We examine the link between a firm’s environmental (E) and social (S) disclosures and measures of its risk including total, systematic, and idiosyncratic risk. While we do not find any link between a firm’s E and S disclosures and its systematic risk, we find a negative and significant association between these disclosures and a firm’s total and idiosyncratic risk. These are novel findings and are consistent with the predictions of the stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm suggesting that firms which make extensive and objective E and S disclosures promote corporate transparency that can help them build a positive reputation and trust with their stakeholders. This in turn can help mitigate the firms' idiosyncratic/operational risk. These findings are important for all corporate stakeholders including managers, employees, and suppliers who have a significant economic interest in the survival and success of the firm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
While we do not have a specific hypothesis for the link between E and S disclosures and total risk of the firm as measured by stock volatility, for comparability of results with prior relevant studies (e.g. Jo and Na 2012), we also test this link.
For sake of brevity, the results discussed in this paragraph are not reported in the text, but are available upon request.
Capital asset pricing model
Corporate financial performance
Corporate social disclosure
Corporate social performance
Corporate social responsibility
Financial Times Stock Exchange Group
Green house gas
Global reporting initiative
International Organization for Standardization
Market to book ratio
Resource-based view (of the firm)
Return on assets
Standard industrial classification
Abdelghani, K. E. (2005). Informational content of the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(9), 928–935.
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5), 447–471.
Amit, R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Why do firms reduce business risk? Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 520–533.
Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5–32.
Benlemlih, M., & Girerd-Potin, I. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility affect firm financial risk? Evidence from international data. Working Paper, Financial Management Association European Conference (FMA), Maastricht (The Netherlands), 11–13 June 2014.
Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of values—A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.
Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258–1273.
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 639–647.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303–327.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(5), 122–144.
Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2009). Attributes of social and human capital disclosure and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(1), 71–88.
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2013). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on environmental legitimacy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431–450.
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2014). The impact of social responsibility disclosure and governance on financial analysts’ information environment. Corporate Governance, 14(4), 467–484.
Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.
Dye, R. A. (1985). Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 123–145.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 17950.
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–7798.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research. Accounting Forum, 36(2), 81–90.
Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 986–1014.
Hasseldine, J., Salama, A. I., & Toms, J. S. (2005). Quantity versus quality: The impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK Plcs. British Accounting Review, 37(2), 231–248.
Heal, G. M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. Geneva Papers, 30(3), 387–409.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–457.
Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Lee, D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213–237.
Lewellen, J. (1999). The time-series relations among expected return, risk, and book-to-market. Journal of Financial Economics, 54, 5–43.
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483–515.
Orens, R., Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2010). Web-based non-financial disclosure and cost of finance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37(9&10), 1057–1093.
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40(4), 369–396.
Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.
Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.
Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116.
Salama, A., Anderson, K., & Toms, S. (2011). Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994-2006. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(2), 192–204.
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, CSR strategy and corporate environmental and social performance in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585.
Toms, J. S. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. British Accounting Review, 34(3), 257–282.
Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2014). Are they any good at all? A financial and ethical analysis of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Asset Management, 15(1), 72–82.
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194.
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 97–180.
About this article
Cite this article
Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y. et al. Environmental and Social Disclosures and Firm Risk. J Bus Ethics 152, 613–626 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5
- Environmental and social disclosures
- Firm risk
- Voluntary disclosure
- Corporate social responsibility
- Stakeholder theory
- Resource-based view
- Risk management