Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 150, Issue 4, pp 1089–1104 | Cite as

Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100

  • Dayuan Li
  • Min Huang
  • Shenggang Ren
  • Xiaohong Chen
  • Lutao Ning
Article

Abstract

Firms worldwide are increasingly required to disclose (and make efforts to reduce) their carbon emissions due to the environmental damage associated with climate change. Because there has been no previous literature focusing on the determinants of corporate carbon disclosure integrating environmental legitimacy and green innovation, the present study attempted to develop an original framework to fill the research gap. This study explored the influence of environmental legitimacy (an external informal mechanism) on corporate carbon disclosure, and investigated the role of green innovation (an internal formal mechanism) as a mediator. With the samples of Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) in China from 2008 to 2012, the results demonstrate that environmental legitimacy significantly negatively influences the likelihood of corporate carbon disclosure, and that green process innovation mediates the relationship, while green product innovation has no significant mediating effect. It means that environmental legitimacy not only directly affects the likelihood of corporate carbon disclosure, but also indirectly affects it via green process innovation. Hence, companies must increase both informal and formal mechanisms, i.e., external environmental legitimacy and internal green process innovation, to engage in carbon information disclosure and ensure sustainability.

Keywords

Environmental legitimacy Corporate carbon disclosure Green product innovation Green process innovation Carbon Disclosure Project China Emerging economies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71202055; 71372064; 71431006), Major project of National Social Sciences Fund of China (Grant No. 15ZDA020), Innovative Research Group National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71221061), and Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 13jzd0016). The authors thank the Editors and referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alakent, E., & Ozer, M. (2014). Can companies buy legitimacy? Using corporate political strategies to offset negative corporate social responsibility records. Journal of Strategy and Management, 7(4), 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5), 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2014). Green corporate image: Moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, D., Sweeney, D., Williams, T., Camm, J., & Cochran, J. (2013). Statistics for business & economics. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  6. Apergis, N., Eleftheriou, S., & Payne, J. E. (2013). The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 88, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
  9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘CEO-speak’ after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belkaoui, A. (1976). The impact of the disclosure of the environmental effects of organizational behavior on the market. Financial Management, 5, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., & McIlkenny, P. (2015). Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1.Google Scholar
  13. Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caruana, R., & Chatzidakis, A. (2014). Consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Toward a multi-level, multi-agent conceptualization of the “other CSR”. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan, R. Y. (2005). Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 625–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang, C. H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, 32(6), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2014). Environmental disclosures and impression management. In R. P. Hart (Ed.), Communication and language analysis in the corporate world (p. 217). IGI-Global: Hershey, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment., 24(6), 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Daft, R. (2012). Organization theory and design. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  26. De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2010). A framework for the integration of environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity. In: The 6th Asia Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting (APIRA) conference, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(6), 504–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Depoers, F., Jeanjean, T., & Jérôme, T. (2014). Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferguson, M. J., Lam, K. C., & Lee, G. M. (2002). Voluntary disclosure by state-owned enterprises listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 13(2), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (2005). Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting, 40(3), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005). A study of the motivations for the environmental transformation of companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harmes, A. (2011). The limits of carbon disclosure: Theorizing the business case for investor environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hockerts, K., & Morsing, M. (2008). A literature review on corporate social responsibility in the innovation process (pp. 1–28). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS), Center for Corporate Social Responsibility.Google Scholar
  41. Hofer, C., Cantor, D. E., & Dai, J. (2012). The competitive determinants of a firm’s environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hrasky, S. (2011). Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: Symbolism or action? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(1), 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kammerer, D. (2009). The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68(8), 2285–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2014). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuo, L., & Yi-Ju Chen, V. (2013). Is environmental disclosure an effective strategy on establishment of environmental legitimacy for organization? Management Decision, 51(7), 1462–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, S. Y., Park, Y. S., & Klassen, R. D. (2013). Market responses to firms’ voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management., 22(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793–2799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, F., & Ding, D. Z. (2013). The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 506–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V., & Soobaroyen, T. (2011). Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum, 35(3), 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., Shi, J. J., Qi, G. Y., & Zhang, Z. B. (2014). The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Noci, G., & Verganti, R. (1999). Managing ‘green’ product innovation in small firms. R & D Management, 29(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pellegrino, C., & Lodhia, S. (2012). Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: Exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peng, J., Sun, J., & Luo, R. (2015). Corporate voluntary carbon information disclosure: Evidence from China’s listed companies. The World Economy, 38(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.Google Scholar
  61. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rashid, A., & Lodh, S. C. (2008). The influence of ownership structures and board practices on corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rennings, K. (1998). Towards a theory and policy of eco-innovation-neoclassical and (co-) evolutionary perspectives (No. 98-24). ZEW Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
  64. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2009). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sezen, B., & Çankaya, S. Y. (2013). Effects of green manufacturing and eco-innovation on sustainability performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stanny, E., & Ely, K. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(6), 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The performance of green supply chain management governance mechanisms: A supply network and complexity perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2136–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tilling, M. V., & Tilt, C. A. (2010). The edge of legitimacy: Voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans’ 1956–1999 annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yalabik, B., & Fairchild, R. J. (2011). Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(2), 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dayuan Li
    • 1
  • Min Huang
    • 1
  • Shenggang Ren
    • 1
  • Xiaohong Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lutao Ning
    • 3
  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center of Resource-conserving & Environment-friendly Society and Ecological Civilization, School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Hunan University of CommerceChangshaChina
  3. 3.School of Business and ManagementQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations