Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance and the triple bottom line sustainability performance through the lens of agency theory and stakeholder theory. We claim, in fact, that no single theory fully accounts for all the hypothesised relationships. We measure sustainability performance through manual content analysis on sustainability reports of the US-based companies. The study extends the existing literature by investigating the impact of selected corporate governance mechanisms on each dimension of sustainability performance, as defined by the GRI framework. Our approach allows to identify which governance mechanisms foster triple bottom line performance, also revealing that some mechanisms fit only specific dimension(s) of sustainability. The fact-based findings provide support for a new beginning in the theorising process in which the theories must try not only to provide rationale for the impact of corporate governance on sustainability, but also to explain which dimension of sustainability might be more affected. The most important implication for practitioners is the support for sustainability practices, which may be gained through implementation of particular corporate governance mechanisms. The findings contribute also to the improvement of the ongoing standard setting process, in particular as it concerns the in-depth revision of the economic dimension of sustainability carried out under the new GRI framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adawi, M., & Rwegasira, K. (2011). Corporate boards and voluntary implementation of best disclosure practices in emerging markets: Evidence from the UAE listed companies in the Middle East. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 8(3), 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418–431. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00515.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2009). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 7(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 187–216. doi:10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shammari, B., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 262–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. doi:10.1002/bse.1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448. doi:10.1108/00251740810863870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, C., Bozzolan, S., & Michelon, G. (2014). Environmental reporting: Transparency to stakeholders or stakeholder manipulation? An analysis of disclosure tone and the role of the board of directors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,. doi:10.1002/csr.1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arussi, A. S. A., Selamat, M. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2009). Determinants of financial and environmental disclosures through the internet by Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(1), 59–76. doi:10.1108/13217340910956513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babío Arcay, M. R., & Muiño Vázquez, M. F. (2005). Corporate characteristics, governance rules and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Spain. Advances in Accounting, 21, 299–331. doi:10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21013-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barako, D., & Brown, A. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309–324. doi:10.1007/s10997-008-9053-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buniamin, S., Alrazi, B., Johari, N. H., & Rahman, N. R. A. (2011). Corporate governance practices and environmental reporting of companies in Malaysia: Finding possibilities of double thumbs up. Journal Pengurusan, 32(2011), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: An empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(4), 361–370. doi:10.1108/14720701111159217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262–289. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304. doi:10.1108/00251741111163124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10. doi:10.1108/jbs.2003.28824eaf.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2000). Financial accounting theory. Sydney: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00301.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. doi:10.2308/accr.00000005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(4), 407–423. doi:10.1108/17439130910987558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century (The triple bottom line of 21st century). Capstone: Oxford.

  • Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. doi:10.2307/725104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodio, M. I., & Oba, V. C. (2012). Boards’ gender mix and extent of environmental responsibility information disclosure in Nigeria: An empirical study. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(14), 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 70–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. doi:10.1002/csr.1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2013-0446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannarakis, G. (2014a). Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569–590. doi:10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannarakis, G. (2014b). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393–416. doi:10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. (Vol. G3). Amsterdam.

  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. doi:10.1080/13518470802466121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00002-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349. doi:10.1111/1467-6281.00112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. doi:10.2307/1913827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. L., & Taylor, G. (2013). Corporate governance and different types of voluntary disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1), 4–29. doi:10.1108/01140581311318940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288. doi:10.1002/csr.154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htay, S. N. N., Rashid, H. M. A., Adnan, M. A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), 604–619. doi:10.1108/02686900710759406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (2011). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10(1), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ienciu, I.-A., Popa, I. E., & Ienciu, N. M. (2012). Environmental reporting and good practice of corporate governance: Petroleum industry case study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 961–967. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00258-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janggu, T., Darus, F., Zain, M. M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138–145. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics Social Institutions (Vol. 1, pp. 163–231, Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues): Springer

  • Jizi, M., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2014). Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371–403. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Frost, G., Loftus, J., & van der Laan, S. (2007). An empirical examination of the market returns and financial performance of entities engaged in sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/bse.511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182. doi:10.1506/car.25.4.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137–159. doi:10.1080/00014788.2008.9663326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review,. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583. doi:10.1080/09638180701507155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77. doi:10.2307/40687360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838–1846. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 99–107. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7(3), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendall, M., Sánchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201–223. doi:10.1108/eb028900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509. doi:10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Ghazali, N. A., & Weetman, P. (2006). Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 226–248. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215–233. doi:10.1002/csr.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo-Institutional Framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494. doi:10.1111/corg.12026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436. doi:10.1108/09513570210435898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orij, R. (2010). Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868–889. doi:10.1108/09513571011080162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. M., & Crampton, W. (2004). Legitimacy and the internet: An examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures. In Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 2, 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1991). America\’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2014). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–223. doi:10.1177/0007650310394642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163. doi:10.1108/14720701211214052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. Á., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 24–41. doi:10.1108/14720700510604670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A. K., & Akter, S. (2013). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure practices of financial non-financial sector companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226. doi:10.1108/17471110910964496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2501–2521. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 495–505. doi:10.1108/14720700910985034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2014). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villiers, C. D., Naiker, V., & Staden, C. (2009). Good corporate governance makes for good environmental performance. New Zealand: Dipersentasikan pada AFAANZ Conferense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913. doi:10.1002/smj.1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778. doi:10.1007/BF00872309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.1023/A:1021626024014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. (1999). Do stringent environmental regulations reduce the international competitiveness of environmentally sensitive goods? A Global Perspective. World Development, 27(7), 1215–1226. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00055-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazim Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, N., Rigoni, U. & Orij, R.P. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. J Bus Ethics 149, 411–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5

Keywords

Navigation