Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 140, Issue 4, pp 755–786 | Cite as

Is Integrated Reporting Really the Superior Mechanism for the Integration of Ethics into the Core Business Model? An Empirical Analysis

  • Janine ManioraEmail author


This paper examines the impact of integrated reporting (IR) on the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues into the business model and the related economic and ESG performance changes. To investigate these internal and external transformational effects of IR, important differences between IR and alternative ESG reporting strategies are worked out. Using three matched samples of companies from around the world for the sample period 2002–2011, IR companies are matched with companies applying (a) no ESG reporting, (b) stand-alone ESG reporting, or (c) ESG reporting in the annual report. The results suggest that IR is a superior mechanism only for the integration of ESG issues into the core business model when comparing IR with the ESG reporting strategies of (a) no ESG reporting and (c) ESG reporting in annual reports. In comparison with (b), stand-alone ESG reporting, the results indicate that IR is negatively associated with the ESG integration level and with the economic and ESG performance. Moreover, this negative impact is lower for companies that have already implemented ESG management tools prior to the initiation of IR and is stronger for companies residing in countries with legal requirements for the disclosure of ESG information. A separate change analysis reveals that companies do not benefit from a switch from stand-alone ESG reporting to IR. Thus, this paper provides empirical evidence that contradicts the general notion of IR as a superior reporting mechanism, as the benefits of IR are driven by several factors.


Business model Corporate social responsibility ESG performance Ethical accounting Ethics Integrated reporting Integrated thinking Integration of ESG issues Non-financial disclosure Reporting strategies Sustainability reporting 



The author thanks the editors and the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. The paper has mainly benefited from the 18th International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society at the IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain, 2014. Thanks also go to the 2015 International Accounting Section Mid-year Meeting of the American Accounting Association.


  1. Adams, C. A. (2013). Understanding integrated reporting: The concise guide to integrated thinking and the future of corporate reporting (pp. 5–80). Oxford: Dō Sustainability.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference. Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, M. C., Bassen, A. & Frank, R. (2012), Integrating Sustainability Reports into Financial Statements: An Experimental Study, Working Paper, Hamburg: University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  5. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M. H. & Williams C. D. (2006) Accounting quality: International accounting standards and US GAAP, Working Paper, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 467–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Mariano Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 21(3), 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 13–233). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Braaksma, S. (2010). Six reasons why CFOs should be interested in sustainability. In R. G. Eccles, B. Cheng, & D. Saltzman (Eds.), The landscape of integrated reporting: Reflections and next steps (pp. 88–90). Cambridge, MA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.Google Scholar
  10. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchanan, J. M., & Stubblebine, W. C. (1962). Externality. Economica, 29(116), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). ‘Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Churet, C., & Eccles, R. G. (2014). Integrated reporting, quality of management, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(1), 56–64.Google Scholar
  17. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2007). The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 62, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 1085–1142.Google Scholar
  19. Deegan, C., Cooper, B. J., & Shelly, M. (2006a). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: Australian evidence. Australian Accounting Review, 16(39), 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deegan, C., Cooper, B. J., & Shelly, M. (2006b). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 329–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Druckman P. (2014) The journey towards IR – insight, examples, benefits. Audit Committee Quarterly I, 18–21.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, R. G., Herz, R., Keegan, E. M., & Phillips, D. M. H. (2001). The value reporting revolution: Moving beyond the earnings game (pp. 1–319). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim G. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance, Working Paper, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  26. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy (pp. 1–224). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2011). Accelerating the adoption of integrated reporting. In F. de Leo & M. Vollbracht (Eds.), CSR Index (pp. 70–92). Boston: InnoVatio Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate and integrated reporting: A functional perspective, Working Paper, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  29. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(4), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ethical Corporation (EC) Newsdesk (2010). The future of corporate responsibility and sustainability reporting: Integration. Available at
  31. García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 22, 828–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graafland, J. J., & Smid, H. (2013). Impact measurement and performance analysis of CSR (IMPACT), WP 2 Econometric analysis, IMPACT Working Paper 10. Available at
  33. Griffin, P. A., & Sun, Y. (2013) Going green: Market reaction to CSR newswire releases, Working Paper, Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  34. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed., pp. 1–415). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Hung, M., Shi, J. & Wang, Y. (2013). The Effect of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Information Asymmetry: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China’, Asian Finance Association (AsFA) 2013 Conference.Google Scholar
  38. Hung, M., & Subramanyam, K. (2007). Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: The case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), 623–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Integrated Reporting Committee (IRC) (2010). An integrated report is a new requirement, Press Release available at:
  40. Integrated Reporting Committee (IRC) of South Africa (2011). Framework for Integrated Reporting and the Integrated Report, Discussion Paper, Integrated Reporting Committee (IRC) of South Africa.Google Scholar
  41. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2010). Formation of the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC). Available at
  42. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2012). Understanding transformation - Building the Business Case for Integrated Reporting, International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC).Google Scholar
  43. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2013a). Integrated ReportingThe Pilot Programme 2013 Yearbook: Business and Investors explore the sustainability perspective of Integrated Reporting, International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC).Google Scholar
  44. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2013b). The international Integrated Reporting Framework, International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC).Google Scholar
  45. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2014). The IIRC Available at:
  46. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting, Working Paper 11-100, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  47. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations, Working Paper 11-017, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  48. Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. (2012). Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and Environment, 21, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.Google Scholar
  50. KPMG (2011). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2011. Available at
  51. KPMG (2012). Integrated Reporting: Performance insight through better business reporting, Issue 2, KPMG.Google Scholar
  52. KPMG (2013). Carrots and sticks: sustainability reporting policies worldwide - today’s best practice, tomorrow’s trends, KPMG.Google Scholar
  53. Krippendorff, K. (1995). Internalization. In F. Heylighen, C. Joslyn, & V. Turchin (Eds.), Principia cybernetica web. Brussels: Free University of Brussels.Google Scholar
  54. Lang, M. H., Lins, K. V., & Maffett, M. G. (2012). Transparency, liquidity, and valuation: International evidence on when transparency matters most. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 729–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lang, M., Lins, K. V., & Miller, D. (2003). ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross-listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2), 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., Carrasco-Fenech, F., Caro-Gonzalez, F. J., Correa-Ruiz, C., & Paez-Sandubete, J. M. (2001). The role of environmental accounting in organizational change: An exploration of Spanish companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(2), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lev, B. (2003). Remarks on the measurement, valuation, and reporting of intangible assets. Economic Policy Review, 9(3), 17–22.Google Scholar
  60. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marquis, C., & Toffel, M. (2011). The globalization of corporate environmental disclosure: Accountability or greenwashing?’, Working Paper, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  62. Marquis, C., & Toffel, M. (2014). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing, Working Paper, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  63. O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: an Irish story. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Orlitzky, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals, Accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports’. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. (2008). The impact of voluntary environmental disclosure quality on firm value, Working Paper, Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, T., & Miles, P. (2013). CSR longevity: Evidence from long-term practices in large corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 16, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rochlin, S., & Grant, B. (2010) Integrating Integrated Reporting. In R. G. Eccles, B. Cheng, & D. Saltzman (Eds.), The landscape of integrated reporting: Reflections and next steps (pp. 76–80). Massachusetts: The President and Fellows of Harvard College Cambridge, 02138.Google Scholar
  73. Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Serafeim, G.: 2014, ‘Integrated Reporting and Investor Clientele’, Working Paper, Cambridge, ME: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  75. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An International comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA) and the King Committee (2009). King Code of Governance for South Africa 2009 (King III), The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA) and the King Committee.Google Scholar
  77. Tucker, J. W. (2011). Selection Bias and Econometric Remedies in Accounting and Finance Research. Journal of Accounting Literature, Winter 2010.Google Scholar
  78. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Watts, R. L., & Zimmermann, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134.Google Scholar
  80. Welker, M. (1995). Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 801–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and Economics, Chair of Accounting and AuditingRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations