Sex Differences Through a Neuroscience Lens: Implications for Business Ethics
- 1.1k Downloads
Recent, groundbreaking work in neuroscience has illuminated sex differences that could have a profound impact on business organizations. Distinctions between the sexes that may have previously been presumed to be due to “nurture” may now also be demonstrably related to “nature.” Here, we report recent neuroscience findings related to males’ and females’ brain structures and brain chemistry, along with the results of recent neuroeconomic studies. We learn not only that male and female brains are structured differently, but also that different portions of their brains are used for the same tasks, often leading to identical conclusions. Neuroeconomic studies also demonstrate that the effects of hormones—most notably, oxytocin and testosterone—urge males and females to both think and behave differently in ethical situations. We suggest that examination of these new results could benefit six areas of business ethics research: trust, moral decision-making, organizational justice, moral development, the ethic of care, and female management styles. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for business practice, suggesting that it may be ethical to allow men and women to be treated differently in the workplace: such treatment may be advantageous not only for the workers’ firms, but also for the workers themselves.
KeywordsNeuroscience Neuroeconomics Brain Gender Trust Moral decision-making
- Cahill, L. (2014). Equal ≠ the same: Sex differences in the human brain. Cerebrum. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087190/.
- Dulebohn, J. H., Conlon, D. E., Sarinopoulos, I., Davison, R. B., & McNamara, G. (2009). The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Durante, K. M., & Saad, G. (2010). Ovulatory shifts in women’s social motives and behaviors: Implications for corporate organizations. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day, & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm (pp. 116–130). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85, 2–11.Google Scholar
- EEOC. (2012). Sex-based discrimination. December 12: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sex.cfm.
- Frantz, R. (2005). Two minds. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. (2008). Why Mars and Venus collide. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Haederle, M. (2010). The best fiscal stimulus: Trust. Miller-McCune, 3, 42–49.Google Scholar
- Hill, C. A., & O’Hara, E. A. (2006). A cognitive theory of trust. Washington University Law Review, 84, 1717–1796.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.Google Scholar
- PewResearchCenter. (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/10/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf.
- Reuter, M., Montag, C., Altmann, S., Bendlow, F., Elger, C., Kirsch, P., et al. (2009). Genetically determined differences in human trust behavior: The role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Paper presented at the NeuroPsychoEconomics conference, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748.Google Scholar
- Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of Ebay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34, 397–428.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 178.Google Scholar