Skip to main content
Log in

See What We Want to See? The Effects of Managerial Experience on Corporate Green Investments

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How impartial are managerial decisions? This question is particularly concerning when it comes to making green investment decisions in the face of stakeholder pressures. When managers respond to stakeholder pressures, their personal cognition, judgment, and past experiences play a role in determining their responses. The salience of particular stakeholder claims may be determined by deeply rooted individual preferences. This research investigates how a manager’s past experiences can influence green investments. Data are gathered from 247 managers about their past experience and their employer’s performance data. These data are combined with managerial responses to a vignette-based experiment, which required managers to make green investments based on a decision scenario where they are exposed to different types and strength of stakeholder pressure (from consumers and the community). Results suggest that managers’ years of experience, their employers’ financial performance, and their employers’ market performance influence investment decisions even when making decisions under new and different set of circumstances. While the employers’ financial performance influences managers to invest more, the employers’ market performance only influences managers’ investment in the presence of either high consumer or high community pressure. Compared to less-experienced managers, experienced managers invest more in response to consumer pressure but less in response to community pressure. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings in green management are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to Ceos? an investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and Ceo values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, C., & Amato, L. (2011). Corporate commitment to global quality of life issues: Do slack resources, industry affiliations, and multinational headquarters matter? Business and Society, 50(2), 388–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D., & Jones, S. (2010). The upside of irrationality: The unexpected benefits of defying logic at work and at home (Vol. 159). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Fried, Y. (1988). The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41(4), 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ateş, M. A., Bloemhof, J., van Raaij, E. M., & Wynstra, F. (2012). Proactive environmental strategy in a supply chain context: The mediating role of investments. International Journal of Production Research, 50(4), 1079–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2001). Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 489–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 3(4), 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1989). The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., Hollos, D., & Paulraj, A. (2014). Green procurement and green supplier development: Antecedents and effects on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(1), 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1998). Structural equation models. New York: Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2012). Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1981). Schlumberger: The star of the oil fields tackles semi-conductors, pp. 60–70.

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Trevino, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of Ceos: the influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Manzon, G. B., & Zamora, V. L. (2013). Contextual and individual dimensions of taxpayer decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 631–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2013). Towards charity accountability: Narrowing the gap between provision and needs? Public Management Review, 15(7), 945–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of us environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., Gordon, I. M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the department identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(1), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation—Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific sociological review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E. (1993). Interpretations on automatic: A different view of strategic issue diagnosis. Journal of Management Studies, 30(3), 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, T., Eden, D., & Avolio, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerd, S., & Bendoly, E. (2011). Introduction to the discussion forum on using experiments in supply chain management research. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm Responses to Secondary Stakeholder Action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2011). Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G. W. (1967). Personal value system of american managers. Academy of Management Journal, 10(1), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. (1996). Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 715–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision making in the us metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (1999). Information-processing alternatives for coping with manufacturing environment complexity. Decision Sciences, 30(4), 1021–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraj-Andrés, E., Martinez, E., & Matute, J. (2009a). A multidimensional approach to the influence of environmental marketing and orientation on the firm’s organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraj-Andrés, E., Martinez-Salinas, E., & Matute-Vallejo, J. (2009b). A multidimensional approach to the influence of environmental marketing and orientation on the firm’s organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2014). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews., 17(4), 483–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E., Lo, C. W. H., & Chung, S. S. (2004). Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of ems effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 33(2), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker, T. F., Carter, C. R., Huang, X., & Tate, W. L. (2014). Managerial commitment to sustainable supply chain management projects. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(4), 318–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goltz, S. M. (1993). Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences, 24(5), 977–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito, J. (2007). A theory of Purchasing’s contribution to business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 901–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2006). The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research, 44(7), 1353–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualandris, J., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2015). Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders. Journal of Operations Management, 38, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, K., & Swanson, S. R. (2003). A model of fan identification: Antecedents and sponsorship outcomes. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(3), 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2000). Environmental Supply Chain Dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8(6), 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1990). Ethical values of individuals at different levels in the organizational hierarchy of a single firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 741–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sharma, S. (2005). Pathways of stakeholder influence in the canadian forestry industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(6), 384–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (1980). Judgement and choice. New York: WIley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, B., Zhao, X., & Zhou, H. (2013). The effects of competitive environment on supply chain information sharing and performance: An empirical study in China. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 552–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kach, A., Busse, C., Azadegan, A., & Wagner, S. M. (2016). Maneuvering through hostile environments: How firms leverage product and process innovativeness. Decision Sciences. doi:10.1111/deci.12196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, R. (2000). Competitive priorities and managerial performance: A taxonomy of small manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 18(6), 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. (1984). Impartiality and participant-interest theories of organizational-effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Depledge, G., & Rai, A. (2007). Escalation: The role of problem recognition and cognitive bias. Decision Sciences, 38(3), 391–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research. Boston, MA: Cengage Lerning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D. (2001). Plant-level environmental management orientation: The influence of management views and plant characteristics. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knemeyer, A. M., & Naylor, R. W. (2011). Using behavioral experiments to expand our horizons and deepen our understanding of logistics and supply chain decision making. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurian, L. (2004). Public participation in environmental decision making: Findings from communities facing toxic waste cleanup. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, H., Töyli, J., Solakivi, T., Hälinen, H.-M., & Ojala, L. (2012). Effects of geographic dispersion on intra-firm supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6), 611–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi, P., Sims, H. P., & Slocum, J. W. (1981). Perceived environmental uncertainty: An individual or environmental attribute? Journal of Management, 7(2), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, J. M., & Elam, J. J. (1992). A comparative study of how experts and novices use a decision aid to solve problems in complex knowledge domains. Information Systems Research, 3(2), 150–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2003). Nature of corporate responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers. Journal of Business Research, 56(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1981). Decision making perspectives: Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on prganizsation design and behavior (pp. 205–244). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. G. (2011). The nexus between decision making and emotion regulation: A review of convergent neurocognitive substrates. Behavioural Brain Research, 217(1), 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, M. M., & Mowen, J. C. (1986). An empirical examination of the biasing effects of framing on business decisions*. Decision Sciences, 17(4), 596–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garces-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (2010). Psychometric Theory 3e: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Krause, D. R. (1999). A multiple-method study of environmental uncertainty and manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 17(3), 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannakis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Values, attitudes and perceptions of managers as predictors of corporate environmental responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 100(15), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A., Klassen, R. D., & Russo, M. V. (2011). Efficiency meets accountability: Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J. A., Scott, G. J., & Angelopoulos, G. (2013). Benchmarking tendencies in managerial mindsets: Prioritizing stockholders and stakeholders in Peru, South Africa, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 589–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, N., & Datta, D. K. (1996). Ceo characteristics: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2003). Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An Empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxas, B., & Coetzer, A. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rungtusanatham, M., Wallin, C., & Eckerd, S. (2011). The vignette in a scenario-based role-playing experiment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, S., Ozanne, L. K., Smallman, C., & Cullen, R. (2010). Consumer driven corporate environmentalism: Fact or fiction? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(6), 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P. (2009). The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management: Trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Nguan, O. (1999). The biotechnology industry and strategies of biodiversity conservation: The influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(1), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational research methods, 13(3), 456–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (Vol. 35, pp. 35–65). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, M. C. (2003). Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: Meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. Journal of Management, 29(5), 609–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Wrochel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cranenburgh, K. C., Liket, K., & Roome, N. (2013). Management responses to social activism in an era of corporate responsibility: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez Brust, D. A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (2010). Environmental management intentions: An empirical investigation of Argentina’s polluting firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5), 1111–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. J., Huber, G. P., & Glick, W. H. (1995). Functional background as a determinant of executives’ selective perception. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 943–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. I. (2008). Building chains and directing flows: Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business & Society, 47(1), 68–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu, L. R., & Song, L. N. (2009). Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Foerstl.

Appendix: Interaction Charts

Appendix: Interaction Charts

See Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaltenbrand, B., Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A. et al. See What We Want to See? The Effects of Managerial Experience on Corporate Green Investments. J Bus Ethics 150, 1129–1150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3191-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3191-x

Keywords

Navigation