Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 144, Issue 3, pp 623–635 | Cite as

Machiavellianism, Moral Orientation, Social Desirability Response Bias, and Anti-intellectualism: A Profile of Canadian Accountants

  • Anis Triki
  • Gail Lynn CookEmail author
  • Darlene Bay
Article

Abstract

Prior research has demonstrated that accountants differ from the general population on many personality traits. Understanding accountants’ personality traits is important when these characteristics may impact professional behavior or ability to work with members of the business community. Our study investigates the relationship between Machiavellianism, ethical orientation (idealism, relativism), anti-intellectualism, and social desirability response bias in Canadian accountants. We find that Canadian accountants score much higher on the Machiavellianism scale than U.S. accountants. Additionally, our results show a significant relationship between Machiavellianism and relativism, idealism, anti-intellectualism, and social desirability response bias. Our results indicate that professional Canadian accountants may not share the same personality characteristics as U.S. accountants. We extend previous research investigating Canadian accountants, by explicitly recognizing the impact of social desirability response bias, and by including anti-intellectualism.

Keywords

Machiavellianism Social desirability response bias Ethical orientation Anti-intellectualism Individual differences 

References

  1. AICPA, Educational Requirements. (2015). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://www.aicpa.org/BecomeACPA/Pages/BecomeaCPA.aspx.
  2. Aleassa, H., Pearson, J. M., & McClurg, S. (2010). Investigating software piracy in Jordan: An extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass, K., Barnett, T., & Brown, G. (1999). Individual difference variables, ethical judgments, and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardi, R. A. (1997). The relationships among locus of control, perceptions of stress, and performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 13(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Bernardi, R. A. (2006). Associations between Hofstede’s cultural constructs and social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. E. (2010). Ethics instruction and the perceived acceptability of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chartered Professional Accountants Competency Map. (2012). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://unification.cpacanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/CompetencyMap.pdf.
  9. Chartered Professional Accountants Canada. (2015a). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/the-cpa-profession/uniting-the-canadian-accounting-profession/unification-status.
  10. Chartered Professional Accountants Canada, Pathways to Becoming a CPA. (2015b). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/become-a-cpa/pathways-to-becoming-a-cpa.
  11. Chen, Y., & Tang, T. L. (2013). The Bright and dark sides of religiosity among university students: Do gender, college major, and income matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clikeman, P. M., Schwartz, B. N., & Lathan, M. H. (2001). The effect of the 150-hour requirement on new accountants’ professional commitment, ethical orientation, and professionalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 627–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalton, D., & Radtke, R. R. (2013). The Joint Effects of Machiavellianism and ethical environment on whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas, P. C., & Wier, B. (2000). Integrating ethical dimensions into a model of budgetary slack creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Douglas, P. C., & Wier, B. (2005). Cultural and ethical effects in budgeting systems: A comparison of U.S. and Chinese managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eigenberger, M. E., & Sealander, K. A. (2001). A scale for measuring students anti-intellectualism. Psychological Reports, 89(2), 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elias, R. Z. (2008). Anti-intellectual attitudes and academic self-efficacy among business students. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elias, R. (2009). The impact of anti-intellectualism attitudes and academic self-efficacy on business students’ perceptions of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans, W., Lane, H., & O’Grady, S. (1992). Border crossings: Doing business in the U.S. Prentice Hall Canada, Scarborough, Ontario.Google Scholar
  26. Fathil, F. M., & Schmidtke, J. M. (2010). The relation between individual differences and accountants’ fraud detection ability. International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), 163–173.Google Scholar
  27. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H, Jr, & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 813–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gadenne, D. L., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2008). An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geiger, M. A., & O’Connell, B. T. (2000). An examination of using surrogate measures to assess social desirability response bias. Research on Accounting Ethics, 6, 107–120.Google Scholar
  31. Greenfield, A. C., Jr., Norman, C. S., & Wier, B. (2008). The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earnings management behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harman, H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Hartmann, F. G. H., & Maas, V. S. (2010). Why business unit controllers create budget slack: Involvement in management, social pressure, and achiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastings, S. E., & Finegan, J. E. (2011). The role of ethical ideology in reactions to injustice. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Hogue, M., Levashina, J., & Hang, H. (2013). Will i fake it? The interplay of gender, Machiavellianism, and self-monitoring on strategies for honesty in job interviews. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hook, R. J. (2004). Students’ anti-intellectual attitudes and adjustment to college. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 909–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunt, S. D., & Chonko, L. B. (1984). Marketing and Machiavellianism. The Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hyatt, T. A., & Prawitt, D. F. (2001). Does congruence between audit structure and auditors’ locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review, 76(2), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kish-Gephart, J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leary, M. R., Knight, P. D., & Barnes, B. D. (1986). Ethical ideologies of the Machiavellian. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lippert, S. K., & Volkmar, J. A. (2007). Cultural effects on technology performance and utilization: A comparison of U.S. and Canadian users. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(2), 56–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lopes, J., & Fletcher, C. (2004). Fairness of impression management in employment interviews: A cross-country study of the role of equity and Machiavellianism. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 32(8), 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McFarland, J. (2014). Canadian accountants merge under CPA designation. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 27, 2015 from the World Wide Web: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/canadian-accountants-merge-under-cpa-designation/article19299464/.
  47. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Pilch, I., & Turska, E. (2014). Relationships between Machiavellianism, organizational culture, and workplace bullying: Emotional abuse from the target’s and the perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ponemon, L. A. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3–4), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pope, K. R. (2005). Measuring the ethical propensities of accounting students: Mach IV versus DIT. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3(2–4), 89–111.Google Scholar
  51. Quah, C. H., Stewart, N., & Lee, J. W. C. (2012). Attitudes of business students’ toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer ethics: A cross-cultural study of the ethical beliefs of Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rayburn, J. M., & Rayburn, L. G. (1996). Relationship between Machiavellianism and type a personality and ethical-orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1209–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Responsibility Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robertson, C. J., Olson, B. J., Gilley, K. M., & Bao, Y. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical orientations and willingness to sacrifice ethical standards: china versus peru. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roxas, B., & Coetzer, A. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saulsbury, M. D., Brown, U. J., Heyliger, S. O., & Beale, R. L. (2011). Effect of dispositional traits on pharmacy students’ attitude toward cheating. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(4), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schlenker, B. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shafer, W. E. (2008). Ethical climate in Chinese CPA firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7/8), 825–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shafer, W. E., & Wang, Z. (2011). Effects of ethical context and Machiavellianism on attitudes toward earnings management in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 372–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaub, M. K., Finn, D. W., & Munter, P. (1993). The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on commitment and ethical sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145.Google Scholar
  64. Shome, A., & Rao, H. (2009). Machiavellianism in public accountants: some addition Canadian evidence. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(4), 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thorne, L., Massey, D. W., & Magnan, M. (2003). Institutional context and auditors’ moral reasoning: A Canada-U.S. comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tsui, J. S. L., & Gul, F. A. (1996). Auditors’ behaviour in an audit conflict situation: A research note on the role of locus of control and ethical reasoning. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(1), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valentine, S. R., & Bateman, C. R. (2011). The impact of ethical ideologies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Verbeke, W., Uwerkerk, C., & Peelen, E. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors on ethical decision making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1175–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vitell, S. J., & Patwardhan, A. (2008). The role of moral intensity and moral philosophy in ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison of china and the european union. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wakefield, R. L. (2008). Accounting and Machiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Individual differences in the acceptability of unethical information technology practices: The case of Machiavellianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yetmar, S. A., & Eastman, K. K. (2000). Tax practitioners’ ethical sensitivity: A model and empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(4), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 250–264.Google Scholar
  75. Zhang, M., Fan, D. D., & Zhu, C. J. (2014). High-performance work systems, corporate social performance and employee outcomes: Exploring the missing links. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingThe University of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of AccountingBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations