Skip to main content
Log in

Are Women CEOs Valuable in Terms of Bank Loan Costs? Evidence from China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given that women CEOs are usually more risk averse, engage less in opportunistic behavior, and provide higher quality earnings than men CEOs, we argue that firms with women CEOs are likely to face lower operational and information risk and thus enjoy cheaper external funds. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firms operating from 2006 to 2012, we find consistent evidence that Chinese banks tend to impose lower loan costs on firms with women CEOs compared to firms with men CEOs. This effect is more pronounced (1) for non-state-owned enterprises than for state-owned enterprises, (2) for firms without political connections than for firms with political connections, and (3) during non-crisis periods. We do not find any significant effects for firms with women chairpersons, CFOs, or directors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These figures come from Catalyst, a leading non-profit organization dedicated to examining work environments to reveal gender inequities. For more details about Catalyst, see http://www.catalyst.org/.

  2. These figures come from MasterCard International’s Index of Women’s Advancement which measures women’s social and economic status according to the average labor market participation, education, management positions, and income levels. The benchmark score is 100. A score higher than 100 indicates a higher proportion of women to men; a score lower than 100 means a lower comparative proportion of women.

  3. This conclusion is cited from a speech by Georgette Tan, the general manager of public relations of MasterCard in the Asia–Pacific, Middle East, and Africa, in 2015. http://news.51credit.com/woaika/10746607.shtml.

  4. This figure comes from the China Entrepreneur Investment Club (CEIC) database.

  5. The “Big Four” wholly state-owned commercial banks are the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), Bank of China (BOC), and China Construction Bank (CCB). The three policy banks are the China Development Bank, the Export–Import Bank of China, and the Agricultural Development Bank of China (ADBC).

  6. These figures come from the China Banking Regulatory Commission.

  7. Note that this body of research does not always provide consistent findings (McCabe et al. 2006; Valentine and Rittenburg 2007). For example, Robin and Babin (1997) and Roxas and Stoneback (2004) do not find gender differences in ethical reasoning between men and women. However, because these studies usually use student sample, it is doubtful that their results are generalizable to professional populations (Loe et al. 2000).

  8. Petersen (2004) provides a highly recommended definition and description of the differences between hard and soft information.

  9. Although Sun et al. (2015) suggest that women executives and directors play a more positive role in times of economic crisis, the information is still soft and thus is less important to lenders during these periods.

  10. The independent variable (i.e., Women CEO) and three moderating variables (i.e., STATE, PC, and CRISIS) in Hypotheses 2-4 are indicator variables, so it is more reasonable to test Hypotheses 2-4 by conducting the regressions for the subsamples according to the moderating variables.

  11. Specifically, according to Altman and Hotchkiss (2006), the Z_score equals (1.2 × Working capital + 1.4 × Retained earnings + 3.3 × EBIT + 0.6 × Market value + 0.999 × Sales)/Total assets.

  12. Besides CEO gender, other CEO characteristics (e.g., age, education, and experience) may be valuable for making lending decisions. However, the data for these additional characteristics have huge missing values. Firm-year observations with such missing data are not randomly distributed and are significantly different from observations without missing data. Therefore, following Francis et al. (2013), we report the results of regression without controlling for these characteristics. Nevertheless, we still find qualitatively similar regression results after controlling for CEO age and CEO education with available data.

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., Zhang, C., & Zhao, M. (2012). China’s financial system: Opportunities and challenges. NBER Working Paper No. w17828.

  • Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2006). Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, A., Davidson, L. F., Rama, D. V., & Thiruvadi, S. (2010). CFO gender and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brei, M., & Schclarek, A. (2015). A theoretical model of bank lending: Does ownership matter in times of crisis? Journal of Banking & Finance, 50(1), 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chava, S., & Purnanandam, A. (2010). CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2), 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chen, J. Z., Lobo, G. J., & Wang, Y. (2010). Association between borrower and lender state ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 973–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. F., He, S., Ma, Z., & Stice, D. (2016a). The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016b). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2011). Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1158–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. M., & Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2011). The impact of financial reporting quality on debt contracting: Evidence from internal control weakness reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 97–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Leung, T., & Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Weng, J., Zeng, Q., Chang, Y., & Pei, H. (2015). Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese private-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2014). CEO gender and corporate risk-taking. Working Paper, Purdue University and Manchester Business School.

