While prior ecolabel research suggests that consumers’ trust of ecolabel sponsors is associated with their purchase of ecolabeled products, we know little about how third-party certification might relate to consumer purchases when trust varies. Drawing on cognitive theory and a stratified random sample of more than 1200 consumers, we assess how third-party certification relates to consumers’ use of ecolabels across different program sponsors. We find that consumers’ trust of government and environmental NGOs to provide credible environmental information encourages consumers’ use of ecolabels sponsored by these entities, and consumers do not differentiate between certified versus uncertified ecolabels in the presence of trust. By contrast, consumers’ distrust of private business to provide credible environmental information discourages their use of business association-sponsored ecolabels. However, these ecolabels may be able to overcome consumer distrust if their sponsors certify the ecolabels using third-party auditors. These findings are important to sponsors who wish develop ecolabels that are more credible to consumers, and thus encourage more widespread ecolabel use.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The European Eco Flower is now known as the EU Ecolabel.
Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mandelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140–1167.
Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley.
Aguilar, F. X., & Vlosky, R. P. (2006). Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the U.S. Forest Policy Economics, 9(8), 1100–1112.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–891.
Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. (1995). An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271–286.
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33–45.
Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.
Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, S. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting student’s car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264–285.
Banerjee, A., & Solomon, B. D. (2003). Eco-Labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: A meta-evaluation of the US programs. Energy Policy, 31(2), 109–123.
Bjørner, T. B., Hansen, L. G., & Russell, C. S. (2004). Environmental labeling and consumers’ choice—An empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3), 411–434.
Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 3–21.
Bowen, F. (2014). After greenwashing: Symbolic corporate environmentalism and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising, 22(3), 27–39.
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driver (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance, 15(4), 503–529.
Catska, P., & Corbett, J. (2014). Governance of eco-labels, expert opinion and media coverage. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2474-3.
Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.
Darnall, N., & Aragón-Correa, J. A. (2014). Can ecolabels influence firms’ sustainability strategy and stakeholder behaviors? Organization & Environment, 27(4), 319–327.
Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2005). Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38(2–3), 71–90.
Darnall, N., Ponting, C., & Vazquez-Brust, D. A. (2012). Why consumers buy green. In D. Vazquez-Brust & J. Sarkis (Eds.), Green growth: Managing the transition to sustainable capitalism (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: Springer.
Darnall, N., Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2010). Sponsorship matters: Assessing business participation in government-and industry-sponsored voluntary environmental programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 283–307.
Darnall, N., & Sides, S. (2008). Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: Does certification matter? Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 95–117.
Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences, 38(2–3), 91–106.
Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Balzarova, M. (2013). Choosing the right eco-label for your product. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(4), 10–12.
Dendler, L. (2014). Sustainable meta labeling: An effective measure to facilitate more sustainable consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 74–83.
Dietz, F. J., & Vollebergh, R. H. J. (1999). Explaining instrument choice in environmental policies. In J. C. M. van den Bergh (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and resource economics (pp. 339–351). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Doherty, E. D., Campbell, S., Hynes, D., & van Rensburg, T. M. (2013). Examining labelling effects within discrete choice experiments: An application to recreational site choice. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 94–104.
Ecolabel Index. (2014). http://www.ecolabelindex.com. Accessed Nov 29, 2015.
Ecolabel Index. (2016). All Ecolabels. http://www.ecolabelindex.com/ecolabels/. Accessed 6 April 2016.
Eisend, M., & Küster, F. (2011). The effectiveness of publicity versus advertising: A meta-analytic investigation of its moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 906–921.
Ethier, G. R., Poe, G. L., Schultze, W. D., & Clark, J. (2000). A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs. Land Economics, 76, 54–67.
Eurobarometer. (2013). Attitudes of Europeans towards Building the Single Market for Green Products. Flash Eurobarometer 367. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_367_en.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2015.
Eurobarometer. (2014). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment, Special Eurobarometer 416. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_en.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2015.
Finch, D., Deephouse, D., & Varella, P. (2015). Examining an individual’s legitimacy judgment using the value-attitude system: The role of environmental and economic values and source credibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 265–281.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Gamper-Rabindran, S. (2006). Did the EPA’s voluntary industrial toxics program reduce plants’ emissions? A GIS analysis of distributional impacts and a by-media analysis of substitution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52(1), 391–410.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
Huang, C. L. (1993). Simultaneous-equation model for estimating consumer risk perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for residue-free produce. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27(2), 377–396.
Huang, C. L., Kan, K., & Fu, T.-T. (1999). Consumer willingness to pay for food safety in Taiwan: A binary-ordinal probit model of analysis. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(1), 76–91.
Hussain, S. S. (2000). Green consumerism and ecolabelling: A strategic behavioural model. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 77–89.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2010). Past events. http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/news_and_events.htm. February 13, 2010.
Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 9–22.
Jiang, P., Jones, D. B., & Javie, S. (2008). How third-party certification programs relate to consumer trust in online transactions: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 25(9), 839–858.
Johnstone, N. (2007). Environmental policy and corporate behaviour. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, P. (2003). A guide to econometrics (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.
Lee, K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 573–586.
Loureiro, M. L., McCluskey, J. J., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (2001). Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2), 404–416.
Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409.
Noblet, C. L., Teisl, M. F., & Rubin, J. (2006). Factors affecting consumer assessment of eco-labeled vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(6), 422–431.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2015). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
O’Brien, K. A., & Teisl, M. F. (2004). Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products. Journal of Forest Economics, 10(2), 75–96.
O’Rourke, D. (2012). Shopping for good. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oates, C., McDonald, S., Alevizou, P., Hwang, K., Young, W., & McMorland, L. (2008). Marketing sustainability: Use of information sources and degrees of voluntary simplicity. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(5), 351–365.
Organic Trade Association. (2015). http://ota.com/sites/default/files/indexed_files/StateOfOrganicIndustry_0.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2015.
Pavlou, P., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption. An extension of TPB. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.
Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2006). Caveat emptor—Let the buyer beware! Environmental labelling and the limitations of ‘green’ consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 15–29.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745–769.
Scammon, D. L., & Mayer, R. N. (1995). Agency review of environmental marketing claims: Case-by-case decomposition of the issues. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 33–43.
Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.
Shen, J., & Saijo, T. (2009). Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers’ purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3561–3573.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–334.
Soil Association UK. (2015). http://www.soilassociation.org/news/newsstory/articleid/7805/organic-market-shows-improved-growth-amidst-tumbling-food-prices. Accessed 12/01/2015.
Sparks, B. A., Perkins, H. E., & Buckley, R. (2013). Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior. Tourism Management, 39, 1–9.
Starobin, S., & Weinthal, E. (2010). The search for credible information in social and environmental global governance: the kosher label. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1–35.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2005). Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. British Food Journal, 107(11), 808–822.
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., & Daddi, T. (2012). What Factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecological Economics, 82, 88–96.
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Vaccari, A., & Ferrari, E. (2015). Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: Evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4), 252–265.
Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P., & Olesen, A. (2010). Understanding consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1787–1810.
Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.
Valliant, M. (2014). Top 10 reasons why organic food is more expensive. HellaWella. http://www.hellawella.com/top-10-reasons-organic-food-is-so-expensive/4727. Accessed February 2, 2016.
Van Dam, Y. K., & De Jonge, J. (2015). The positive side of negative labelling. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(1), 19–38.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1991). Are you thinking what I think you are: A study of actual and estimated goal priorities and decision preferences of resource managers, environmentalists and the public. Society and Natural Resources, 4(2), 177–196.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behaviour from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580–1607.
The authors thank the Economic and Social Research Council and Social Science Research Council for funding a portion of this research.
About this article
Cite this article
Darnall, N., Ji, H. & Vázquez-Brust, D.A. Third-Party Certification, Sponsorship, and Consumers’ Ecolabel Use. J Bus Ethics 150, 953–969 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3138-2
- Environmental label
- Ecolabel sponsor
- Consumer perceptions
- Ecolabel credibility
- Third-party certification