Managing Organizational Gender Diversity Images: A Content Analysis of German Corporate Websites
Although establishing gender equality in board and managerial positions has recently become more important for organizations, companies with low levels of gender diversity seem to perceive an ethical dilemma regarding the ways, in which they attempt to attain it. One way that organizations try to move toward gender equality is through the use of their corporate websites to manage potential applicants’ impressions of their current levels of, and actions to improve, gender diversity. The dilemma is whether to truthfully communicate their low level of gender diversity, conceal it, or exaggerate it. On the one hand, organizations that are truthful may find it difficult to achieve equality because women are less attracted to companies that lack diversity. On the other hand, organizations that are untruthful risk their moral legitimacy. The present work investigates gender diversity-related communication on the corporate websites of 99 major German companies. Based on theoretical work on minority attraction, we apply an organizational impression management taxonomy to guide our in-depth content analysis. With this approach, we hope to advance the understanding of how the issue of gender diversity is presented on corporate websites, which is useful for both organizational decision makers as well as diversity researchers. We found that although gender diversity-related communications on corporate websites contain both assertive and defensive organizational impression management tactics, as well as a third type of tactic we refer to as “acknowledgement,” assertive tactics were used more frequently. We argue the existence of a paradox whereby organizations use assertive impression management tactics to maintain pragmatic legitimacy but compromise their moral legitimacy by doing so. Furthermore, we argue that moral legitimacy can be maintained or restored through the sincere use of defensive impression management tactics and acknowledgement.
KeywordsGender diversity Impression management Corporate websites Employer image Gender equality Corporate legitimacy
- Auret, D., & Barrientos, S. (2006). Participatory social auditing: Developing a worker-focused approach. In S. Barrientos & C. Dolan (Eds.), Ethical sourcing in the global food system (pp. 129–148). New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Avery, D. R., & Johnson, C. D. (2008). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mixed messages regarding workforce diversity. In K. M. Thomas (Ed.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 221–247). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Volpone, S. D. (2013). Diversity staffing: Inclusive personnel recruitment and selection practices. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 282–299). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bellard, E., & Rüling, C. C. (2001). Reflections and projections of boundaries in the diversity management discourses in the United-States, France and Germany. In 17th EGOS colloquium, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
- Cappelli, P. (2001). Making the most of the online recruiting. Harvard Business Review, 79, 139–146.Google Scholar
- Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-connecting-corporate-performance-and-gender-diversity.
- Catalyst. (2011). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (2004–2008). Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-corporate-performance-and-womens-representation-boards-20042008.
- Catalyst. (2012). Women on boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2012-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors.
- Catalyst. (2013). Women in management, global comparison. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-management-global-comparison.
- Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2004). Recruitment on the net: How do organizational web site characteristics influence applicant attraction? Journal of Management, 30, 623–646.Google Scholar
- German Ministry of Family Affairs (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend & Bundesministerium). (2014). Response of the Government to the UNECE questionnaire on the implementation of the Beijing declaration (1995) and the outcome of the 23rd special session of the general assembly (2000). Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung4/Pdf-Anlagen/ueberpruefung-der-umsetzung-vonpekingenglisch,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf.
- German Ministry of Family Affairs and the Ministry of Justice (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend und Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz). (2015). Fragen und Antworten zu dem Gesetz für die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe von Frauen und Männern an Führungspositionen in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst. Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung4/Pdf-Anlagen/FAQ-gesetz-frauenquote,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf.
- Habermas, J. (1994). Remarks on discourse ethics. In J. Habermas (Ed.), Justification and applications (pp. 19–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Larkin, M. B., Bernardi, R. A., & Bosco, S. M. (2012). Board gender diversity, corporate reputation and market performance. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
- Mohamed, A., Gardner, W. L., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (1999). A taxonomy of organizational impression management tactics. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 7, 108–130.Google Scholar
- Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background paper for the World Development Report.Google Scholar
- Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations (pp. 21–43). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/-getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
- Suchmann, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
- Tedeschi, J. T., & Lindskold, S. (1976). Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Tedeschi, J. T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior (pp. 271–309). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., & Turner, C. (2014). The female FTSE board report 2014: Crossing the finish line. Cranfield: Cranfield School of Management. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/the-female-ftse-board-report-2014.
- Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Kidder, D. L., Cheung, H. K., Morner, M., & Lievens, F. (2016). Actions speak louder than words: Outsiders’ perceptions of diversity mixed messages. Journal of Applied Psychology. (in press).Google Scholar