Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 152, Issue 3, pp 703–724 | Cite as

Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective

  • Maria JärlströmEmail author
  • Essi Saru
  • Sinikka Vanhala
Article

Abstract

The present paper analyses how top managers construct the meaning of sustainable human resource management (HRM) and its responsibility areas and how they identify and prioritize stakeholders in sustainable HRM. The empirical data were collected as part of the Finnish HR Barometer inquiry. A qualitative analysis reveals four dimensions of sustainable HRM: Justice and equality, transparent HR practices, profitability, and employee well-being. It also reveals four broader responsibility areas: Legal and ethical, managerial, social, and economic. Contrary to the prior green HRM literature, ecological responsibility was largely ignored. The study also reveals a wide range of stakeholders, specifically, owners, managers, employees, customers, and employee representatives, as well as their special roles and requirements for sustainable HRM. These findings contribute to the literature of sustainable HRM by illustrating the dimensions and broader responsibilities of sustainable HRM as seen by top managers. Their conceptions of sustainable HRM are largely neglected in the prior literature despite their crucial role in legitimating HRM and thus sustainable HRM in companies. These results also contribute to the theory of stakeholder salience (identification and prioritization of stakeholders) in the sustainable HRM context from the viewpoint of top managers.

Keywords

Green HRM HRM Sustainable HRM Stakeholders Qualitative approach 

References

  1. Accountability. (2007). The state of responsible competitiveness 2007. Making sustainable development count in global markets. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from http://www.accountability.org/images/content/0/7/075/The%20State%20of%20Responsible%20Competitiveness.pdf.
  2. Andersen, T. M. (2008). The Scandinavian model—Prospects and challenges. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 45–66.Google Scholar
  3. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high performance work systems pay off. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, C., Flood, P., Guthrie, J., Liu, W., Maccurtain, S., & Mkamwa, T. (2010). The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 977–998.Google Scholar
  5. Azmi, F. T., & Mushtaq, S. (2013). Assessing the role of internal and external agents in HRM: Scale development and validation. South Asian Journal of Management, 20(3), 74–103.Google Scholar
  6. Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427–438.Google Scholar
  7. Beer, M., Spector, R., Lawrence, P., Quinn Mills, D., & Walton, R. (1984). Human resource management: A general manager’s perspective. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
  10. Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Processing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 3–23.Google Scholar
  11. Brewster, C., & Mayrhofer, W. (2012). Handbook of research on comparative HRM. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Browning, V., & Delahaye, B. (2011). Enhancing workplace learning through collaborative HRD. In M. Clarke (Ed.), Readings in HRM and sustainability (pp. 36–50). Melbourne: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Byrkjeflot, H. (2001). The Nordic model of democracy and management. In H. Byrkjeflot, S. Myklebust, C. Myrvang, & F. Sejersted (Eds.), The democratic challenge to capitalism: Management and democracy in the Nordic countries (pp. 19–21). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.Google Scholar
  15. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20, 372–393.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, M. (2011). Sustainable HRM: A new approach to people management. In M. Clarke (Ed.), Readings in HRM and sustainability (pp. 1–7). Melbourne: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cleveland, J. N., Byrne, S., & Cavanagh, T. M. (2015). The future of HR is RH: Respect for humanity at work. Human Resource Management Review, 25, 146–161.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, E. (2010). CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business practices. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, E., Taylor, S., & Muller-Camen, M. (2012). HRM’s role in corporate social and environmental sustainability. SHRM Report. Retrieved April 24, 2015, from http://www.wfpma.com/sites/wfpma.com/files/CSR%20Report%20FINAL%202012.pdf.
  20. Cooke, F., & He, Q. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and HRM in China: A study of textile and apparel enterprises. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16, 355–376.Google Scholar
  21. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics, a European perspective: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cranet. (2011). International executive report: Cranet survey on comparative HRM. Cranfield: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  23. de Gama, N., McKenna, S., & Peticca-Harris, A. (2012). Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and conceptual analysis experiences of HR professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 97–108.Google Scholar
  24. De Prins, P., Van Beirenbrock, L., De Vos, A., & Segers, J. (2014). Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ‘Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)’ model. Management Revue, 25(4), 263–284.Google Scholar
  25. Docherty, P., Forselin, J., Shani, A., & Kira, M. (2002). Emerging work systems: From intensive to sustainable. In P. Docherty, J. Forselin, & A. B. Shani (Eds.), Creating work systems. Emerging perspectives and practice (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A. (2009). Creating sustainable work systems: Developing social sustainability. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Donnelly, N., & Proctor-Thompson, S. (2011). Workplace sustainability and employee voice. In M. Clarke (Ed.), Readings in HRM and sustainability (pp. 117–132). Melbourne: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Egri, C. P., & Hornal, R. C. (2002). Strategic environmental human resource management and perceived organizational performance: An exploratory study of the Canadian manufacturing sector. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 205–236). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Ehnert, I. (2009a). Sustainable human resource management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Ehnert, I. (2009b). Sustainability and human resource management: Reasoning and applications on corporate websites. European Journal of International Management, 3(4), 419–438.Google Scholar
