This article analyzes the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) under the conceptual framework of explicit versus implicit corporate social responsibility (CSR) to better understand the operational and governance challenges behind this voluntary global initiative. Using institutional logics theory, we show how the UNGC is a practice that embodies seemingly competing logics. We suggest mechanisms to facilitate the interplay of implicit/explicit CSR and the co-existence of logics that might allow the UNGC to move forward while addressing its critics. We argue that failure to conceptualize the UNGC as a combination of explicit and implicit CSR leaves the UNGC subject to criticism that might be better directed toward organizations that fail to practice explicit CSR. While viewing the UNGC through an integrated CSR framework may not immediately reconcile its critics and proponents, combining elements of both may provide opportunities to posit collaborative solutions to improve the quality, outcome, and legitimacy of UNGC initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbot, D., & Monsen, R. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a measure of corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515.
ABIS and Ashridge Business School. (2013). Review of United Nations Global Compact LEAD pilot phase. Brussels: ABIS.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.
Albareda, L. (2013). CSR governance innovation: standard competition-collaboration dynamic. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 551–568.
Annan, K. (1999, January). UN Global Compact. In World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. UN Press Release.
Arevalo, J. A., & Aravind, D. (2010). The impact of the crisis on corporate responsibility: The case of UN global compact participants in the USA. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 406–420.
Arevalo, J. A., Aravind, D., Ayuso, S., & Roca, M. (2013). The global compact: An analysis of the motivations of adoption in the Spanish context. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(1), 1–15.
Barkemeyer, R. (2009). Beyond compliance—Below expectations? CSR in the context of international development. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(3), 273–289.
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304–1320.
Bennie, L., Bernhagen, P., & Mitchell, N. J. (2007). The logic of transnational action: The good corporation and the global compact. Political Studies, 55, 733–753.
Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2012). From norms to programs: The United Nations Global Compact and global governance. Regulation and Governance, 6(2), 149–166.
Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 864–888.
Buono, A. (2014). Setting the stage: Facilitating global partnerships for a better world. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 79(4), 4–7.
Christensen, L. J., Mackey, A., & Whetten, D. (2014). Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 164–178.
Clark, C., & Brown, J. A. (2014). Multinational corporations and governance effectiveness: Toward a more integrative board. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(3), 565–577.
Cohen, J. (2001). The world’s business: The United Nations and the globalisation of corporate citizenship. In J. Andriof & M. McIntrosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (Vol. 185, No. 198, pp. 185–198). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Davidson, P. E. (2016). The infinite power of polarities. In D. Jamieson, R. Barnett, & A. F. Buono (Eds.), Consultation for organizational change revisited, pp. 255–279. Charlotte, NC: Information Age (in press).
Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, G. F., & Thompson, T. A. (1994). A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 141–173.
Driscoll, C. (1996). Fostering constructive conflict management in a multistakeholder context: The case of the forest round table on sustainable development. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(2), 156–172.
Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114–149.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fussler, C., Cramer, A., & Van der Vegt, S. (Eds.). (2004). Raising the bar: Creating value with the UN Global Compact. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Gitsham, M., & Page, N. (2014). Designing effective multi-stakeholder collaborative platforms: Learning from the experience of the UN Global Compact LEAD initiative. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 79(4), 18–28.
Glynn, M. A., & Raffaelli, R. (2013). Logic pluralism, organizational design, and practice adoption: The structural embeddedness of CSR programs. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B. Research in the sociology of organizations: Structured attention through values identification (Vol. 39, pp. 175–197). Bingley: Emerald Group.
Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.
Haack, P., & Scherer, A. G. (2014). Why sparing the rod does not spoil the child: A critique of the “Strict Father” model in transnational governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 225–240.
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77.
Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1606–1651.
Hemphill, T. A. (2005). The United Nations Global Compact: The business implementation and accountability challenge. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 303–316.
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1(4), 598–614.
Jackson, K. (2008). Natural law, human rights and corporate reputational capital in global governance. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 8(4), 440–455.
Jarzabkowski, P., Matheissen, J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2009). Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 284–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, B. (1992). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Johnson, B. (2014). Reflections: A perspective on paradox and its application to modern management. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 206–212.
