The gendered marketing of children’s toys is under considerable scrutiny, as reflected by numerous consumer-led campaigns and vigorous media debates. This article seeks to assist stakeholders to better understand the ethical and scientific assumptions that underlie the two opposing positions in this debate, and assess their relative strength. There is apparent consensus in the underlying ethical foundations of the debate, with all commentators seeming to endorse the values of corporate social responsibility and gender equality. However, the debate splits over three critical points of empirical disagreement: whether gendered toy marketing influences children’s toy preferences or simply reflects boys’ and girls’ fundamentally different interests; whether the effects of gendered toy marketing are negative, neutral or beneficial; and whether a shift to gender-neutral marketing would be economically viable. We assess the three points of disagreement against the available evidence and shared ethical principles underlying the debate, and conclude that current defences of gendered toy marketing fail.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
United Nations. 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ (accessed 9 April, 2014).
http://www.unicef.org/malaysia/1959-Declaration-of-the-Rights-of-the-Child.pdf. Accessed on 8 September 2014.
Ah-King, M. (2009). Toy story: En vetenskaplig kritik av forskningom apors leksakspreferenser. Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, 1, 45–63.
Alexander, G., & Wilcox, T. (2012). Sex differences in early infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 400–406.
Arthur, A., Bigler, R., Liben, L., Gelman, S., & Ruble, D. (2008). Gender stereotyping and prejudice in young children: A developmental intergroup perspective. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 66–86). Oxford: OUP.
Auster, C., & Mansbach, C. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the Disney store website. Sex Roles, 67(7–8), 375–388.
Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood. UK: Department for Education.
Bakir, A., Blodgett, J. G., & Rose, G. M. (2008). Children’s responses to gender-role stereotyped advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, 48, 255–266.
BBC News. (2014, February 6). Aiming toys at just boys or girls hurts economy—minister. BBC News. Retrieved from, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-26064302.
Bem, S. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 8, 598–616.
Berenbaum, S., & Resnick, S. (2007). The seeds of career choices: Prenatal sex hormone effects on psychology sex differences. In S. Ceci & C. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 147–157). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bigler, R. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children’s gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072–1087.
Bigler, R., & Liben, L. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 162–166.
Blakemore, J., & Centers, R. (2005). Characteristics of boys’ and girls’ toys. Sex Roles, 53(9/10), 619–633.
Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2012). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 542–555.
Bradbard, M. R., & Endsley, R. C. (1983). The effects of sex-typed labeling on preschool children’s information-seeking and retention. Sex Roles, 9(2), 247–260.
Bradbard, M. R., Martin, C. L., Endsley, R. C., & Halverson, C. F. (1986). Influence of sex stereotypes on children’s exploration and memory: A competence versus performance distinction. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 481–486.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.
Cárdenas, J.-C., Dreber, A., von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2012). Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: Comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 11–23.
Chatard, A., Guimond, S., & Selimbegovic, L. (2007). “How good are you in math?” The effect of gender stereotypes on students’ recollection of their school marks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 1017–1024.
Cherney, I. D., Kelly-Vance, L., Gill Glover, K., Ruane, A., & Oliver Ryalls, B. (2003). The effects of stereotyped toys and gender on play assessment in children aged 18-47 months. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 95–106.
Clifford, C. (2014, December 4). GoldieBox CEO: How I went from kickstarter to the Macy’s Day parade in two years. Entrepreneur.com. Retrieved from, http://www.entrepreneur.com/video/240370.
Colarelli, S., & Dettman, J. (2003). Intuitive evolutionary perspectives in marketing practices. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 837–865.
Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2000). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior & Development, 23, 113–118.
Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.
Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113.
Crane, A., & Kazmi, B. A. (2010). Business and children: Mapping impacts, managing responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 567–586.
Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). The colour of gender stereotyping. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 598–614.
Davies, P., Spencer, S., Quinn, D., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628.
Davies, P., Spencer, S., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287.
Dearden, L. (2014, December 2). Tony Abbott says campaigners against gendered toys should ‘let boys be boys and girls be girls’. The Independent. Retrieved from, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/tony-abbott-says-campaigners-against-gendered-toys-should-let-boys-be-boys-and-girls-be-girls-9897135.html.
Dreber, A., von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2011). Outrunning the gender gap—boys and girls compete equally. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 567–582.
Dreber, A., von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experimental Economics, 17(1), 154–172.
Dupré, J. (2003). Darwin’s legacy: What evolution means today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dupré, J. (forthcoming). A postgenomic perspective on sex and gender. In D. Livingstone Smith (Ed.), How biology shapes philosophy: New foundations for naturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, A. (2014, May 22). Try telling my little girl it’s sexist to love pink! Irish Daily Mail, p. 38.