  31. Ehnert, I. (2014). Paradox as a lens for theorizing sustainable HRM. In I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. J. Zink (Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management developing sustainable business organizations (pp. 247–272). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Ehnert, I., & Harry, W. (2012). Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Management Revue, 23(3), 221–238.Google Scholar
  33. Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2014). Sustainability and HRM. In I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. J. Zink (Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management developing sustainable business organizations (pp. 3–32). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 88–108.Google Scholar
  35. Elkington, J. (1988). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Gabriola Island/Stony Creek: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Ferrary, M. (2009). A stakeholder’s perspective on human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 31–43.Google Scholar
  37. Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. (1996). Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 715–730.Google Scholar
  38. Fombrun, C., Tichy, N., & Devanna, M. (Eds.). (1984). Strategic human resource management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Francis, H. (2002). The power of “talk” in HRM-based change. Personnel Review, 31(4), 432–448.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  41. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.Google Scholar
  42. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
  43. Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in Academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370–403.Google Scholar
  44. Gond, J.-P., Igalens, J., Swaen, V., & El Akremi, A. (2011). The human resource contribution to responsible leadership: An exploration of the CSR–HR interface. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 115–132.Google Scholar
  45. Grace, D. (1995). Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 78–101.Google Scholar
  47. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate, social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Greenwood, M. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–279.Google Scholar
  49. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.Google Scholar
  50. Greenwood, M. (2013). Ethical analyses of HRM: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 355–366.Google Scholar
  51. Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2011). Ethics and HRM: The contribution of stakeholder theory. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 30(3–4), 269–292.Google Scholar
  52. Greenwood, M., & Van Buren III, H. J. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organization–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 425–438.Google Scholar
  53. Guerci, M., & Pedrini, M. (2014). The consensus between Italian HR and sustainability managers on HR management for sustainability-driven change—Towards a ‘strong’ HR management system. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(13), 1787–1814.Google Scholar
  54. Guerci, M., & Shani, A. (2013). Moving toward stakeholder-based HRM: A perspective of Italian HR managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(6), 1130–1150.Google Scholar
  55. Guerci, M., & Shani, A. (2014). Stakeholder involvement in human resource management practices: Evidence from Italy. Management Revue, 25(2), 80–102.Google Scholar
  56. Guerci, M., Shani, A. B., & Solari, L. (2014). A stakeholder perspective for sustainable HRM. In I. Ehnert, W. Harry, & K. J. Zink (Eds.), Sustainability and human resource management developing sustainable business organizations (pp. 205–224). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Guest, D. (2011). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 263–276.Google Scholar
  58. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.Google Scholar
  59. Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316.Google Scholar
  60. Hartog, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable HRM. In M. Muller-Camen, R. Croucher, & L. Susan (Eds.), Human resource management: A case study approach (pp. 467–488). London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  61. Hörisch, J., Freeman, E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.Google Scholar
  62. Jabbour, C., & Santos, F. (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2133–2154.Google Scholar
  63. Jackson, S. E., Renwick, D., Jabbour, C., & Muller-Camen, M. (2011). State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: Introduction into the special issue. Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung, 25(2), 99–116.Google Scholar
  64. Jackson, S., & Schuler, R. (2003). Managing human resources through strategic partnerships (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Thompson/South-Western.Google Scholar
  65. Jackson, S. E., & Seo, J. (2010). The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organization Management Journal, 7, 278–290.Google Scholar
  66. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231.Google Scholar
  67. Jamali, D., El Dirani, A., & Harwood, I. A. (2015). Exploring human resource management roles in corporate social responsibility: The CSR–HRM co-creation model. Business Ethics: A European Review, 2(2), 125–143.Google Scholar
  68. Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089.Google Scholar
  69. Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C. E. (2015). Empowering employee sustainability: Perceived organizational support toward the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 207–220.Google Scholar
  70. Legge, K. (2005). Human resource management: Rhetoric and reality. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Lindeberg, T., Månsson, B., & Vanhala, S. (2004). Sweden and Finland: Small countries with large companies. In C. Brewster, W. Mayrhofer, & M. Morley (Eds.), Human resource management in Europe: Evidence of convergence? (pp. 279–312). Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  72. Lindström, S., & Vanhala, S. (2013). Performance in local government HRM: The role of external customers. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(3), 252–368.Google Scholar
