Managing Organizational Gender Diversity Images: A Content Analysis of German Corporate Websites

  • Leon Windscheid
  • Lynn Bowes-Sperry
  • Karsten Jonsen
  • Michèle Morner
Article

Abstract

Although establishing gender equality in board and managerial positions has recently become more important for organizations, companies with low levels of gender diversity seem to perceive an ethical dilemma regarding the ways, in which they attempt to attain it. One way that organizations try to move toward gender equality is through the use of their corporate websites to manage potential applicants’ impressions of their current levels of, and actions to improve, gender diversity. The dilemma is whether to truthfully communicate their low level of gender diversity, conceal it, or exaggerate it. On the one hand, organizations that are truthful may find it difficult to achieve equality because women are less attracted to companies that lack diversity. On the other hand, organizations that are untruthful risk their moral legitimacy. The present work investigates gender diversity-related communication on the corporate websites of 99 major German companies. Based on theoretical work on minority attraction, we apply an organizational impression management taxonomy to guide our in-depth content analysis. With this approach, we hope to advance the understanding of how the issue of gender diversity is presented on corporate websites, which is useful for both organizational decision makers as well as diversity researchers. We found that although gender diversity-related communications on corporate websites contain both assertive and defensive organizational impression management tactics, as well as a third type of tactic we refer to as “acknowledgement,” assertive tactics were used more frequently. We argue the existence of a paradox whereby organizations use assertive impression management tactics to maintain pragmatic legitimacy but compromise their moral legitimacy by doing so. Furthermore, we argue that moral legitimacy can be maintained or restored through the sincere use of defensive impression management tactics and acknowledgement.

Keywords

Gender diversity Impression management Corporate websites Employer image Gender equality Corporate legitimacy 