  • Faccio, M., Masulis, R., & McConnell, J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, A. I., González, F., & Suárez, N. (2013). The real effect of banking crises: Finance or asset allocation effects? Some international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2419–2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Lin, C., Liu, P., & Wong, S. M. L. (2009). Inside the black box: Bank credit allocation in China’s private sector. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(6), 1144–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. E., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2015). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making: Evidence from accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1285–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2013). The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 28(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., & Heffernan, S. (2009). The effects of reform on China’s bank structure and performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., & Zhang, J. L. (2011). Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1141–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., & Laeven, L. (2012). The flight home effect: Evidence from the syndicated loan market during financial crises. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godlewski, C. J. (2014). Bank loans and borrowers value during the global financial crisis: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 28, 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. S., Li, A. Y., Tam, K., & Zhang, F. (2015). CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hristov, N., Hülsewig, O., & Wollmershäuser, T. (2012). Loan supply shocks during the financial crisis: Evidence from the Euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3), 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hristov, N., Hülsewig, O., & Wollmershäuser, T. (2014). The interest rate pass-through in the Euro area during the global financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Critical mass of women on BODs, multiple identities, and corporate philanthropic disaster response: Evidence from privately owned Chinese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., & Kim, K. A. (2015). Corporate governance in China: A modern perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 190–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. X., Petroni, K. R., & Wang, I. Y. (2010). CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 513–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Pany, K., Samuels, J., & Zhang, J. (2009). An examination of the association between gender and reporting intentions for fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremp, E., & Sevestre, P. (2013). Did the crisis induce credit rationing for French SMEs? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(10), 3757–3772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., McGuinness, P. B., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender, executive compensation and firm performance in Chinese-listed enterprises. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 21(1), 1136–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. (2011). Foreign bank entry and firms’ access to bank credit: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(4), 1000–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. W. (2004). Corporate governance in China: Recent developments, key problems and solutions. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Lu, Z. J. (2007). Corporate governance and earnings management in the Chinese listed companies: A tunneling perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 881–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, W., & Yin, X. (2014). The impact of the global financial crisis on mortgage pricing and credit supply. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 29, 336–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, D. C. M., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea. Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35(Pt. A), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2012). Bank discrimination, holding bank ownership, and economic consequences: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-On, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, P. B. (2016). IPO firm performance and its link with board officer gender, family-ties and other demographics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3295-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. (2004). Information: Hard and soft. NBER Working Paper.

  • Peterson, R. (2009). Estimating standard error in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: A critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate finance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (2002). Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized vs. hierarchical firms. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1891–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Wright, M. (2012). The contingent value of corporate political ties. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S. L., Zhu, J., & Ye, K. (2015). Board openness during an economic crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, G., & Yang, L. (2015). Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S. R., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executives in international business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Liu, M. (2011). The impact of managerial political connections and quality on government subsidies: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Chinese Management Studies, 5(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, K., & Zhang, R. (2011). Do lenders value corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, K., Zhang, R., & Rezaee, Z. (2010). Does top executive gender diversity affect earnings quality? A large sample analysis of Chinese listed firms. Advances in Accounting Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 26(1), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the Chinese National Science Funds (Grant No. 71202061, 71572160, and 71672197), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Fujian Province (2015), and Program for Cultivating Outstanding Young Research Talents in University of Fujian Province (2015). All remaining errors are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-hui Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Jh., Huang, Z., Li, X. et al. Are Women CEOs Valuable in Terms of Bank Loan Costs? Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 153, 337–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3369-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3369-2

Keywords

Navigation