Escudero, P., Robbins, R. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Sex-related preferences for real and doll faces versus real and toy objects in young infants and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 367–379.
Fabes, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1998) Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children’s and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Manuscript partially published in, Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child development (5th ed.) (Eisenberg, N. (Ed.) Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3). Retrieved from, http://www.public.asu.edu/~sparky00/fabes/meta.pdf).
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: WW Norton.
Fine, C. (2014, March 31). Biology doesn’t justify gender divide for toys. New Scientist, 222, 28–29.
Fine, C. (2015). Neuroscience, gender and “development to” and from”: The example of toy preferences. In J. Clausen & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of neuroethics (pp. 1737–1755). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Fine, C., & Duke, R. (2015). Expanding the role of gender essentialism in the single-sex education debate: A commentary on Liben. Sex Roles, 72, 427–433.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 713–728.
Griffiths, P. E. (2002). What is innateness? The Monist, 85(1), 70–85.
Griner, D., & Ciambriello, R. (2015, January 29). Hugely popular ‘like a girl’ campaign from always will return as a Super Bowl Ad. P&G brand says video has a lasting impact on girls and boys alike. Adweek. Retrieved from, http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/hugely-popular-girl-campaign-always-will-return-sunday-super-bowl-ad-162619.
Grossi, G., & Fine, C. (2012). The role of fetal testosterone in the development of “the essential difference” between the sexes: Some essential issues. In R. Bluhm, A. Jacobson, & H. Maibom (Eds.), Neurofeminism: Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 73–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gupta, V. K., & Bhawe, N. M. (2007). The influence of proactive personality and stereotype threat on women’s entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 73–85.
Halim, M., Ruble, D., & Amodio, D. (2011). From pink frilly dresses to ‘one of the boys’: A social-cognitive analysis of gender identity development and gender bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 933–949.
Halim, M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., Lurye, L. E., & Greulich, F. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly”: Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1091–1101.
Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: Comment on Dar-Nimrod & Heine (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 819–824.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.
Haslam, N., & Whelan, J. (2008). Human natures: Psychological essentialism in thinking about differences between people. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1297–1312.
Heilman, M. E., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2010). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. Advances in Group Processes, 24, 47–77.
Hilliard, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children’s gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81(6), 1787–1798.
Hines, M. (2010). Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 448–456.
Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88.
Hines, M. (2013, July 12). There’s no good reason to push pink toys on girls. The Conversation. Retrieved from, http://theconversation.com/theres-no-good-reason-to-push-pink-toys-on-girls-15830.
Hines, M., Pasterski, V., Spencer, D., Neufeld, S., Patalay, P., Hindmarsh, P. C., et al. (2016). Prenatal androgen exposure alters girls' responses to information indicating gender-appropriate behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0125.
Hoff Sommers, C. (2012, December 6). You can give a boy a doll, but you can’t make him play with it. The Atlantic. Retrieved from, http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/you-can-give-a-boy-a-doll-but-you-cant-make-him-play-with-it/265977/.
Holehouse, M. (2014, June 28). No gender divisions in toy stores: U.K. minister; No blue, no pink. National Post, p. A2.
Hyde, J. (1984). How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 722–736.
Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
Ireland, J. (2014, December 2). ‘No gender December’: Greens senator calls for end to gender-based toys. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from, http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/no-gender-december-greens-senator-calls-for-end-to-genderbased-toys-20141202-11y4ro.html.
Ireland, J. (2015, November 25). Greens get Senate inquiry to look into link between Barbies, toys and domestic violence. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from, http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/greens-link-barbies-trucks-and-childhood-toys-to-domestic-violence-in-call-for-gender-inquiry-20151124-gl716h.html.
Jadva, V., Hines, M., & Golombok, S. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1261–1273.
Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15(4), 496–505.
Joel, D. (2012). Genetic-gonadal-genitals sex (3G-sex) and the misconception of brain and gender, or, why 3G-males and 3G-females have intersex brain and intersex gender. Biology of Sex Differences, 3(1), 27.
Joel, D. (2014). Sex, gender, and brain: A problem of conceptualization. In S. Schmitz & G. Höppner (Eds.), Gendered neurocultures: Feminist and queer perspectives on current brain discourses (pp. 169–186). Zaglossus: University of Vienna.
Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., et al. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50): 15468–15473.
Johnson, F., & Young, K. (2002). Gendered voices in children’s television advertising. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(4), 461–480.
Jordan-Young, R. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jordan-Young, R. (2012). Hormones, context, and “Brain Gender”: A review of evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1738–1744.
Kahlenberg, S., & Hein, M. (2010). Progression on Nickelodeon? Gender-role stereotypes in toy commercials. Sex Roles, 62(11–12), 830–847.
Kane, E. W. (2012). The gender trap: Parents and the pitfalls of raising boys and girls. New York and London: New York University Press.
Kennett, J. (2011). Science and normative authority. Philosophical Explorations, 14(3), 229–235.
Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522–544.
Lamminmäki, A., Hines, M., Kuiri-Hänninen, T., Kilpeläinen, L., Dunkel, L., & Sankilampi, U. (2012). Testosterone measured in infancy predicts subsequent sex-typed behavior in boys and in girls. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 611–616.
Let Toys Be Toys (2014, August 9). Toy crazes. Retrieved from, http://www.lettoysbetoys.org.uk/toy-craze/.
Liben, L. (2015). Probability values and human values in evaluating single-sex education. Sex Roles, 72, 401–426.
LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2011). Pretty in pink: The early development of gender-stereotyped colour preferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 656–667.
Lowther, M., & Bandtock, N. (2013). Boys will be boys… or will they? Toys ‘n Playthings, June, 34–35.
Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. (1995). Children’s gender-based reasoning about toys. Child Development, 66(5), 1453–1471.
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70.
Master, A., Markman, E. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Thinking in categories or along a continuum: Consequences for children’s social judgments. Child Development, 83(4), 1145–1163.
Masters, J., Ford, M., Arend, R., Grotevant, H., & Clark, L. (1979). Modeling and labeling as integrated determinants of children’s sex-typed imitative behavior. Child Development, 50, 364–371.
Masunaga, S. (2015, August 10). Target plays catch-up in removing gender-based toy labels. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from, http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-target-gender-labeling-20150810-story.html.
Mesure, S. (2012, December 9). Toys story! The battle of the sexes. The Independent. Retrieved from, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/toys-story-the-battle-of-the-sexes-8395996.html.
Metz, I., & Kulik, C. (2014). The rocky climb: Women’s advancement in management. In S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R. Burke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 175–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meynell, L. (2008). The power and promise of developmental systems theory. Les Ateliers de L’Éthique, 3(2), 88–103.
Meynell, L. (2012). Evolutionary psychology, ethology, and essentialism (because what they don’t know can hurt us). Hypatia, 27(1), 3–27.
Midgley, C. (2014, September 8). Don’t paint your daughter’s room pink (like I did); Marketers want us to buy into a myth of ‘girlie’ colours, toys, even dreams. The Times, 4–5.
Miller, C., Trautner, H., & Ruble, D. (2006). The role of gender stereotypes in children’s preferences and behavior. In L. Balter & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (2nd ed., pp. 293–323). New York: Psychology Press.
Morrison, S. (2014, September 8). Gender-specific children’s books ‘are easier to sell’, insists children’s book publisher. The Independent. Retrieved from, http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/genderspecific-childrens-books-are-easier-to-sell-insists-childrens-book-publisher-9185067.html.
Moseley, A. (2016). Political philosophy: Methodology. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), The internet encylopedia of philosophy. Martin, TN: The University of Tennessee.
Nash, A., & Grossi, G. (2007). Picking Barbie’s brain: Inherent sex differences in scientific ability? Journal of Interdisciplinary Feminist Thought, 2(1), Article 5.
Nelson, J. (2011). Economics for humans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
New York Times (2014, December 22). Why should toys come in pink and blue? Retrieved from, http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/12/22/why-should-toys-come-in-pink-and-blue?.
O’Brien, M., & Nagle, K. J. (1987). Parents’ speech to toddlers: The effect of play context. Journal of Child Language, 14(02), 269–279.
Okimoto, T., & Brescoll, V. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936.
Olson, E. (2015, January 15). How corporate America is tackling unconscious bias. Fortune. Retrieved from, https://fortune.com/2015/01/15/how-corporate-america-is-tackling-unconscious-bias/.
Orenstein, P. (2011, December 29). Should the world of toys be gender-free? New York Times. Retrieved from, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/30/opinion/does-stripping-gender-from-toys-really-make-sense.html?_r=0.
Paton, G. (2014, January 16). Gender specific toys ‘put girls off’ maths and science, says Education Minister. The Telegraph. Retrieved from, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10578106/Gender-specific-toys-put-girls-off-maths-and-science.html.
Patterson, M., & Bigler, R. (2006). Preschool children’s attention to environmental messages about groups: Social categorization and the origins of intergroup bias. Child Development, 77(4), 847–860.