References

  1. Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a website on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1696–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (2009). Understanding gender and organizations. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2000). Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals’ use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 494–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auret, D., & Barrientos, S. (2006). Participatory social auditing: Developing a worker-focused approach. In S. Barrientos & C. Dolan (Eds.), Ethical sourcing in the global food system (pp. 129–148). New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  7. Avery, D. R., Hernandez, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2004). Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avery, D. R., & Johnson, C. D. (2008). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mixed messages regarding workforce diversity. In K. M. Thomas (Ed.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 221–247). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Avery, D. R., & McKay, P. F. (2006). Target practice: An organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 59, 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Volpone, S. D. (2013). Diversity staffing: Inclusive personnel recruitment and selection practices. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 282–299). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Barbosa, I., & Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2010). Equality and diversity rhetoric: One size fits all? Globalization and the Portuguese context. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Please accept my sincerest apologies: Examining follower reactions to leader apology. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bellard, E., & Rüling, C. C. (2001). Reflections and projections of boundaries in the diversity management discourses in the United-States, France and Germany. In 17th EGOS colloquium, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  14. Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Vassill, K. M. (2006). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with fortune’s “100 best companies to work for” list? Business and Society, 45, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 1080–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bravo, R., Matute, J., & Pina, J. M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: A study focused on the websites of Spanish financial entities. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(2), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., & Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: A field investigation with recent college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cappelli, P. (2001). Making the most of the online recruiting. Harvard Business Review, 79, 139–146.Google Scholar
  22. Carley, K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Casper, W. J., Wayne, J. H., & Manegold, J. G. (2013). Who will we recruit? Targeting deep- and surface-level diversity with human resource policy advertising. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-connecting-corporate-performance-and-gender-diversity.
  25. Catalyst. (2011). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (20042008). Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-corporate-performance-and-womens-representation-boards-20042008.
  26. Catalyst. (2013). Women in management, global comparison. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-management-global-comparison.
  27. Chapple, L., & Humphrey, J. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2004). Recruitment on the net: How do organizational web site characteristics influence applicant attraction? Journal of Management, 30, 623–646.Google Scholar
  29. Connolly-Ahern, C., & Broadway, S. C. (2007). The importance of appearing competent: An analysis of corporate impression management strategies on the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 343–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Djonov, E. (2007). Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective. Information Design Journal, 15(2), 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elsbach, K. D., Sutton, R. I., & Principe, K. E. (1998). Averting expected challenges through anticipatory impression management: A study of hospital billing. Organization Science, 9(1), 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fukukawa, K., Balmer, J. M., & Gray, E. R. (2007). Mapping the interface between corporate identity, ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gao, Y. (2009). Corporate social performance in China: Evidence from large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gardner, W. L. (1992). Lessons in organizational dramaturgy: The art of impression management. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1988). Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 14, 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garrett, D. E., Bradford, J. L., Meyers, R. A., & Becker, J. (1989). Issues management and organizational accounts: An analysis of corporate responses to accusations of unethical business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(7), 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. German Ministry of Family Affairs (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend & Bundesministerium). (2014). Response of the Government to the UNECE questionnaire on the implementation of the Beijing declaration (1995) and the outcome of the 23rd special session of the general assembly (2000). Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung4/Pdf-Anlagen/ueberpruefung-der-umsetzung-vonpekingenglisch,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf.
  39. German Ministry of Family Affairs and the Ministry of Justice (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend und Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz). (2015). Fragen und Antworten zu dem Gesetz für die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe von Frauen und Männern an Führungspositionen in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst. Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung4/Pdf-Anlagen/FAQ-gesetz-frauenquote,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf.
  40. Gilbert, J. A., & Stead, B. A. (1999). Stigmatization revisited: Does diversity management make a difference in applicant success? Group and Organization Management, 24, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Habermas, J. (1994). Remarks on discourse ethics. In J. Habermas (Ed.), Justification and applications (pp. 19–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1013–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Lucas, J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 44, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management, 35, 1481–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jansson, E. (2005). The stakeholder model: The influence of the ownership and governance structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Jonsen, K., Galunic, C., Weeks, J., & Braga, T. (2015). Evaluating espoused values: Does articulating values pay off? European Management Journal, 33(5), 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jonsen, K., Tatli, A., Özbilgin, M. F., & Bell, M. P. (2013). The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity. Human Relations, 66, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 960–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kirby, E. L., & Harter, L. M. (2003). Speaking the language of the bottom-line: The metaphor of “managing diversity”. Journal of Business Communication, 40(1), 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995). Race and sex differences in line managers’ reactions to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action interventions. Group and Organization Management, 20, 409–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larkin, M. B., Bernardi, R. A., & Bosco, S. M. (2012). Board gender diversity, corporate reputation and market performance. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  57. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leslie, L. M., Mayer, D. M., & Kravitz, D. A. (2014). The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 964–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohamed, A., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). An exploratory study of interorganizational defamation: An organizational impression management perspective. Organizational Analysis, 12(2), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mohamed, A., Gardner, W. L., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (1999). A taxonomy of organizational impression management tactics. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 7, 108–130.Google Scholar
  62. Ng, E. S., & Burke, R. J. (2005). Person-organization fit and the war for talent: Does diversity management make a difference? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1195–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ogden, S., & Clarke, J. (2005). Customer disclosures, impression management and the construction of legitimacy: Corporate reports in the UK privatised water industry. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18, 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Palmer, I., Kabanoff, B., & Dunford, R. (1997). Managerial accounts of downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background paper for the World Development Report.Google Scholar
  67. Perrault, E. (2015). Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Point, S., & Singh, V. (2003). Defining and dimensionalising diversity: Evidence from corporate websites across Europe. European Management Journal, 21, 750–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richard, O. C., Murthi, B. P., & Ismail, K. (2007). The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long-term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2007). From want ads to web sites—What diversity messages are state governments projecting? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations (pp. 21–43). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  74. Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schuh, S. C., Bark, A. S. H., Van Quaquebeke, N., Hossiep, R., Frieg, P., & Van Dick, R. (2014). Gender differences in leadership role occupancy: The mediating role of power motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh, V., & Point, S. (2006). (Re)presentations of gender and ethnicity in diversity statements on European company websites. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(4), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/-getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
  78. Suchmann, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  79. Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). CSR communication: An impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tedeschi, J. T., & Lindskold, S. (1976). Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  81. Tedeschi, J. T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior (pp. 271–309). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  82. Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tucker, S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Reid, E. M., & Elving, C. (2006). Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., & Turner, C. (2014). The female FTSE board report 2014: Crossing the finish line. Cranfield: Cranfield School of Management. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/the-female-ftse-board-report-2014.
  85. Vuontisjärvi, T. (2006). Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(4), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walker, H. J., Feild, H. S., Bernerth, J. B., & Becton, J. B. (2012). Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers’ information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Williams, C. L., Kilanski, K., & Muller, C. (2014). Corporate diversity programs and gender inequality in the oil and gas industry. Work and Occupations, 41, 440–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Williamson, I. O., Slay, H. S., Shapiro, D. L., & Shivers-Blackwell, S. L. (2008). The effect of explanations on prospective applicants’ reactions to firm diversity practices. Human Resource Management, 47, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Mazei, J., & Morner, M. (2015). The paradox of diversity initiatives: When organizational needs differ from employee preferences. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2864-1.Google Scholar
  91. Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Kidder, D. L., Cheung, H. K., Morner, M., & Lievens, F. (2016). Actions speak louder than words: Outsiders’ perceptions of diversity mixed messages. Journal of Applied Psychology. (in press).Google Scholar
  92. Winter, S. J., Saunders, C., & Hart, P. (2003). Electronic window dressing: Impression management with websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Windscheid
    • 1
  • Lynn Bowes-Sperry
    • 2
  • Karsten Jonsen
    • 3
  • Michèle Morner
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Reinhard-Mohn-Institute for Management and Corporate GovernanceWitten/Herdecke UniversityWittenGermany
  2. 2.College of BusinessWestern New England UniversitySpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.IMDLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.German University of Administrative Sciences SpeyerSpeyerGermany

Personalised recommendations