Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation

  • Dirk De Clercq
  • Narongsak Thongpapanl
  • Maxim Voronov
Article
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing from research on strategic choice, this study investigates the relationship between market turbulence and firms’ sustainable behavior, in the context of sustainability-related institutional adversity. It argues that the relationship between market turbulence and sustainability is mediated by network embeddedness, and this mediating role in turn is moderated by a firm’s innovative orientation. Data collected from a sample of Ontario restaurants inform predictions about firms’ propensity to adopt local wines in their portfolios, despite the limited market and normative support that these wines receive compared with imported wines. The study shows that market turbulence enhances sustainable firm behavior, through the development of strong network relationships. Furthermore, the mediating effect of network embeddedness is particularly salient among firms that exhibit a stronger innovative orientation. These findings reveal how and when turbulent market conditions can contribute to a firm’s sustainable behaviors in the presence of limited institutional support for such behaviors.

Keywords

Sustainability Market turbulence Network embeddedness Innovative orientation Strategic choice 

References

  1. Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Albareda, L., Lozano, J., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, A. R. (1998). Cultivating the Garden of Eden: Environmental entrepreneuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing, 51, 71–86.Google Scholar
  7. Aspler, T. (2006). The wine atlas of Canada. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). The influence of top management team functional diversity on strategic orientations: The moderating role of environmental turbulence and inter-functional coordination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balaji, M. S. (2014). Managing customer citizenship behavior: A relationship perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(3), 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanations for ISO 14001 adoption. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartl, M., Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., & Ernst, H. (2012). A manager’s perspective on virtual customer integration for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 1031–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borland, H., & Lindgreen, A. (2013). Sustainability, epistemology, ecocentric business, and marketing strategy: Ideology, reality, and vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (2000). Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, J. W., & Utterback, J. M. (1985). Uncertainty and technical communication patterns. Management Science, 31(3), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Calantone, R., & Schatzel, K. (2000). Strategic foretelling: Communication-based antecedents of a firm’s propensity to preannounce. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Canadian Restaurant and Foodservice Association. (2013). Foodservice operations report. Toronto, ON: The Canadian Restaurant and Foodservice Association.Google Scholar
  24. Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009). Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organization Science, 20(2), 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chabowski, B. R., & Mena, J. A. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chakravarthy, B. (1997). A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Review, 38(2), 69–82.Google Scholar
  27. Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Colby, M. E. (1991). Environmental management in development. The evolution of paradigms. Ecological Economics, 3(3), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resources practices and top management team social networks: An examination of the role of HR practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J, Jr, & Slater, S. (2011). Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cronin, J, Jr, Smith, J. S., Gleim, M. R., Ramirez, E., & Martinez, J. D. (2011). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cui, A. S., Griffith, D. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2005). The influence of competitive intensity and market dynamism on knowledge management capabilities of multinational corporation subsidiaries. Journal of International Marketing, 13(3), 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2015a). Structural and relational interdependence and entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs: The mediating role of internal knowledge sharing. International Small Business Journal, 33(5), 514–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Voronov, M. (2015b). Explaining SME engagement in local sourcing: The roles of location-specific resources and patriotism. International Small Business Journal, 33(8), 929–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2011). Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logics. International Small Business Journal, 29(4), 322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dean, T., & McMullen, J. (2007). Towards a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 50–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Del Baldo, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: The experience of some “spirited business”. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Du, S., & Vieira, E. T, Jr. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility. Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.Google Scholar
  47. Eastlick, M. A., & Lotz, S. L. (1999). Profiling potential adopters and non-adopters of an interactive electronic shopping medium. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fang, T., Gunterberg, C., & Larsson, E. (2010). Sourcing in an increasingly expensive China: Four Swedish cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fraj-Andrés, E., Martinez-Salinas, E., & Matute-Vallejo, J. (2009). A multidimensional approach to the influence of environmental marketing and orientation on the firm’s organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Frazier, B. J., & Huddleston, P. (2009). The role of market embeddedness in market scanning and marketing competence. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Gabrielsson, P., Gabrielsson, M., & Seppälä, T. (2012). Marketing strategies for foreign expansion of companies originating in small and open economies: The consequences of strategic fit and performance. Journal of International Marketing, 20(2), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Giuliani, E. (2013). Clusters, networks, and firms’ product success: An empirical study. Management Decision, 51(6), 1135–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Goldsmith, R. E., Hauteville, F., & Flynn, L. R. (1998). Theory and measurement of consumer innovativeness: A transnational evaluation. European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 340–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Grewal, R., Chandrashekaran, M., Johnson, J. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2013). Environments, unobserved heterogeneity, and the effect of market orientation on outcomes for high-tech firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 206–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66, 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harrington, R. (2001). Environmental uncertainty within the hospitality industry: Exploring the measure of dynamism and complexity between restaurant segments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 25, 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: Some theory and implications. Economic Journal, 105(430), 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hoffman, A. J., Gillespie, J. J., Moore, D. A., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1999). A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hoffman, A. J., & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization and Environment, 21, 390–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hoffman, A. J., Riley, H. C., Troast, J. G, Jr, & Bazerman, M. X. (2002). Cognitive and institutional barriers to new forms of cooperation on environmental protection. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 820–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: Market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Arrfelt, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1035–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2002). A longitudinal study of the learning climate and cycle time in supply chains. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Husted, B. W. (1994). Transaction costs, norms, and social networks: A preliminary study of cooperation in industrial buyer–seller relationships in the United States and Mexico. Business and Society, 33(1), 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015–1052.Google Scholar
  75. Jermier, J. M., Forbes, L. C., Benn, S., & Orsato, R. J. (2006). The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 618–650). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Johnson, R. L. (2009). Organizational motivations for going green or profitability versus sustainability. Business Review, 13(1), 22–28.Google Scholar
  77. Joshi, A. W., & Campbell, A. J. (2003). Effect of environmental dynamism on relational governance in manufacturer-supplier relationships: A contingency framework and an empirical test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kim, W. G., Zhong, J., Chen, M.-H., & Karadag, E. (2009). Risk-adjusted performance of three restaurant segments in the USA. Tourism Economics, 15(1), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.Google Scholar
  80. Knight, G., & Cavusgil, T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lahdesmaki, M., & Suutari, T. (2012). Keeping at arm’s length or searching for social proximity? Corporate social responsibility as a reciprocal process between small businesses and the local community. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Mullins, R., & Hayati, B. (2013). Exploring the dynamics of antecedents to consumer-brand identification with a new brand. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lane, P. J., & Lubaktin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lapierre, J., Tran-Khanh, A., & Skelling, J. (2008). Antecedents of customers’ desired value change in a business-to business context: Theoretical model and empirical assessment. Services Marketing Quarterly, 29(3), 114–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lattin, J., Carroll, D., & Green, P. E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Learning Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  87. Lee, R. P. (2010). Extending the environment-strategy-performance framework: The roles of multinational corporation network strength, market responsiveness, and product innovation. Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lee, J., & Qualls, W. J. (2010). A dynamic process of buyer-seller technology adoption. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(3), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Leenders, R. T. A. J., van Engelen, J. M. L., & Kratzer, J. (2007). Systematic design methods and the creative performance of new product teams: Do they contradict or compliment each other? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). Greening the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraints adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  95. Luo, Y. (2011). Strategic responses to perceived corruption in an emerging market: Lessons from MNEs investing in China. Business and Society, 50(2), 350–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Luo, Y., & Park, S. H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lynn, M. L. (2005). Organizational buffering: Managing boundaries and cores. Organization Studies, 26(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: Concepts, evidence, and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Maltz, E., Menon, A., & Wilcox, J. B. (2006). The effects of flexible firm orientations on market information use: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Mariadoss, B. J., Tansuhaj, P. S., & Mouri, N. (2011). Marketing capabilities and innovation-based strategies for environmental sustainability: An exploratory investigation of B2B firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1305–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Markley, M. J., & Davis, L. (2007). Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(9), 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. McCarthy, I. P., Lawrence, T. B., Wixted, B., & Gordon, B. R. (2010). A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 604–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation—business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. National Restaurant Association. (2013). Restaurant industry operations report. Washington, DC: The National Restaurant Association and Deloitte & Touche LLP.Google Scholar
  109. Pallister, J., & Foxall, G. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Hurt–Joseph–Cook scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Technovation, 18(11), 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.Google Scholar
  115. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Ritzer, G. (2007). The globalization of nothing 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  118. Rodriguez, M. A., Ricart, J. E., & Sanchez, P. (2002). Sustainable development and the sustainability of competitive advantage: A dynamic and sustainable view of the firm. Creativity & Innovation Management, 11(3), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Roxas, B., & Coetzer, A. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(4), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, R., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 141–160). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  121. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  122. Sharma, A., Iyer, G. R., Mehrotra, A., & Krishnan, R. (2010). Sustainability and business-to-business marketing: A framework and applications. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.Google Scholar
  124. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  127. Song, X. M., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Zhao, Y. (2008). The antecedents and consequences of manufacturer-distributor cooperation: An empirical test in the U.S. and Japan. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Song, X. M., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Schmidt, J. B. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of high-technology ventures: The moderating role of intra- and extra-industry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Stock, R. M., Six, B., & Zacharias, N. A. (2013). Linking multiple layers of innovation-oriented corporate culture, product program innovativeness, and business performance: A contingency approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(3), 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Studenmund, A. H. (1992). Using econometrics: A practical guide. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  133. Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Kock, A. (2011). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 819–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Uhlaner, L. M., Berent-Braun, M. M., Jeurissen, R. J., & de Wit, G. (2012). Beyond size: Predicting engagement in environmental management practices of Dutch SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Uhlaner, L. M., van Stel, A., Duplat, V., & Zhou, H. (2013). Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 581–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49, 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(7), 795–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Voronov, M., De Clercq, D., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Conformity and distinctiveness in a global institutional framework: The legitimation of Ontario fine wine. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 607–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Voss, C. M., & Brettel, M. (2013). Conditions of departmental power: A strategy contingency exploration of marketing’s customer-connecting role. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(2), 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–52.Google Scholar
  143. Wang, T., & Bansal, P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1135–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zafeiropoulou, F. A., & Koufopoulos, D. N. (2013). The influence of relational embeddedness on the formation and performance of social franchising. Journal of Marketing Channels, 20(1–2), 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zahra, S. A., & Gerard, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  147. Zheng, Q., Luo, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2014). Moral degradation, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility in a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk De Clercq
    • 1
    • 2
  • Narongsak Thongpapanl
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maxim Voronov
    • 1
  1. 1.Goodman School of BusinessBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.Small Business Research Centre, Kingston UniversityKingston-Upon-ThamesUK
  3. 3.Research Administration Center, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations