Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 401–418 | Cite as

Bankers Bashing Back: Amoral CSR Justifications

  • Peter Norberg
Article

Abstract

The finance industry is required to respond to public criticism of perceived immoral behaviour. To create legitimacy, financial firms not only undertake corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, but also support such activities with precise justifications. In this paper, we study CSR justifications appearing in annual and sustainability reports from the Swedish finance industry. Our objective is to investigate the ethical character of CSR justifications in the finance industry. This is an interesting topic, both because CSR carries ethical meaning and because CSR justifications play a role in actual business activities. A secondary aim of this article is to test whether decoupled corporate claims about CSR can be recoupled, which would potentially help companies to act responsibly. The observed CSR justifications avoided the fundamental question of whether the finance industry does in fact have responsibilities, and they did not manifest awareness of stakeholders’ demands for CSR. Seemingly value-based CSR activities often lacked ethical justifications. These characteristics do not harmonize with the responsible image that the contemporary finance industry wants to portray. Our counterintuitive finding is that amorality prevails in the justifications that banks give for undertaking CSR activities.

Keywords

Amorality Justifications Criticism CSR Finance industry Legitimacy Taking responsibility Talking responsibility 

References

  1. Akrivou, K., & Bradbury-Huang, H. (2015). Educating integrated catalysts: Transforming business schools toward ethics and sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(2), 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexius, S., Furusten, S., & Löwenberg, L. (2013). Sustainable banking? The discursive repertoire in sustainability reports of banks in Sweden. In EGOS 2013, sub-theme 20: Sustainable development and financial markets: Connections, pitfalls and options.Google Scholar
  3. Alexius, S., & Löwenberg, L. (2013). Hållbar bankverksamhet. En studie av (den ihåliga) hållbarhetsdiskursen i den svenska banksektorn. In Score (Stockholms centrum för forskning om offentlig sektor), 1.Google Scholar
  4. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristoteles, (1912). Politik. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  6. Augustsson, A. (2015). Allt färre litar på mäklare (p. 22). VästraGötaland: Göteborgsposten.Google Scholar
  7. Avanza. (2006). Svenska Storkapitalföreningen. Retrieved from May 2, 2006 from http://svenskastorkapitalforeningen.se.
  8. Avanza Bank Holding AB (2013). Annual Report 2012. Stockholm: Avanza Bank Holding AB.Google Scholar
  9. Bacon, N., Wright, M., & Ball, R. (2013). Private equity, HRM, and employment. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baden, D., & Harwood, I. A. (2013). Terminology matters: A critical exploration of corporate social responsibility terms. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belfrage, C. (2008). Towards ‘universal financialisation’ in Sweden. Contemporary Politics, 14(3), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bevan, D., & Werhane, P. (2015). The inexorable sociality of commerce: The individual and others in Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique: Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Gallimard, Paris: NRF Essais.Google Scholar
  15. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (1991). De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  17. Brooks, D. (2000). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agency setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burt, R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Butterfield, H. (1931). The whig interpretation of history. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  21. Carnegie Holding AB (2008). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2007. Stockholm: Carnegie Holding AB.Google Scholar
  22. Carnegie Holding AB (2013). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: Carnegie Holding AB.Google Scholar
  23. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chapman, S. D. (1986). Aristocracy and meritocracy in merchant banking. British Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cock, C. D., & Nyberg, D. (2014). The possibility of critique under a financialized capitalism: The case of private equity in the United Kingdom. Organization, 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516(7529), 86–89.Google Scholar
  29. Collardi, B. F. J. (2012). Private banking: Building a culture of excellence. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crane, A. (2000). Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21(4), 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dagens Nyheter (2008, September 30) Borg: Girighet bakom krisen.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, S., Lukomnik, J., & Pitt-Watson, D. (2006). The new capitalists. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  33. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Du, X. (2015). Is corporate philanthropy used as environmental misconduct dressing? Evidence from Chinese family-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ekholm, N. (1996). S-E-Bankens nya strategi gav resultat. OM Omsatt, (2), 12–13.Google Scholar
  36. Endlich, L. (1999). Goldman sachs: The culture of success. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  37. Ernkvist, M. (2015). The double knot of technology and business-model innovation in the era of ferment of digital exchanges: The case of OM, a pioneer in electronic options exchanges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.001.Google Scholar
  38. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, E. R. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In G. D. Chryssides & J. H. Kaler (Eds.), An introduction to business ethics (pp. 75–93). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Finansdepartementet & Förtroendekommittén. (2004). Näringslivet och förtroendet. In Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU). Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar.Google Scholar
  41. Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and criticism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Folkman, P., Froud, J., & Williams, K. (2009). Private equity: Levered on capital or labour? Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(4), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility: Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Freeman, E. R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Friedman, M. ([1970] 1990). The social role of business is to increase its profits. In W. M. Hoffman & J. Mills Moore (Eds.), Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Frostenson, M. (2013). CSR travels into the organization. In M. Jutterström & P. Norberg (Eds.), CSR as a management idea—Ethics in action (pp. 126–140). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gadamer, H.-G. ([1960] 1975). Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  49. Gioia, D. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  51. Göthberg, P. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the Swedish financial services sector—Translating an idea into practice. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).Google Scholar
  52. Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hallvarsson & Halvarsson. (2004). Intressekonflikter hos fondkommissionärer. En intervjuundersökning av åsikter och attityder hos ledare av corporate finance, aktieanalys och mäkleri på den svenska marknaden 2003. In Förtroendekommittén (Ed.), Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU 2004:47) (pp. 245–303). Stockholm: Hallvarsson & Halvarsson.Google Scholar
  54. Hamilton, E. A. (2006). An exploration of the relationship between loss of legitimacy and the sudden death of organizations. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hammar, I. (2008, April 7). Sex, missbruk och våld på Carnegie. Realtid.se.Google Scholar
  56. Harrington, B. (2008). Pop finance: Investment clubs and the new investor populism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Heidegger, M. ([1927] 1977). Sein und Zeit. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  59. Hill, C. A., & Painter, R. (2012). The personal and professional responsibility of investment bankers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Law School.Google Scholar
  60. Holzer, B. (2010). Moralizing the corporation: Transnational activism and corporate accountability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. HQ. (2002, Feb 20). HQ.se Advertisement. Svenska Dagbladet.Google Scholar
  63. Igalens, J. (2007). L’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale à travers les rapports annuels de développement durable d’entreprises francaises. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 10(2), 129–155.Google Scholar
  64. Ihlen, Ø., & Roper, J. (2014). Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: ‘We have arrived’. Sustainable Development, 22, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Iser, W. (1970). Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  66. Iser, W. (1972). Der implizite Leser: Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
  67. Jauß, H. R. (1970). Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  68. Jenkins, A. (2014). Driving competitive advantage through values-based leadership. Ethics in Business Audio.Google Scholar
  69. Kantšukov, M., & Medvedskaja, D. (2013). ”From dishonesty to disaster: The reasons and consequences of rogue traders’ fraudulent behavior. In T. Vissak & M. Vadi (Eds.), (Dis)Honesty in management (pp. 147–165). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Katila, S., & Eriksson, P. (2013). He is a firm, strong-minded and empowering leader, but is she? Gendered positioning of female and male CEOs. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Koehn, D., & Ueng, J. (2010). Is philanthropy used by corporate wrongdoer to buy good will? Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kynaston, D. (2001). The city of London. Vol. 4, a club no more: 19452000. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  74. Kynaston, D. (2011). City of London: The history. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  75. Law on Securities Business. (1991). Swedish: Lag (1991:981) om värdepappersrörelse.Google Scholar
  76. Länsförsäkringar Bank. (2013). Länsförsäkringar Bank Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Sweden: Länsförsäkringar Bank.Google Scholar
  77. Le Goff, J. ([1986] 1990). Ockraren och döden: Ekonomi och religion på medeltiden. Ludvika: Zelos.Google Scholar