Junaid, N., Leung, O., & Buono, A. F. (2015). Institutionalization or decoupling? An exploratory analysis of the UN Global Compact LEAD Initiative. Business and Society Review, 120(4), 491–518.
Kanter, R. M. (1999). From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 123–132.
Kell, G. (2013). 12 Years later reflections on the growth of the UN Global Compact. Business and Society, 52(1), 31–52.
Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review Psychology, 57, 1–26.
Knudsen, J. S. (2011). Company delistings from the UN Global Compact: Limited business demand or domestic governance failure? Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 331–349.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Laczniak, G. R., & Kennedy, A.-M. (2011). Hyper norms searching for a global code of conduct. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(3), 245–256.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255–266.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 280–307.
Manderscheid, S. V., & Freeman, P. D. (2012). Managing polarity, paradox and dilemma during leadership transition. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(9), 856–872.
Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
McCarthy, D. J., Puffer, S. M., Dunlap, D. R., & Jaeger, A. M. (2012). A stakeholder approach to the ethicality of BRIC-firm managers’ use of favors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 27–38.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.
Misutka, P. J., Coleman, C., Jennings, P. D., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Processes for retrenching logics: The Alberta Oil Sands case, 2008–2011. In Institutional logics in action, Part A: Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 39, pp. 131–163). Bingley: Emerald Group.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823–841.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.
Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Post, J. E. (2013). The United Nations Global Compact: A CSR milestone. Business and Society, 52(1), 53–63.
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235–248.
Rasche, A. (2009). “A necessary supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact is and is not. Business and Society, 48(4), 511–537.
Rasche, A. (2012). Global policies and local practice: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(04), 679–708.
Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267.
Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2014). Global sustainability governance and the UN Global Compact: A rejoinder to critics. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 209–216.
Rasche, A., Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2012). The United Nations Global Compact retrospect and prospect. Business and Society, 52(1), 6–30.
Rao, H., & Giorgi, S. (2006). Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 269–304.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351–384.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
Ruggie, J. G. (2001). Global_governance.net: The global compact as learning network. Global Governance, 7(4), 371–378.
Runhaar, H., & Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 479–495.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row.
Seo, M., & Creed, D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 222–247.
Sethi, S. P. (2011). Globalization and self-regulation: The crucial role that corporate codes of conduct play in global business. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sethi, S. P., & Schepers, D. H. (2014). United Nations Global Compact: The promise–performance gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 193–208.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.
Sloan, P., & Oliver, D. (2013). Building trust in multi-stakeholder partnerships: Critical emotional incidents and practices of engagement. Organization Studies, 34(12), 1835–1868.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Institutionalising the network form: How life scientists legitimate work in the biotechnology industry. Sociological Forum, 20(2), 271–299.
Soundararajan, V., & Brown, J. (2015). Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2418.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional conditions for diffusion. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism (pp. 100–110). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Thérien, J. P., & Pouliot, V. (2006). The global compact: Shifting the politics of international development. Global Governance, 12, 55–75.
Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81–101.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.
UN Global Compact. (2013). Architects of a better world: Building the post-2015 business engagement architecture. New York: United Nations Global Compact.
UN Global Compact. (2015). www.unglobalcompact.org.
Useem, M. (1993). Executive defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vidal, N., Kozak, R. A., & Hansen, E. (2015). Adoption and implementation of corporate responsibility practices: A proposed framework. Business and Society, 54(5), 701–717.
Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 57–69.
Voegtlin, C., & Pless, N. M. (2014). Global governance: CSR and the role of the UN Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 179–191.
Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.
Waldorff, S. B., Reay, T., & Goodrick, E. (2013). A tale of two countries: How different constellations of logics impact action. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part A: Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 39, pp. 99–129). Bingley: Emerald Group.
Williams, O. F. (2014). The United Nations Global Compact: What did it promise? Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 241–251
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, J.A., Clark, C. & Buono, A.F. The United Nations Global Compact: Engaging Implicit and Explicit CSR for Global Governance. J Bus Ethics 147, 721–734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3382-5
- United Nations Global Compact
- Global governance
- Institutional logics