integrated ownership and management controlled by a few members of the same family. Following source credibility theory, these concerns raise a credibility gap associated with a family firm’s trustworthiness and goodwill, even if the family has the expertise to carry out sustainability reporting. The findings of two experimental studies indicate that family businesses suffer a greater credibility gap than non-family businesses. An external and independent assurance service can mitigate such gaps, especially when the service is comprehensive and targets family businesses. The paper provides a complete view evaluating corporate communication by looking at the interaction between the communicating company and the information recipients.

Keywords

Assurance Credibility gap External stakeholder Family business Governance structure Sustainability reporting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the feedback of Carlo Salvato about the whole paper, the suggestions of Zachary Estes about the methods, and the advice of Vanessa Strike regarding the earlier version of the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research and authorship of this article.

References

  1. AccountAbility. (2008). AA1000 Assurance Standard 2008. London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar
  2. Ackers, B., & Eccles, N. S. (2015). Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4), 515–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, A., Chen, T.-Y., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 238–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axjonow, A., Ernstberger, J., & Pott, C. (in press). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on corporate reputation: A non-professional stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, A., Owen, D. L., & Gray, R. (2000). External transparency or internal capture? The role of third-party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballesta, J. P. S., & García-Meca, E. (2005). Audit qualifications and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(7), 725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bingham, J. B., Dyer, W. G., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2010). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 565–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd, B. K., & Solarino, A. M. (2016). Ownership of corporations: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1282–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, P., Brunsden, J., & Inagaki, K. (2016). Car industry left reeling by multiple investigations. Financial Times, April 27. London.Google Scholar
  13. Campopiano, G., & Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chau, G. K., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coffee, J. C. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collison, D., & Gray, R. (1997). Auditors’ responses to emerging issues: A UK perspective on the statutory financial auditor and the environment. International Journal of Auditing, 1(2), 135–149.Google Scholar
  18. Connors, S., Anderson-MacDonald, S., & Thomson, M. (in press). Overcoming the “window dressing” effect: Mitigating the negative effects of inherent skepticism towards corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  19. Cornelissen, J. (2004). Corporate communications: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Curtis, E., & Turley, S. (2007). The business risk audit—A longitudinal case study of an audit engagement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Beelde, I., & Tuybens, S. (2015). Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(3), 190–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher, C. D., Ilgen, D. R., & Hoyer, W. D. (1979). Source credibility, information favorability, and job offer acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 94–103.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: Opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gong, G., Xu, S., & Gong, X. (in press). On the value of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An empirical investigation of corporate bond issues in China. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  32. Gray, R. R. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability, 10(3), 325–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4(3), 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hair, J. F. H. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. Harrison, J. S., & van der Laan Smith, J. (2015). Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 935–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hasan, M., Roebuck, P. J., & Simnett, R. (2003). An investigation of alternative report formats for communicating moderate levels of assurance. Auditing, 22(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian Accounting Review, 19(3), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. International Federation of Accountants. (2013). International standard on assurance engagements (ISAE) 3000 revised, assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. New York: International Federation of Accountants.Google Scholar
  41. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., & Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research methods in social relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  43. Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keim, G. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations and business-government relations: The importance of institutions. In H. Teegen & J. P. Doh (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society (pp. 19–34). London: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  45. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.Google Scholar
  46. KPMG. (2015). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015 (No. 132962). The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, K.-H. (in press). Does size matter? Evaluating corporate environmental disclosure in the Australian mining and metal industry: A combined approach of quantity and quality measurement. Business Strategy and the Environment.Google Scholar
  48. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manetti, G., & Becatti, L. (2009). Assurance services for sustainability reports: Standards and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Supplement 1), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin, D. W. (2007). Doing psychology experiments. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  52. Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (in press). The level of sustainability assurance: The effects of brand reputation and industry specialisation of assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  53. Mock, T. J., Strohm, C., & Swartz, K. M. (2007). An examination of worldwide assured sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(41), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, Bernard. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Niemi, L. (2004). Auditor size and audit pricing: Evidence from small audit firms. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1230–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance: An examination of recent sustainability assurance practice. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Reilly, C. A., & Roberts, K. H. (1976). Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ortas, E., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Álvarez Etxeberria, I. (2015). Financial factors influencing the quality of corporate social responsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pagano, M., & Röell, A. (1998). The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Perloff, R. M. (2010). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Pflugrath, G., Roebuck, P., & Simnett, R. (2011). Impact of assurance and assurer’s professional affiliation on financial analysts’ assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Power, M. (1997). Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2007). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 47–64.Google Scholar
  73. Romero, S., Fernandez-Feijoo, B., & Ruiz, Silvia. (2014). Perceptions of quality of assurance statements for sustainability reports. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 480–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Salvato, C., & Moores, K. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23(3), 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schelluch, P., & Gay, G. (2006). Assurance provided by auditors? Reports on prospective financial information: Implications for the expectation gap. Accounting & Finance, 46(4), 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F., & Demir, M. (in press). Enhancing the role and effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The missing element of content verification and integrity assurance. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  78. Shanker, M. C., & Astrachan, J. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy—A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2005). The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: Does source credibility matter? Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 590–591.Google Scholar
  83. Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., Gregory, K., & Convery, S. (in press). A comparison of Canadian and U.S. CSR strategic alliances, CSR reporting, and CSR performance: Insights into implicit–explicit CSR. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  84. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  85. Wallage, P. (2000). Assurance on sustainability reporting: An auditor’s view. Auditing, 19(s-1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang, K. T., & Li, D. (2016). Market reactions to the first-time disclosure of corporate social responsibility reports: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(4), 661–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiseman, R. M., Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zientara, P. (in press). Socioemotional wealth and corporate social responsibility: A critical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations