Business for Good? An Investigation into the Strategies Firms Use to Maximize the Impact of Financial Corporate Philanthropy on Employee Attitudes
- 934 Downloads
Most research on the corporate philanthropy of organizations has focused on the external benefits of such initiatives for firms, such as benefits for firm reputation and opportunities. However, many firms justify their giving, in part, due to the positive impact it has on their employees. Little is known about the effectiveness of such efforts, or how they can be managed strategically to maximize impact. We hypothesize a main effect of office-level corporate philanthropy on average employee attitudes in that office, but also investigate three strategies that offices may use to enhance this impact. Testing our hypotheses with 3 years of data on attitudes of an average of 14,577 employees in 53 offices we find support for the main effect, but mixed support for the specific strategies used to enhance impact.
KeywordsFinancial corporate philanthropy Corporate social responsibility Strategic partnerships
- ACS, (2009). American Cancer Society Workplace Solutions Program, http://www.acsworkplacesolutions.com/workplacegiving.asp. Visited on April 1, 2014.
- Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 282–316). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Bradshaw, A., & Zwick, D. (2014). The field of business sustainability and the death drive: A radical intervention. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2443-x.
- Brummel, L. & Smith, B. (2012). A Billion Ways to Make a Difference. Microsoft Blog. Web: http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2012/10/18/a-billion-ways-to-make-a-difference.aspx.
- Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar
- Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 917–945.Google Scholar
- Cohen, T. (2002, June 19). Advisors focus on donor values. Philanthropy Journal.Google Scholar
- Conti, A., Thursby, M. C., & Rothaermel, F. (2011). Show Me the Right Stuff: Signals for High Tech Startups (No. w17050). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Frank, R. H. (1996). Can socially responsible firms survive in a competitive environment? In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral essays in business ethics (pp. 86–103). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ireland, T. R., & Johnson, D. B. (1970). The economics of charity. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Public Choice.Google Scholar
- Johnson, O. (1966). Corporate sponsored philanthropy: An analysis of corporate contributions. Journal of Business, 39(4), 135–161.Google Scholar
- Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195–229.Google Scholar
- Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Maurer, T. J., Pierce, H. R., & Shore, L. M. (2002). Perceived beneficiary of employee development activity: A three dimensional social exchange model. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 432–444.Google Scholar
- Nunn, M. (2011). Millennials to business: Social responsibility isn’t optional. Washington Post, December 20.Google Scholar
- Parker, J. H. (2012). Skin in the game: For start-ups, investing, sacrifice, taking risks are essential. WRAL Tech Wire, November.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.Google Scholar
- Post, J. E., & Waddock, S. A. (1995). Strategic philanthropy and partnerships for economic progress. Contributions in Economics and Economic History, 36, 65–86.Google Scholar
- Schroder, D. A., Dovidio, J. F., Penner, L. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (1995). The social psychology of helping and altruism. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 571–586.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.Google Scholar
- Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wild, C. (1993). Corporate volunteer programs: Benefits to business. The Conference Board Report no. 1029. New York, NY: The Conference Board.Google Scholar
- Williams, T. P., & Lee, A.Y. (2007). Me and Benjamin: Transaction versus relationship wealth in subjective wellbeing. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Zukin, C. & Szeltner, M. (2012). Talent Report: What Workers Want in 2012. Report funded by the MacArthur Foundation for Net Impact. Web: www.netimpact.org/whatworkerswant.