On the Value of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Bond Issues in China
- 2.5k Downloads
We provide the first comprehensive and robust evidence on the relationship between CSR disclosure quality and the costs of corporate bonds in China. We find that firms with high CSR disclosure quality are associated with lower costs of corporate bonds. Our findings are robust to endogeneity issues arising from reverse causality, omitted variable bias, and the interdependencies between price and non-price terms. The negative relationship between CSR disclosure quality and the costs of corporate bonds is stronger in weak corporate governance firms and in firms located in regions with weak institutional environments. We also find that firms’ misconduct significantly mitigates the influence of CSR disclosure quality. In the additional analyses, we provide evidence that CSR disclosure can offer incremental information beyond the credit ratings. Regarding non-price terms, we conclude that firms with higher quality of CSR information are less likely to be subject to collateral terms, but they tend to include more restrictive covenants. Further analyses also show that compared with low-quality or mandatory CSR disclosure firms, bond investors perceive firms with CSR disclosures rated above “A” categories or voluntary CSR disclosure as less likely to cause asymmetric information problems and thus charge lower risk premiums. Overall, this study demonstrates that CSR disclosure quality is an important determinant that affects both price and non-price bond contract terms.
KeywordsCorporate bonds Corporate social responsibility Costs of corporate bonds Bond contract terms
Corporate social responsibility
China securities regulatory commission
We are especially grateful to the section editor (Dr. Steven Dellaportas) and two anonymous reviewers for their many insightful suggestions and constructive comments. We thank the funding supported by the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Grant no. 20130161110045).
- El-Gazzar, S. M. (1998). Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods. The Accounting Review, 73(1), 119–129.Google Scholar
- Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). NERI index of marketization of China’s Provinces 2009 report. Beijing: Economic Science Press. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Ivanov, I. T., Santos, J. A., & Vo, T. (2016). The transformation of banking: Tying loan interest rates to borrowers’ CDS spreads. Journal of Corporate Finance. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.005.
- McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
- Sengupta, P. (1998). Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review, 73(4), 459–475.Google Scholar
- Wu, W., Johan, S. A., & Rui, O. M. (2014). Institutional investors, political connections, and the incidence of regulatory enforcement against corporate fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Xia, L., & Fang, Z. (2005). Government control, institutional environment and firm value. Economic Research Journal, 5, 40–51. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Zhong, H., et al. (2015). Corporate responsibility reporting in China 2014. Beijing: Economic Management Press. (In Chinese).Google Scholar