  78. Lindgren, H. (1991). Swedish historical research on banking during the 1980’s: Tradition and renewal. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 39(3), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lindstedt, G. (2013, August 20). Sexmissbruk är vanligt i finansbranschen. In Veckans Affärer.Google Scholar
  80. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Éd. de minuit.Google Scholar
  81. Mandrou, R. (1984). L’histoire des mentalités. In Encyclopaedia universalis, (pp. 366–368). Paris.Google Scholar
  82. McDowell, L. ([1997] 2011). Capital culture: Gender at work in the city. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  83. Merton, R. C. (1992). Financial innovation and economic performance. The Continental Bank. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4(4), 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nasdaq OMX Nordic. (2015). Members. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/omoss/Medlemmar.
  86. Nilsson, G. B. (1989). Gyllene tider 1856-1866. André Oscar Wallenberg (Vol. 2). Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
  87. Norberg, P. (2001). Finansmarknadens amoralitet och det kalvinska kyrkorummet: En studie i ekonomisk mentalitet och etik. Stockholm: Ekonomiska forskningsinstitutet vid Handelshögsk.Google Scholar
  88. Norberg, P. (2009). “I don’t care that people don’t like what I do”: Business codes viewed as invisible or visible restrictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nordea. (2009). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2008. Stockholm: Nordea.Google Scholar
  90. Nordea. (2012). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2011. Stockholm: Nordea.Google Scholar
  91. Nordea. (2013). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: Nordea.Google Scholar
  92. Nordnet. (2013). Nordnet Ansvarsrapport (Responsibility report) 2012. Stockholm: Nordea.Google Scholar
  93. Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived Greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Panwar, R., Paul, K., Nybakk, E., Hansen, E., & Thompson, D. (2014). The legitimacy of CSR actions of publicly traded companies versus family-owned companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Perks, K. J., Farache, F., Shukla, P., & Berry, A. (2013). Communicating responsibility-practicing irresponsibility in CSR advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1881–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pettersson, T. (2012a). Entreprenörskap och innovation inom det finansiella systemet. In T. Pettersson (Ed.), Pengamakarna (pp. 7–20). Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
  98. Pettersson, T. (2012b). Finansvalparnas möte med finansetablissemanget. Gabriel Urwitz, Mikael Kamras och Robert Weil. In T. Pettersson (Ed.), Pengamakarna (pp. 265–285). Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
  99. Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Prasad, A., & Holzinger, I. (2013). Seeing through smoke and mirrors: A critical analysis of marketing CSR. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1915–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Preda, A. (2005). Legitimacy and Status Groups in financial markets. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Reveley, J., & Singleton, J. (2013). Re-Storying Bankers: Historical antecedents of banker bashing in Britain and America. Management & Organizational History, 8(4), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ricoeur, P. (1965). De l’interprétation: essai sur Freud. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  104. Roulet, T. (2015). ‘What good is Wall Street?’ Institutional contradiction and the diffusion of the stigma over the finance industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 389–402. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2237-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rueede, D., & Kreutzer, K. (2015). Legitimation work within a cross-sector social partnership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Saleuddin, R. (2014). Reputation risk management in financial firms: Protecting (some) small investors. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 22(4), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Salz, A. (2013). The Salz review: An independent review of Barclays’ Business Practices. London: Barclays.Google Scholar
  108. Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2012). A trust crisis. International Review of Finance, 12(2), 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sartre, J.-P. ([1946] 1964). Existentialismen är en humanism. Aldus/Bonnier: Stockholm.Google Scholar
  110. Schleiermacher, F. (1838). Hermeneutik und Kritik. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
  111. Schramme, T. (2014a). Introduction. In T. Schramme (Ed.), Being amoral. Psychopathy and moral incapacity (pp. 1–39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schramme, T. (2014b). Being a (a-)moral person and caring about morality. In T. Schramme (Ed.), Being amoral. Psychopathy and moral incapacity (pp. 227–244). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Schultz, P. (2008, September 18). Blåsta av rövarkapitalister nu igen. In Veckans Affärer.Google Scholar
  114. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  115. SEB. (2007). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2006. Stockholm: SEB.Google Scholar
