Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 150, Issue 1, pp 211–225 | Cite as

Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China

  • Lin Liao
  • Teng (Philip) Lin
  • Yuyu ZhangEmail author


This paper investigates the association between board characteristics and the company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance decision in China. By examining 2054 firm-years of Chinese listed companies with CSR reports from 2008 to 2012, we find that firms with a large board size, more female directors, and separation of CEO and chairman positions are more likely to engage in CSR assurance. Gender diversity also influences the CSR assurance provider choice. However, board independence and overseas background of the CEO do not affect the CSR assurance decision. Inconsistent with our prediction, firms with foreign directors are less likely to engage in voluntary CSR assurance. In summary, this research provides in-depth insights into the determinants of Chinese firms’ voluntary CSR assurance.


Assurance Corporate governance Corporate social responsibility China 


  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the board and their impact on governance andperformance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanism to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and social influence. Scientific American, 193, 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beasley, C. E. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relationship between the board of directors composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71, 443–465.Google Scholar
  6. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660.Google Scholar
  8. Carson, E. (2009). Industry specialization by global audit firm networks. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance and fraud: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, M., Green, W., & Ko, J. (2015). The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors’ decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(1), 131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2014). CSR report assurance in the USA: An empirical investigation of determinants and effects. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 5(2), 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, D. C. (2003). Corporate governance in China: An overview. China Economic Review, 14(4), 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. R., & Simnett, R. (2015). CSR and assurance services: A research agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahya, J., Karbhari, Y., Xiao, J. Z., & Yang, M. (2003). The usefulness of the supervisory board report in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(4), 308–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674–686.Google Scholar
  17. Dang, R., Nguyen, D. K., & Vo, L. (2009). Women on corporate boards and firm performance: A comparative study. Available from
  18. Das, P. K. (2014). The role of corporate governance in foreign investments. Applied Financial Economics, 24(3), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2009). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. Deegan, C. M., Cooper, B. J., & Shelly, M. (2006). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 329–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, R. (1997). Assurance service opportunities: Implications for academia. Accounting Horizons, 11(4), 61–74.Google Scholar
  22. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan, G., Wang, X., & Ma, G. (2011). Contribution of marketization to China’s economic growth. Economic Research Journal, 9, 4–16.Google Scholar
  25. Fields, L. P., Fraser, D. R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2012). Board quality and the cost of debt capital: The case of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 1536–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings—evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galbraith, J. (2010). Corporate governance practices that address climate change: An exploratory study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 335–350.Google Scholar
  28. Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4(3), 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2002). CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hillman, A., Cannella, A., & Paetzold, R. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huggins, A., Green, W., & Simnett, R. (2011). The competitive market for assurance engagements on greenhouse gas statements: Is there a role for assurers from the accounting profession? Current Issues in Auditing, 5(2), A1–A12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibrahim, N., & Angelidis, J. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(5), 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., & Tomic, I. (2009). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationship. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.Google Scholar
  39. Konrad, A., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. KPMG. (2008). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. London: KPMG LLP.Google Scholar
  41. KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. London: KPMG LLP.Google Scholar
  42. Kristie, J. (2011). The power of three. Director Boards, 35(5), 22–32.Google Scholar
  43. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silances, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lane, J. C. (1995). Ethics of business students: Some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(7), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lau, C., Lu, Y., & Liang, Q. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in China: A corporate governance approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, Z., Guan, F., & Li, Z. Q. (2013). An empirical research on drivers of corporate social responsibility report attestation: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Auditing Research, 3, 102–112.Google Scholar
  48. Li, Z., & Li, Z. Q. (2012). Information content of corporate social responsibility report attestation opinion: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Auditing Research, 1, 78–86.Google Scholar
  49. Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social reporting in China: Symbol or substance. Organization Science, 25, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—the effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 527–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, T., & Triana, M. C. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board-diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 755–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mock, T. J., Strohm, C., & Swartz, K. M. (2007). An examination of worldwide assured sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moroney, R., Windsor, C., & Aw, Y. T. (2012). Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: An empirical analysis. Accounting and Finance, 52(3), 903–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, R. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance: An examination of recent sustainability assurance practice. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Neill, H. M., Saunders, C. B., & McCarthy, A. D. (1989). Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oxelheim, L., Gregorič, A., Randøy, T., & Thomsen, S. (2013). On the internationalization of corporate boards: The case of Nordic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 2369–2392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perego, P. (2009). Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: An international study of sustainability reporting. International Journal of Management, 26(3), 412–487.Google Scholar
  64. Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2015). The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  68. Pflugrath, G., Roebuck, P. J., & Simnett, R. (2011). Impact of assurance and assurer’s professional affiliation on financial analysts? Assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shen, H. T., Wang, L. Y., & Wan, T. (2011). Can corporate social report and assurance be effective signals? Auditing Research, 4, 87–93.Google Scholar
  70. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Solomon, J. (2009). Corporate governance and accountability (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  72. Tihanyi, L. D., Griffith, A., & Russel, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wallage, P. (2000). Assurance on sustainability reporting: An auditor’s view. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wong, R., & Millington, A. (2014). Corporate social disclosure: A user perspective on assurance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 863–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xie, X. B. (2009). Operational complexity, ownership characteristics and the determinant of board structure (Chinese Version). Economic Review, 9(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
  77. Casey, R., & Grenier, J. (2015). Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States. Auditing, 34(1), 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yang, J. D., Yang, X. Q., & Sun, L. (2008). Research on the association between boards characteristics and earnings management in listed firms (Chinese Version). Communication of Finance and Accounting, 8(1), 117–119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southwestern University of Finance and EconomicsChengduChina
  2. 2.Shantou UniversityShantouChina
  3. 3.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations