Skip to main content

Trickle-Down Effects of Perceived Leader Integrity on Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model

Journal of Business Ethics volume 150, pages 837–851 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between the integrity of the supervisor and the manager (i.e., the supervisor’s immediate superior) and the creativity of employees who are below the supervisor. Drawing on social learning theory, we proposed a moderated mediation model for the trickle-down effects of perceived supervisor integrity. Using a sample of 716 employees and their supervisors, we found positive associations between both managers’ and supervisors’ integrity and employee creativity. Supervisors’ integrity partially mediates the relationship between managers’ integrity and employee creativity. In addition, supervisors’ perceptions of professional ethical standards moderate the indirect effects of the managers’ integrity on employee creativity. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. In this paper, we labeled three hierarchical levels as manager, supervisor, and employee in accordance with Mawritz et al. (2012) usage. Specifically, the term supervisor refers to front-line managers who hold in lower-level management positions. The term employee refers to the supervisor’s subordinates who report to the supervisor and typically at the lowest level in the company. The term manager refers to the supervisor’s immediate boss.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213–262). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Wirtz, P. W. (2012). Considering the source: The impact of leadership level on follower motivation and intent to stay. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(2), 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., Waldman, D. A., Avolio, B. J., & Webb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group and Organization Studies, 12, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, D. C. (2013). Leadership and the three faces of integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 414–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert, G. C. (2010). The limits and prospects of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 703–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, J. U., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Sosik, J. S., & Moon, H. K. (2009). Leadership across hierarchical levels: Multiple levels of management and multiple levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. B., & Gustafson, S. B. (1998). Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, L. L. (2012). Short-termism, the financial crisis, and corporate governance. Journal of Corporation Law, 37(2), 265–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. L., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–41). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felekoglu, B., & Moultrie, J. (2014). Top management involvement in new product development: A review and synthesis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M. S. (1989). Professional codes: Why, how and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of management annals (Vol. 1, pp. 439–477). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Berg, J. M., & Cable, D. M. (2014). Job titles as identity badges: How self-reflective titles can reduce emotional exhaustion. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1201–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs-Kleyn, N., & Kapelianis, D. (1999). The role of professional codes in regulating ethical conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business Psychology, 28, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan-Narasimhan, R., & Lawrence, B. S. (2012). Behavioral integrity: How leader referents and trust matter to workplace outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, E. J., De Brentani, U., & Salomo, S. (2007). Performance of global new product development programs: A resource-based view. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 546–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (1992). Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice-process theory. American Sociological Review, 57, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F., Edmondson, A. C., Thomke, S., & Worline, M. (2004). The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organization Science, 15(3), 310–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2002). How managers can spark creativity. In F. Hesselbein & R. Johnston (Eds.), On creativity, innovation, and renewal: A leader to leader guide (pp. 55–66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, H., Dierynck, B., Anseel, F., Simons, T., Halbesleben, J. R., McCaughey, D., et al. (2012a). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1273–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, H., Palanski, M. E., & Simons, T. (2012b). Authentic leadership and behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1090–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Cheng, W., Ribbens, B., & Zhou, J. (2013). Linking ethical leadership to employee creativity: Knowledge sharing and self-efficacy as mediators. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(9), 1409–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65, 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Kunenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., Darnold, T. C., & Priesemuth, M. (2013). Perceived leader integrity: Supporting the construct validity and utility of a multi-dimensional measure in two samples. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. B. (1989). Reliability and validity of a factor analytically derived measure of leadership behavior and characteristics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 911–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). MPlus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis of integrity tests validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Vogelgesang, G. R. (2011). Virtuous creativity: The effects of leader behavioural integrity on follower creative thinking and risk taking. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2009). Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Impact of behavioral integrity on follower job performance: A three-study examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 765–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prottas, D. J. (2008). Perceived behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee attitudes, well-being, and absenteeism. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prottas, D. J. (2013). Relationships among employee perception of their manager’s behavioral integrity, moral distress, and employee attitudes and well-Being. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 1–31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Wolfe, M. (2011). Moving forward from project failure: Negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1229–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (1999). Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (2008). The integrity dividend: Leading by the power of your word. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

  • Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L., & Parks, J. M. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., Leroy, H., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., Palanski, M., & Trevino, L. (2013). Toward a broader—but still rigorous—definition of leader integrity: Commentary. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 391–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T., Tomlinson, E. C., & Leroy, H. (2011). Research on behavioral integrity: A promising construct for positive organizational scholarship. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 325–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2002). Leaders as Moral Role Models: The Case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (Or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E. C., Lewicki, R. J., & Ash, S. R. (2014). Disentangling the moral integrity construct: Values congruence as a moderator of the behavioral integrity-citizenship relationship. Group and Organization Management, 39, 720–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Professional ethical standards, corporate social responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., Godkin, L., Fleischman, G. M., & Kidwell, D. (2011). Corporate ethical values, group creativity, job satisfaction and turnover intention: The impact of work context on work response. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2010). Giving voice in a culture of silence: From a culture of compliance to a culture of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24, 266–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Agle, B. (2005). Somebody I look up to: Ethical role models in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. W., & Lean, E. (2008). The impact of perceived leader integrity on subordinates in a work team environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G., & Barenbaum, N. B. (1985). Responsibility and the power motive in women and men. Journal of Personality, 53, 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Lepine, J., Buckman, B., & Wei, F. (2014). It’s not fair… or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor–job performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 675–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Woodman, R. W. (2003). Managers’ recognition of employees’ creative ideas. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on innovation (pp. 631–640). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71272070) and the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 1509093) for their financial support.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Business Administration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

      He Peng

    2. Department of Business Administration, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

      Feng Wei

    Authors
    1. He Peng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Feng Wei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Feng Wei.

    Additional information

    He Peng and Feng Wei have contributed equally to this project, and thus the order of authorship is alphabetical.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Peng, H., Wei, F. Trickle-Down Effects of Perceived Leader Integrity on Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model. J Bus Ethics 150, 837–851 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3226-3

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3226-3

    Keywords

    • Employee creativity
    • Leader integrity
    • Professional ethical standards
    • Social learning
    • Trickle-down