  73. Marchington, M. (2015). Human resource management (HRM): Too busy looking up to see where it is going longer term? Human Resource Management Review, 25, 176–187.Google Scholar
  74. Mariappanadar, S. (2003). Sustainable human resource strategy. The sustainable and unsustainable dilemmas of retrenchment. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(8), 906–932.Google Scholar
  75. Mariappanadar, S. (2012). The harm indicators of negative externality of efficiency focused organizational practices. International Journal of Social Economics, 39, 209–220.Google Scholar
  76. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.Google Scholar
  78. Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology, 66, 805–824.Google Scholar
  79. National Environmental Education Foundation. (2009). The engaged organization: Corporate employee environmental education survey and case study findings. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  80. Nishii, L., & Wright, P. (2008). Variability within organizations: Implications for strategic human resource management. In D. B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations (pp. 225–248). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  81. OECD. (2014). Economic Survey of Finland 2014. Retrieved April 12, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-finland.htm.
  82. Osland, A., & Osland, J. S. (2007). Aracruz Celulose: Best practices icon but still at risk. International Journal of Manpower, 28(5), 435–450.Google Scholar
  83. Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  84. Peccei, R., Van De Voorde, K., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2013). HRM, well-being and performance: A theoretical and empirical review. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance. Achievements and challenges (pp. 15–46). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organizations. California Management Review, 40(2), 96–124.Google Scholar
  86. Phillips, R. (1999). On stakeholder delimitation. Business and Society, 38, 32–34.Google Scholar
  87. Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.Google Scholar
  88. Renwick, D., Jabbour, C., Muller-Camen, M., Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Contemporary developments in green (environmental) HRM scholarship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 114–128. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Renwick, D., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2008). Green HRM: A review, process model, and research agenda. University of Sheffield Discussion Paper No. 2008:01. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.120337!/file/Green-HRM.pdf.
  90. Renwick, D., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 1–14.Google Scholar
  91. Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 957–970.Google Scholar
  92. Rojo, L., & van Dijk, T. (1997). “There was a problem, and it was solved”: Legitimating the expulsion of “illegal” migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 8, 523–566.Google Scholar
  93. Ryner, M. (2007). The Nordic model: Does it exist? Can it survive? New Political Economy, 12(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
  94. Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (2014). Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: Yesterday and today. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(1), 35–55.Google Scholar
  95. Shore, L., & Barksdale, K. (1988). Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 731–744.Google Scholar
  96. Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organizational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 537–548.Google Scholar
  97. Sol-Ability. (2013). Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from http://www.solability.com/pdfs/Sustainable_Competitiveness_Index_2013.pdf.
  98. Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerst, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia. An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 1–15.Google Scholar
  99. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  100. Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  101. Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  102. Van Buren III, H. J. (2005). An employee-centered model of corporate social performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 687–709.Google Scholar
  103. Van Buren III, H. J., & Greenwood, M. (2011). Bringing stakeholder theory into industrial relations. Employee Relations, 33, 5–21.Google Scholar
  104. Van Buren III, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Sheehan, C. (2011). Strategic human resource management and the decline of employee focus. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 209–219.Google Scholar
  105. Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well-being and the HRM-performance relationship. A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 391–407.Google Scholar
  106. Vanhala, S., von Bonsdorff, M. E., & Tilev, K. (2012). Comparative HRM. Challenges of survey research. In S. Vanhala, K. Tilev, & S. Lindström (Eds.), Ristivetoa vai yhtä köyttä? Henkilöstöjohtaminen, työhyvinvointi ja tuloksellisuus (pp. 117–131). Business & Economy 5/2013. Helsinki: Aalto University School of Business.Google Scholar
  107. Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 1–16.Google Scholar
  108. Waldman, D., & Siegel, D. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 117–131.Google Scholar
  109. Wells, S. (2011). HRM for sustainability: Creating a new paradigm. In M. Clarke (Ed.), Readings in HRM and sustainability (pp. 133–146). Melbourne: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Wright, P., & McMahan, G. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320.Google Scholar
  111. Zaugg, R., Blum, A., & Thom, N. (2001). Sustainability in human resource management: Evaluation report. Survey in European companies and institutions. Bern: IOP-Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VaasaVAASAFinland
  2. 2.Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTURUN YLIOPISTOFinland
  3. 3.Aalto University School of BusinessAALTOFinland

Personalised recommendations