Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience research portend well for furthering understanding of many of the fundamental questions in the field of business ethics, both normative and empirical. This article provides an overview of neuroscience methodology and brain structures, and explores the areas in which neuroscience research has contributed findings of value to business ethics, as well as suggesting areas for future research. Neuroscience research is especially capable of providing insight into individual reactions to ethical issues, while also raising challenging normative questions about the nature of moral responsibility, autonomy, intent, and free will. This article also provides a brief summary of the papers included in this special issue, attesting to the richness of scholarly inquiry linking neuroscience and business ethics. We conclude that neuroscience offers considerable promise to the field of business ethics, but we caution against overpromise.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abe, N., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens predicts behavior in an independent test of honesty. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(2), 10564–10572.
Abe, N., Suzuki, M., Mori, E., Itoh, M., & Fujii, T. (2007). Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 287–295.
Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Review Neuroscience, 4(3), 165–178.
Amodio, D. (2010). Can neuroscience advance social psychological theory? Social neuroscience for the behavioral social psychologist. Social Cognition, 28(6), 695–716.
Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., & Rietdijk, W. J. R. (2013). Theory of mind and empathic explanations of machiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective. Journal of Management, 39, 1760–1798.
Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J., Huth, M., & Ghumman, S. (2011). Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 169–180.
Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933–961.
Becker, W. J., & Menges, J. I. (2013). Biological implicit measures in HRM and OB: A question of how not if. Human Resource Management Review, 23(3), 219–228.
Bendahan, S., Zehnder, C., Pralong, F. P., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Leader corruption depends on power and testosterone. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 101–122.
Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 1–23.
Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.
Bluhm, R. (2013). New research, old problems: Methodological and ethical issues in fMRI research examining sex/gender differences in emotion processing. Neuroethics, 6(2), 319–330.
Boksem, M. A. S., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 118–128.
Bowers, J. S. (2016). The practice and principled problems with educational neuroscience, Psychological Review. Online publication.
Bowie, N. E. (2009). How empirical research in human cognition does and does not affect philosophical ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 635–643.
Burns, J. D., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decision making and free will: A neuroscience perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(2), 263–280.
Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A. R., Langner, R., et al. (2012). Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Structure & Function, 217, 783–796.
Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64.
Carney, D. R., & Mason, M. F. (2010). Decision making and testosterone: When the ends justify the means. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 668–671.
Christopoulos, G. I., Liu, X. X., & Hong, Y. Y. (2016). Toward an understanding of dynamic moral decision making: Model-free and model-based learning. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3058-1.
Cropanzano, R. S., Massaro, S., & Becker, W. J. (2016). Deontic justice and organizational neuroscience. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3056-3.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam.
Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics. 16(11), 1143–1152.
De Ridder, D., Kroese, F., Adriaanse, M., & Evers, C. (2014). Always gamble on an empty stomach: Hunger is associated with advantageous decision making. PLoS One, 9(10), 1–8.
Decety, J. (2016). How evolutionary theory and neuroscience contribute to understanding the development of prosociality: Commentary. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development (in press).
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., & Kinzler, K. D. (2011). The developmental neuroscience of moral sensitivity. Emotion Review, 3(3), 305–307.
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., & Kinzler, K. D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: A neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 209–220.
Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2015). A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children and adults. Psychological Bulletin, 14(1), 48–84.
DeGeorge, R. T. (1987). The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(3), 201–211.
Dimoka, A. (2012). How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (FMRI) study in social science research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 811–840.
Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 157–169.
Fairhurst, M. T., Janata, P., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An FMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. Neuroimage, 84, 688–697.
Farah, M. J., Hutchinson, B., Phelps, E. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2014). Functional MRI-based lie detection: Scientific and societal challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(2), 123–131.
Fehr, E. (2008). The effects of neuropeptides on human trust and altruism: A neuroeconomic perspective. In D. W. Pfaff, C. Kordon, P. Chanson, & Y. Christen (Eds.), Hormones and social behaviour (pp. 47–56). Berlin: Springer.
Fine, C. (2012). Explaining, or sustaining, the status quo? The potentially self-fulfilling effects of ‘hardwired’ accounts of sex differences. Neuroethics, 5(3), 285–294.
Fischer, J. M. (1999). Recent work on moral responsibility. Ethics, 110(1), 93–139.
French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 207–215.
Frith, C. D., & Singer, T. (2008). The role of social cognition in decision making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3875–3886.
Frydman, C., Barberis, N., Camerer, C., & Rangel, A. (2014). Using neural data to test a theory of investor behavior: An application to realization utility. Journal of Finance, 69(2), 907–946.
Fumagalli, M., & Priori, A. (2012). Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. Brain, 135(7), 2006–2021.
Gallese, V. (2001). The ‘shared manifold’ hypothesis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33–50.
Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. A. (2009). Neuroeconomics decision making and the brain. London: Elsevier.
Gottfried, J. A. (2011). Neurobiology of sensation and reward. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 491–505.
Greene, J. D. (2014). Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (neuro)science matters for ethics. Ethics, 124(4), 695–726.
Greene, J. D. (2015). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision making. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 197–220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Greene, J. D., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775–1785.
Greene, J. D., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
Gunia, B. C., Barnes, C. M., & Sah, S. (2014). The morality of larks and owls: Unethical behavior depends on chronotype as well as time of day. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2272–2274.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W. (2013). The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 393–411.
Heinzelmann, N., Ugazia, G., & Tobler, P. N. (2012). Practical implications of empirically studying moral decision-making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 94(6), 69–82.
Hopkins, P. D., & Fiser, H. L. (2016). This position requires some alteration of your brain: On the moral and legal issues of using neurotechnology to modify employees. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3182-y.
Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2014). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Jap, S., Robertson, D. C., Rindfleisch, A., & Hamilton, R. (2013). Low-stakes opportunism. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 216–227.
Jeurissen, D., Sack, A. T., Roebroeck, A., Russ, B. E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014). TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 18.
Johnson, S. C., Baxter, L. C., Wilder, L. S., Pipe, J. G., Heiserman, J. E., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 125, 1808–1814.
Johnson, R. R., Berka, C., Waldman, D. A., Balthazar, P., Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2013). Neurophysiological predictors of team performance. In D. D. Schmorrow & C. M. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition (Vol. 8027, pp. 153–161). Berlin: Springer.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
Jordan-Young, R., & Rumiati, R. I. (2012). Hardwired for sexism? Approaches to sex/gender in neuroscience. Neuroethics, 5(3), 305–315.
Kable, J. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: A functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(2), 63–84.
Karmarkar, U. R., Shiv, B., & Knutson, B. (2015). Cost conscious? The neural and behavioral impact of price primacy on decision-making. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 467–481.
Keltner, D., Kogan, A., Piff, P. K., & Saturn, S. R. (2014). The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: Core processes from gene to meme. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 425–460.
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78–83.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M. P., Zak, J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(2), 673–676.
Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25(1), 95–102.
Lee, E., Kwon, G., Shin, H. J., Yang, S., Lee, S., & Suh, M. (2014). The spell of green: Can frontal EEG activations identify green consumers? Journal of Business Ethics, 122(3), 511–521.
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 109–137.
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 259–289.
Lim, J., & Dinges, D. F. (2010). A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 375–389.
Lindebaum, D. (2013). Pathologizing the healthy but ineffective: Some ethical reflections on using neuroscience in leadership research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 295–305.
Lindebaum, D. (2016). Critical essay: Building new management theories on sound data? The case of neuroscience. Human Relations, 69(3), 537–550.
Lindebaum, D. & Raftopoulou, E. (2014). What would John Stuart Mill say? A utilitarian perspective on contemporary neuroscience debates in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2247-z.
Lindebaum, D., & Zundel, M. (2013). Not quite a revolution: Scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies. Human Relations, 66(6), 857–877.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.
Maak, T., Pless, N. M., & Voegtlin, C. (2016). Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 463–493.
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.
McCuen, R. H., & Shaw, G. (2007). Implications to ethics education of recent neuroscience research on emotions. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(3), 44–56.
Miska, C., & Mendenhall, M. (2015). Responsible leadership: A mapping of extant research and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics.. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2999-0..
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourao-Miranda, J., et al. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736.
Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., de Olivieira-Souza, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(42), 15623–15628.
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 799–809.
Morse, S. J. (2004). New neuroscience, old problems. In B. Garland (Ed.), Neuroscience and the law: Brain, mind, and the scales of justice (pp. 157–198). New York: Dana Press.
Ochsner, K. N., & Lieberman, M. D. (2001). The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 56(9), 717.
Orlitzky, M. (2016). How cognitive neuroscience informs a subjectivist-evolutionary explanation of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3132-8.
Parens, E. (2014). Living with the ancient puzzle. Interpreting Neuroimages: An Introduction to the Technology and Its Limit. Hastings Center Report, 44(S2), 50–52.
Parens, E., & Johnston, J. (2014). Neuroimaging: Beginning to appreciate its complexities. Interpreting Neuroimages: An Introduction to the Technology and Its Limit. Hastings Center Report, 44(S2), 2–7.
Pärnamets, P., Johansson, P., Hall, L., Balkenius, C., Spivey, M. J., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(13), 4170–4175.
Pascal-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabel, L. B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377–401.
Patterson, R., Rothstein, J., & Barbey, A. K. (2012). Reasoning, cognitive control, and moral intuition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 1–8.
Pincus, M., LaViers, L., Prietula, M. J., & Berns, G. (2014). The conforming brain and deontological resolve. PLoS One, 9(8), e106061.
Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service-learning programs: The Ulysses experience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 237–260.
Plitt, M., Savjani, R. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2014). Are corporations people too? The neural correlates of moral judgments about companies and individuals. Social Neuroscience, 10(2), 1–13.
Prehn, K., Korczykowski, M., Rao, H., Fang, Z., Detre, J. A., & Robertson, D. C. (2015). Neural correlates of post-conventional moral reasoning: A voxel-based morphometry study. PLoS One, 10(6), 1–12.
Rachul, C., & Zarzeczny, A. (2012). The rise of neuroskepticism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(2), 77–81.
Raine, A. (2013). The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. New York: Pantheon Press.
Rest, J. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.
Reynolds, S. J., & Miller, J. A. (2015). The recognition of moral issues: Moral awareness, moral sensitivity and moral attentiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 114–117.
Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology, and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5, 63–91.
Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004a). Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative reward pathways. NeuroReport, 15(16), 2539–2543.
Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004b). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage, 22(4), 1694–1703.
Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., DuBois Bowman, F., Gilkey, R., et al. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 755–766.
Rochford, K. C., Jack, A. I., Boyatzis, R. E., & French, S. E. (2016). Ethical leadership as a balance between opposing neural networks. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3264-x.
Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millenium: commentary. Neuron, 35(1), 21–23.
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(12), 2008–2039.
Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., et al. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50.
Ryan, L. V. (2016). Sex differences through a neuroscience lens: Implications for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3110-1.
Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1–31.
Sanfey, A. G. (2007). Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318(5850), 598–602.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Stanton, S. J. (2009). Assessment of salivary hormones. In E. Harmon Jones & J. S. Beer (Eds.), Methods in social neuroscience (pp. 17–44). New York: The Guilford Press.
Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., & Stanton, S. J. (2004). Effects of affiliation and power motivation arousal on salivary progesterone and testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 46(5), 592–599.
Sepinwall, A. J. (2015). Corporate moral responsibility. Philosophy Compass, 11(1), 3–13.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.
Skulmowski, A., Bunge, A., Kaspar, K., & Pipa, G. (2014). Forced-choice decision-making in modified trolley dilemma situations: A virtual reality and eye tracking study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 426.
Sommer, M., Meinhardt, J., Rothmayr, C., Dohnel, K., Hajak, G., Ruppercht, R., et al. (2014). Me or you? Neural correlates of moral reasoning in everyday conflict situations in adolescents and adults. Social Neuroscience, 9(5), 452–470.
Stanton, S. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Huettel, S. A. (2016). Neuromarketing: Ethical implications of its use and potential misuse. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0.
Starcke, K., & Brand, M. (2012). Decision making under stress: A selective review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2012), 1228–1248.
Starcke, K., Polzer, C., Wolf, Oliver T., & Brand, M. (2011). Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26(2011), 210–219.
Tenbrunsel, A., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). A sniff of trust: Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on face recognition, trust to in-group, and trust to out-group. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(3), 438–443.
Van’t Veer, A. E., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. (2014). Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(3), 199–206.
Velasquez, M. (1983). Why corporations are not morally responsible for anything they do. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 2(3), 1–18.
Voegtlin, C., & Kaufmann, I. M. (2012). Neuroscience and ethical leadership research: Fact or fancy? IOU working paper. University of Zurich.
Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., et al. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage, 14, 170–181.
Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., Lim, V. K. G., & Lim, G. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1068–1076.
Waldman, D. A., Balthazard, P. A., & Peterson, S. J. (2011). Leadership and neuroscience: Can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed? Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 60–74.
Weisberg, D. S. (2008). Caveat lector: The presentation of neuroscience information in the popular media. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practices, 6(1), 51–56.
Yoder, K., & Decety, J. (2014). The good, the bad, and the just: Justice sensitivity predicts neural response during moral evaluation of actions performed by others. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(12), 4161–4166.
Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(15), 6753–6758.
Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Sax, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(20), 8235–8240.
Young, L., & Koenigs, M. (2007). Investigating emotion in moral cognition: A review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology. British Medical Bulletin, 84(1), 69–79. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldm031
Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., et al. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(2012), 491–498.
Zeki, S., & Goodenough, O. R. (2004). Law and the brain: Introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 359(1451), 1661–1665.
The authors thank Laura Noval and William T. Ross, Jr., for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. C. Voegtlin acknowledges the financial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation for the research projects on Responsible Leadership and Social Innovation (Grant Numbers 100018_149937 and 100010_165699).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and are not funded by a third-party.
Research Involving Human and Animal Rights
The article was not funded by any third-party organization. The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.
About this article
Cite this article
Robertson, D.C., Voegtlin, C. & Maak, T. Business Ethics: The Promise of Neuroscience. J Bus Ethics 144, 679–697 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3312-6
- Neuroscience methods
- Brain structures
- Normative business ethics
- Empirical business ethics
- Ethical decision making