The Paradox of Diversity Initiatives: When Organizational Needs Differ from Employee Preferences
- 936 Downloads
Women are underrepresented in the upper echelons of management in most countries. Despite the effectiveness of identity conscious initiatives for increasing the proportion of women, many organizations have been reluctant to implement such initiatives because potential employees may perceive them negatively. Given the increasing competition for labor, attracting talent is relevant for the long-term success of organizations. In this study, we used an experimental design (N = 693) to examine the effects of identity blind and identity conscious gender diversity initiatives on people’s pursuit intentions toward organizations using them. We used counterfactual thinking, derived from fairness theory, as a guiding framework for our hypothesis development and investigated the moderating influence of a forthcoming government-mandated gender quota as well as individual characteristics (e.g., gender). Participants reviewed statements regarding workplace diversity initiatives and rated either the initiatives’ effectiveness or indicated their intentions to pursue employment with organizations using them. Of those rating pursuit intentions, half were informed that the country in which they were conducting their job search was about to implement gender quotas. Results indicated a diversity management paradox such that initiatives perceived as more effective made organizations using them less attractive as employers. However, these negative perceptions were mitigated by a government-mandated quota, and also lower among women. Implications for the study and practice of diversity are discussed.
KeywordsDiversity Diversity paradox Gender Quota Organizational attractiveness Pursuit intentions
We wish to thank David Kravitz, Meinald Thielsch, and Daniel Kluger for their helpful comments and advice on this research project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Research involving human participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Catalyst. (2013a). The 2013 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500 Women Board Directors. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2013-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors.
- Catalyst. (2013b). Women in Management, Global Comparison. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-management-global-comparison.
- Catalyst. (2014). Women on Boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-boards.
- Dustmann, C., & Schönberg, U. (2012). Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children’s long-term outcomes. American Economic Journal, 4, 190–224.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2012).The current situation of gender equality in Germany country profile.Retrieved fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/epo_campaign/country-profile_germany_en.pdf.
- European Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2013). Legal instruments for gender quotas in management boards. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/workshop/join/2013/474410/IPOL-FEMM_AT%282013%29474410_EN.pdf.
- Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- German Federal Statistical Office. (2014). Zahl der Ausländer in Deutschland zum Jahresende 2014 bei 8,2 Millionen. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2015/03/PD15_097_12521.html.
- German Ministry of Family Affairs. (2014a). Kabinett beschließt Gesetzentwurf zur Quote. Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/BMFSFJ/gleichstellung,did=212316.html.
- German Ministry of Family Affairs. (2014b). Response of the Government to the UNECE Questionnaire on the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration (1995) and the Outcome of the 23rd Special Session of the General Assembly (2000). Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Abteilung4/Pdf-Anlagen/ueberpruefung-der-umsetzung-vonpekingenglisch,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf.
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Grant Thornton. (2014). International Business Report. Women in business: From classroom to boardroom. Retrieved from http://www.grantthornton.global/globalassets/insights/article-pdfs/2014/ibr2014_wib_report_final.pdf.
- Kanning, U. P., Rist, F., Schmukle, S., Ehring, T., & Thielsch, M. T. (2014). Mythen der Alltagspsychologie II—Aus welchen Quellen speisen Menschen ihr Wissen über vermeintliche Forschungsergebnisse und wie gut sind diese Quellen? Skeptiker: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und kritisches Denken, 28 (1), 4–12.Google Scholar
- Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background paper for the World Development Report.Google Scholar
- Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., & Turner, C. (2014). The Female FTSE board Report 2014: Crossing the finish line. Cranfield, Bedford, England: Cranfield School of Management. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/the-female-ftse-board-report-2014.
- World Bank. (2013). Labor force participation. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/-indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS.