Abstract
Businesses have long been admonished for being unduly focused on the pursuit of profit. However, there are some organizations whose purpose is not exclusively economic to the extent that they seek to constitute common good. Building on Christian ethics as a starting point, our article shows how the pursuit of the common good of the firm can serve as a guide for humanistic management. It provides two principles that humanistic management can attempt to implement: first, that community good is a condition for the realization of personal good, and second, that community good can only be promoted if it is oriented towards personal good. To better understand which community good can favor personal good and how it can be achieved, we examine two recent humanistic movements—Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion—that strive to participate in the common good. From the analysis of these two movements, we identify a shared managerial willingness to adopt the two principles. Moreover, we also reveal that Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion present different ways of linking community good and personal good, and therefore, different means exist for firms to participate in the common good.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our coverage of data included eight entrepreneurs’ testimonies, one academic thesis and 51 research theses, 27 conference presentations (Brasilia, 25–29 May 2011; Paris, 10 September 2011; Paris, 17 October 2013; Aix-en-Provence, 21 January 2012), 20 presentations at the UNESCO conference (2008), four reports on the Economy of Communion, and three essays.
References
Abela, A. V. (2001). Profit and more: Catholic social teaching and the purpose of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 107–116.
Aburdene, P. (2005). Megatrends 2010: The rise of conscious capitalism. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads.
Acevedo, A. (2012). Personalist business ethics and humanistic management: Insights from Jacques Maritain. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 197–219.
Alford, H., & Naughton, M. (2002). Beyond the shareholder model of the firm: Working toward the common good of a business. In S. A. Cortright & M. J. Naughton (Eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business: Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic social tradition (pp. 27–47). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Aquinas, St. T. (1947) [1273]. Summa theologica. New York: Benziger Bros.
Argandona, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1093–1102.
Argiolas, G. (2009). Economia di comunione e management: un modello di lettura [Economy of communion and management: A model of reading]. Revue Impresa Sociale, 78(3), 122–140.
Argiolas, G., Baldarelli, M.-G., Ferrone, C., & Parolin, G. (2010). Spirituality and economic democracy: The case of Loppiano Prima. In L. Bouckaert & P. Arena (Eds.), Respect and economic democracy (pp. 155–172). Antwerp: Garant.
Baldarelli, M.-G. (2011). Le aziende dell’economia di comunione. Mission, governance e accountability. Rome: Città Nuova.
Barnes, J. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bruni, L. (Ed.). (2002). The economy of communion. New York: New City Press.
Bruni, L., & Smerilli, A. (2009). The value of vocation: The crucial role of intrinsically motivated people in value-based organisations. Review of Social Economy, 67(3), 271–288.
Bruni, L., & Uelmen, A. (2006). Religious values and corporate decision making: The economy of communion project. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 11(3), 645–680.
Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2004). The ‘economy of communion’: Inspirations and achievements. Revue Finance et Bien Commun, 20, 91–97.
Buber, M. (1937). I and thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Byron, W. J. (1988). Twin towers: A philosophy and theology of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), 525–530.
Cortright, S. A., & Naughton, M. (Eds.). (2002). Rethinking the purpose of business: Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic social tradition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
De Bettignies, H.-C., & Lépineux, F. (2009). Can multinational corporations afford to ignore the global common good? Business and Society Review, 114(2), 153–182.
Deissenberg, C. G., & Alvarez, G. (2002). Cheating for the common good in a macroeconomic policy game. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26(9/10), 1457–1479.
Denison, D., Hoojberg, R., & Quinn, R. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.
Evangelii Gaudium. (2013). Available at https://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html.
Fessard, G. (1944). Autorité et bien commun. Paris: Aubier.
Finnis, J. (1986). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2011). ‘No strings attached’: Welcoming the existential gift in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 63–75.
Fyke, J. P., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). The ethics of conscious capitalism: Wicked problems in leading change and changing leaders. Human Relations, 66(12), 1619–1643.
Gallagher, J., & Buckeye, J. (2014). The business practices of the economy of communion. New York: New City Press.
Gold, L. (2004). The ‘economy of communion’: A case study of business and civil society in partnership for change. Development in Practice, 14(5), 633–644.
Gold, L. (2010). New financial horizons: The emergence of an economy of communion. New York: New City Press.
Guidelines to running an Economy of Communion Business (GECB) (2011). Available at http://www.edc-online.org/en/businesses/guidelines-for-conducting-a-business.html.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Belgium: Nelson Parker.
Lubich, C. (2001). L’economia di comunione, storia e profezia. Rome: Città Nuova.
Lubich, C. (2007). Essential writings: Spirituality, dialogue, culture (compiled and edited by M. Vandeleene). London: New City Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2013). Liberating the heroic spirit of business: Conscious capitalism. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.
Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.
Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a community of persons: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.
Melé, D., & Schlag, M. (Eds.). (2015). Humanism in economics and business: Perspectives of the Catholic social tradition. Dordrecht: Springer.
Messner, J. (1965). Social ethics: Natural law in the modern world. Saint Louis, MO: Herder.
Mounier, E. (1970). Personalism (P. Mairet, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Neville, M. G. (2008). Positive deviance on the ethical continuum: Green mountain coffee as a case study in conscientious capitalism. Business and Society Review, 113(4), 555–576.
O’Brien, T. (2009). Reconsidering the common good in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25–37.
Pelligra, V., & Ferrucci, A. (2004). Economia di comunione, una cultura nuova. Rome: Quaderni di Economia di Comunione.
Peters, T. (1992). Liberation management: Necessary disorganization for thenanosecond nineties. New York: Random House.
Pontifical Commission of Justice and Peace. (2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice.
Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5(2), 122–140.
Sandelands, L. (2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 93–101.
Schlag, M. (2012). The encyclical Caritas in Veritate, Christian tradition and the modern world. In M. Schlag & J. A. Mercado (Eds.), Free markets and the culture of the common good (pp. 93–109). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sisodia, R. (2011). Conscious capitalism, a better way to win: A response to James O’Toole and David Vogel’s ‘Two and a half cheers for conscious capitalism’. California Management Review, 53(3), 98–108.
Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D. B., & Sheth, J. N. (2011). Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sison, A. J. G. (2007). Toward a common good theory of the firm: The Tasubinsa case. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 471–480.
Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.
Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Participating in the common good of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 611–625.
Spitzeck, H. (2011). An integrated model of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 51–62.
Weil, S. (1952a). Gravity and grace. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Weil, S. (1952b). The need for roots. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions. We also thank Anouk Grevin and Luigino Bruni, members of GRACE, and Julie Bayle-Cordier for their expertise in this research area. The article also benefitted from feedback when first presented at the 4th International Colloquium on Christian Humanism in Economics and Business, Barcelona, April 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frémeaux, S., Michelson, G. The Common Good of the Firm and Humanistic Management: Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion. J Bus Ethics 145, 701–709 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3118-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3118-6