Phelan, J., Moss-Rascusin, C., & Rudman, L. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psycholgy of Women Quarterly, 32, 406–413.
Pike, J., & Jennings, N. (2005). The effects of commercials on children’s perceptions of gender appropriate toy use. Sex Roles, 52(1/2), 83–91.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281.
Radford, B. (2011, December 29). The four-year-old feminist sensation—some questions, 2011. Retrieved from, http://news.discovery.com/human/psychology/riley-four-year-old-feminist-111229.htm.
Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin & K. E. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1004–1010.
Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762.
Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: The Guilford Press.
Rudman, L., Phelan, J., Moss-Rascusin, C., & Nauts, S. (2009). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice toward female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179.
Saad, G. (2007). The evolutionary bases of consumption. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028.
Serbin, L., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K., Sen, M., & Eichstedt, J. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(1), 7–15.
Serbin, L., Zelkowitz, P., Doyle, A., & Gold, D. (1990). The socialization of sex-differentiated skills and academic performance: A mediational model. Sex Roles, 23(11/12), 613–628.
Servin, A., Bohlin, G., Nordenstrom, A., & Larsson, A. (2003). Prenatal androgens and gender-typed behavior: A study of girls with mild and severe forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 440–450.
Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13(4), 599–610.
Smithers, R. (2013, December 18). Marks & Spencer agrees to gender-neutral toy packaging. Retrieved from, http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/dec/17/marks-and-spencer-gender-neutral-toys.
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 624–635.
Sweet, E. V. (2013). Boy builders and pink princesses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis, CA .
Sweet, E. V. (2014, December 22). How did toys get stereotyped by sex? New York Times. Retrieved from, http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/12/22/why-should-toys-come-in-pink-and-blue/how-did-toys-get-stereotyped-by-sex.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
The Marketing Society Forum. (2014, March 7). Should all marketing to children be gender-neutral? Campaign. Retrieved from, http://m.campaignlive.co.uk/article/1283685/marketing-children-gender-neutral.
Thompson, S. (1975). Gender labels and early sex role development. Child Development, 43(2), 339–347.
Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117(2), 601–622.
Trawick-Smith, J., Russell, H., & Swaminathan, S. (2011). Measuring the effects of toys on the problem-solving, creative and social behaviours of preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 181(7), 909–927.
Valian, V. (2014). Interests, gender, and science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2): 225–230.
van de Beek, C., Thijssen, J. H. H., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., van Goozen, S. H. M., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2004). Relationships between sex hormones assessed in amniotic fluid, and maternal and umbilical cord serum: What is the best source of information to investigate the effects of fetal hormonal exposure? Hormones and Behavior, 46(5), 663–669.
Ward, A. (2014, September 5). Toymakers aim to inspire next generation of women engineers. Retrieved from, http://www.dailyfinance.com/2014/09/05/roominate-toymakers-inspire-girls-engineering-stem-careers/#!slide=2869928.
Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., & Dinella, L. M. (2014). Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children’s toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 401–409.
Wilson, D. S., Dietrich, E., & Clark, A. B. (2003). On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biology and Philosophy, 18(5), 669–681.
Wittenberg-Cox, A. (2014, September 15). LEGO’s girl problem starts with management. Harvard Business Review Blog Network. Retrieved from, http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/09/legos-girl-problem-starts-with-management/.
Wolf, T. M. (1973). Effects of live modeled sex-inappropriate play behavior in a naturalistic setting. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 120–123.
Wong, W., & Hines, M. (2015). Effects of gender color-coding on toddlers’ gender-typical toy play. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1233–1242.
Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70(1), 10–20.
Zosuls, K., Ruble, D. N., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2014). Self-socialization of gender in African American, Dominican immigrant, and Mexican immigrant toddlers. Child Development, 85(6), 2202–2217.
Zosuls, K., Ruble, D., Tamis-LeMonda, C., Shrout, P., Bornstein, M., & Greulich, F. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 688–701.
Cordelia Fine was supported by Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT110100658 during the preparation of this work. The authors thank Emma Rush's colleagues at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics and at the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, and Cordelia Fine's colleagues at the Melbourne Business School, for their feedback on earlier drafts of this work. The authors additionally thank Rebecca Bigler and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
About this article
Cite this article
Fine, C., Rush, E. “Why Does all the Girls have to Buy Pink Stuff?” The Ethics and Science of the Gendered Toy Marketing Debate. J Bus Ethics 149, 769–784 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3080-3
- Gender stereotypes
- Corporate social responsibility