Skip to main content

Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance

Abstract

The study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance and the triple bottom line sustainability performance through the lens of agency theory and stakeholder theory. We claim, in fact, that no single theory fully accounts for all the hypothesised relationships. We measure sustainability performance through manual content analysis on sustainability reports of the US-based companies. The study extends the existing literature by investigating the impact of selected corporate governance mechanisms on each dimension of sustainability performance, as defined by the GRI framework. Our approach allows to identify which governance mechanisms foster triple bottom line performance, also revealing that some mechanisms fit only specific dimension(s) of sustainability. The fact-based findings provide support for a new beginning in the theorising process in which the theories must try not only to provide rationale for the impact of corporate governance on sustainability, but also to explain which dimension of sustainability might be more affected. The most important implication for practitioners is the support for sustainability practices, which may be gained through implementation of particular corporate governance mechanisms. The findings contribute also to the improvement of the ongoing standard setting process, in particular as it concerns the in-depth revision of the economic dimension of sustainability carried out under the new GRI framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adawi, M., & Rwegasira, K. (2011). Corporate boards and voluntary implementation of best disclosure practices in emerging markets: Evidence from the UAE listed companies in the Middle East. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 8(3), 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418–431. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00515.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2009). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 7(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 187–216. doi:10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Shammari, B., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 262–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. doi:10.1002/bse.1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448. doi:10.1108/00251740810863870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arena, C., Bozzolan, S., & Michelon, G. (2014). Environmental reporting: Transparency to stakeholders or stakeholder manipulation? An analysis of disclosure tone and the role of the board of directors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,. doi:10.1002/csr.1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arussi, A. S. A., Selamat, M. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2009). Determinants of financial and environmental disclosures through the internet by Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(1), 59–76. doi:10.1108/13217340910956513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Babío Arcay, M. R., & Muiño Vázquez, M. F. (2005). Corporate characteristics, governance rules and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Spain. Advances in Accounting, 21, 299–331. doi:10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21013-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barako, D., & Brown, A. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309–324. doi:10.1007/s10997-008-9053-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buniamin, S., Alrazi, B., Johari, N. H., & Rahman, N. R. A. (2011). Corporate governance practices and environmental reporting of companies in Malaysia: Finding possibilities of double thumbs up. Journal Pengurusan, 32(2011), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: An empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(4), 361–370. doi:10.1108/14720701111159217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262–289. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304. doi:10.1108/00251741111163124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10. doi:10.1108/jbs.2003.28824eaf.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deegan, C. (2000). Financial accounting theory. Sydney: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00301.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. doi:10.2308/accr.00000005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(4), 407–423. doi:10.1108/17439130910987558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century (The triple bottom line of 21st century). Capstone: Oxford.

  29. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. doi:10.2307/725104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fodio, M. I., & Oba, V. C. (2012). Boards’ gender mix and extent of environmental responsibility information disclosure in Nigeria: An empirical study. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(14), 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 70–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. doi:10.1002/csr.1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2013-0446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Giannarakis, G. (2014a). Corporate governance and financial characteristic effects on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569–590. doi:10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giannarakis, G. (2014b). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393–416. doi:10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  44. GRI (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. (Vol. G3). Amsterdam.

  45. Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. doi:10.1080/13518470802466121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00002-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349. doi:10.1111/1467-6281.00112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. doi:10.2307/1913827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ho, P. L., & Taylor, G. (2013). Corporate governance and different types of voluntary disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1), 4–29. doi:10.1108/01140581311318940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288. doi:10.1002/csr.154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Htay, S. N. N., Rashid, H. M. A., Adnan, M. A., & Meera, A. K. M. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on social and environmental information disclosure of Malaysian listed banks: Panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), 604–619. doi:10.1108/02686900710759406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (2011). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10(1), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ienciu, I.-A., Popa, I. E., & Ienciu, N. M. (2012). Environmental reporting and good practice of corporate governance: Petroleum industry case study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 961–967. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00258-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Janggu, T., Darus, F., Zain, M. M., & Sawani, Y. (2014). Does good corporate governance lead to better sustainability reporting? An analysis using structural equation modeling. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 138–145. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics Social Institutions (Vol. 1, pp. 163–231, Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues): Springer

  63. Jizi, M., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2014). Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371–403. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jones, S., Frost, G., Loftus, J., & van der Laan, S. (2007). An empirical examination of the market returns and financial performance of entities engaged in sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453–486. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/bse.511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182. doi:10.1506/car.25.4.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137–159. doi:10.1080/00014788.2008.9663326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review,. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583. doi:10.1080/09638180701507155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77. doi:10.2307/40687360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838–1846. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 99–107. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Mallin, C., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7(3), 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. McKendall, M., Sánchez, C., & Sicilian, P. (1999). Corporate governance and corporate illegality: The effects of board structure on environmental violations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(3), 201–223. doi:10.1108/eb028900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509. doi:10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mohd Ghazali, N. A., & Weetman, P. (2006). Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 226–248. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215–233. doi:10.1002/csr.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo-Institutional Framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494. doi:10.1111/corg.12026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436. doi:10.1108/09513570210435898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Orij, R. (2010). Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868–889. doi:10.1108/09513571011080162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Patten, D. M., & Crampton, W. (2004). Legitimacy and the internet: An examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures. In Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 2, 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Porter, M. (1991). America\’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2014). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–223. doi:10.1177/0007650310394642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163. doi:10.1108/14720701211214052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. Á., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 24–41. doi:10.1108/14720700510604670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Saha, A. K., & Akter, S. (2013). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure practices of financial non-financial sector companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226. doi:10.1108/17471110910964496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2501–2521. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(4), 495–505. doi:10.1108/14720700910985034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2014). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Villiers, C. D., Naiker, V., & Staden, C. (2009). Good corporate governance makes for good environmental performance. New Zealand: Dipersentasikan pada AFAANZ Conferense.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913. doi:10.1002/smj.1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778. doi:10.1007/BF00872309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Williams, R. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10. doi:10.1023/A:1021626024014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Xu, X. (1999). Do stringent environmental regulations reduce the international competitiveness of environmentally sensitive goods? A Global Perspective. World Development, 27(7), 1215–1226. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00055-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazim Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, N., Rigoni, U. & Orij, R.P. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. J Bus Ethics 149, 411–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Corporate Governance
  • Board independence
  • Sustainability performance
  • Agency theory
  • Stakeholder theory