  116. SEB. (2012). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2011. Stockholm: SEB.Google Scholar
  117. SEB. (2013). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: SEB.Google Scholar
  118. SEB. (2015). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2014. Stockholm: SEB.Google Scholar
  119. SEB Private Banking. (2013). Välkommen! In Private Bankings podcast. Stockholm: SEB. Retrieved Jan 16, 2015 from http://seb.se/privat/private-banking/private-bankings-podcast.
  120. Skandiabanken Aktiebolag (publ) (2013). Skandiabanken Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: Skandiabanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  121. Skandiabanken Aktiebolag (publ) (2014). Skandiabanken Årsredovisning (annual report) 2013. Stockholm: Skandiabanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  122. Smith, A. ([1776] 1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  123. SOM-institutet. (2004). Förtroendet för näringslivet. In Finansdepartementet & Förtroendekommittén: SOM-institutet vid Göteborgs universitet (Ed.), Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU) (pp. 27–91).Google Scholar
  124. Soros, G. (1995). Soros on Soros: Staying ahead of the curve. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  125. Soros, G. (2000). Open Society: Reforming global capitalism. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  126. Stanley, L., Davey, K. M., & Symon, G. (2014). Exploring media construction of investment banking as dirty work. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 9(3), 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Stenfors, A. (2014). Libor as a Keynesian beauty contest: A process of endogenous deception. Review of Political Economy, 26(3), 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  129. SvD Näringsliv. (2014, May 16). Bankbonusar kan halveras. Stockholm: SvD Näringsliv.Google Scholar
  130. Svenska Dagbladet. (2013 March 1). Borg positiv till tak på bankbonusar.Google Scholar
  131. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2005).  Årsredovisning (annual report) 2004. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  132. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2008). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2007. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  133. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2009). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2008. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  134. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2010). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2009. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  135. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2011). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2010. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  136. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2012). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2011. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  137. Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ). (2013). Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: Svenska Handelsbanken Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  138. Svenskt Kvalitetsindex (2013). Svenskt Kvalitetsindex om bankerna (2013). Pressmeddelande.Google Scholar
  139. Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ). (2005). Swedbank Årsredovisning (annual report) 2004. Stockholm: Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  140. Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ). (2006). Swedbank Årsredovisning (annual report) 2005. Stockholm: Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  141. Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ). (2009). Swedbank Årsredovisning (annual report) 2008. Stockholm: Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  142. Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ). (2013). Swedbank Årsredovisning (annual report) 2012. Stockholm: Swedbank Aktiebolag (publ).Google Scholar
  143. Swedberg, R. (2004). Conflicts of interests in the U.S. Brokerage Industry. In K. Knorr Cetina & A. Preda (eds.), The sociology of financial markets (pp. 187–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  144. Thompson, P. (1997). The pyrrhic victory of gentlemanly capitalism: The financial elite of the city of London, 1945–90. Journal of Contemporary History, 32(3), 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Thrift, N. (2001). ‘It’s the romance, not the finance, that makes the business worth pursuing’: Disclosing a new market culture. Economy and Society, 30(4), 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Tonge, A., Greer, L., & Lawton, A. (2003). The enron story: You can fool some people some of the time. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Weber, O., Diaz, M., & Schwegler, R. (2014). Corporate social responsibility of the financial sector—Strengths, weaknesses and the impact on sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 22(5), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wouters, C. (2007). Informalization: Manners and emotions since 1890. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Organisational and Worklife EthicsErsta Sköndal University CollegeStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations