Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 143, Issue 1, pp 85–98 | Cite as

A Comparison of Canadian and U.S. CSR Strategic Alliances, CSR Reporting, and CSR Performance: Insights into Implicit–Explicit CSR

  • Linda Thorne
  • Lois S. Mahoney
  • Kristen Gregory
  • Susan Convery
Article

Abstract

We considered the question of how corporate social responsibility (CSR) differs between Canada and the U.S. Prior research has identified that national institutional differences exist between the two countries [Freeman and Hasnaoui, J Business Ethics 100(3):419–443, 2011], which may be associated with variations in their respective CSR practices. Matten and Moon [Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424, 2008] suggested that cross-national differences in firms’ CSR are depicted by an implicit–explicit conceptual framework: explicit CSR practices are deliberate and more strategic than implicit CSR practices. We compared Canada and U.S. CSR and examined how CSR strategic alliances, CSR reporting, and CSR performance in the two countries correspond to implicit versus explicit CSR practices, which we link to stakeholder and signaling perspectives. We relied upon a new database, the Sustainalytics Global Platform (SGP), and we found a positive association exists between CSR strategic alliances and the number of years that firms have issued standalone CSR reports in both countries. Moreover, we found that CSR scores mediated this association in the U.S., as U.S. firms with high CSR scores typically engage in more CSR strategic alliances. In Canada, we did not find this mediating effect. Our findings suggest that U.S. firms engage in signaling activities that are more strategic and explicit than their Canadian counterparts. This paper closes with implications for practice and theory.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Implicit–explicit Strategic alliances Signaling 

References

  1. Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, George A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics (The MIT Press), 84(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, J. (2010). From organization to organization: On creating value. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J., & Seitanidi, M. (2012a). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses, Part 1: Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, J., & Seitanidi, M. (2012b). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses, Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballou, B., Heitger, D., & Landes, C. E. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 202(6), 65–74.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barth, M., McNichols, M., & Wilson, R. P. (1997). Factors influencing firms’ disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies, 2, 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum, J. A., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2004). Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47(1), 58–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berthelot, S., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1–44.Google Scholar
  13. Bewley, K., & Li, Y. (2000). Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate Social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2–3), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarkson, P., Overell, M., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CorporateRegister.com. (2011). Which companies and reports feature in the GRI register? Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://www.corporat3434eregister.com/aboutreports.html.
  22. CorporateRegister.com. (2014). Which companies and reports feature in the GRI register? Retrieved September 8, 2014, from http://www.corporateregister.com.
  23. Cready, W. M., & Demirkan, S. (2008, July 11). Information environment characteristics of strategic alliances. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1158524.
  24. Dacin, M., Oliver, C., & Jean-Paul, R. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Demirkan, S., & Demirkan, I. (2014). Implications of strategic alliances for earning quality and capital market investors. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 1806–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Doh, J. (2012). What prompts companies to collaboration with NGOs? Recent evidence from the Netherlands. Business and Society. doi: 10.1177/0007650312439549.
  28. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Du, S., & Vieira, E. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. (2001). An overview of strategic alliances. Management Decision, 39(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goeltz, D. (2010). Alliance portfolio characteristics and organizational learning. In T. K. Das (Ed.), Researching strategic alliances: Emerging perspectives (pp. 181–206). New York: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gugerty, M. K. (2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Polymer Science, 42, 243–273.Google Scholar
  38. Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harley, M., & Warburton, J. (2008). Risks to business in social involvement. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 29(Spring), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Twin Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. UK: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Holloway, J., Ingberman, D., & King, R. (1999). An analysis of settlement and merit under federal securities law: What will be the effect of the reform of 1995? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 18(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2000). Is it ethical to use ethics as strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keasler, T. R., & Denning, K. C. (2009). A re-examination of corporate strategic alliances: New market responses. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48(1), 21–48.Google Scholar
  46. Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  47. Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2012). Business-NGO collaboration in a conflict setting: partnership activities in the democratic Republic of Congo. Business and Society, 51(3), 478–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Switzerland: KPMG International Cooperative.Google Scholar
  49. Li, L., Qian, G., & Qian, Z. (2013). Do partners in international strategic alliances share resources, costs, and risks? Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Thornton, D. B. (1997). Corporate disclosure of environmental liability information: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loza, J. (2004). Business-community partnerships: The case for community organization capacity building. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Magnan, M., Onge, S., & Thorne, L. (1996). Organizational performance and executive compensation: A Canada-U.S. comparison. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue, International Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 142–161.Google Scholar
  54. Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mahoney, L., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1–2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milgrom, P. (1981). Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2), 380–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohan, A. (2006). Global corporate social responsibilities management in MNCs. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
  61. Mooney Cotter, A. M. (2011). Culture clash: An international legal perspective on ethnic discrimination. London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  62. Mutch, N., & Aitken, R. (2009). Being fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate reputation and CSR partnerships. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(2), 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–88.Google Scholar
  64. SDC Platinum Database. (2013). Data Glossary. New York: Thomson Reuters joint ventures and alliance database.Google Scholar
  65. Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalization of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sorenson, C. (2011). Canada the good? Maclean’s, 123(23), 43.Google Scholar
  67. Stanny, E. (1998). Effect of regulation on changes in disclosure of and reserved amounts of environmental liabilities. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 3(4), 34–49.Google Scholar
  68. Sustainalytics. 2014. Research methodology. Amsterdam, Holland. Retrieved September 16, 2014 from http://www.sustainalytics.com/research-methodology.
  69. Thorne, L., Mahoney, L., & Bobek, D. (2010). A comparison of the association between corporate social responsibility and executive compensation: United States versus Canada. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 14, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vaidya, S. (2011). Understanding strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 12(6), 90–100.Google Scholar
  71. van de Ven, B. (2008). An ethical framework for the marketing of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 339–352.Google Scholar
  72. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wolf, K. (2008). Emerging patterns of global governance: The new interplay between the state, business and civil society. In A. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global citizenship (pp. 225–248). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Thorne
    • 1
  • Lois S. Mahoney
    • 2
  • Kristen Gregory
    • 3
  • Susan Convery
    • 4
  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Accounting and FinanceEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA
  3. 3.Eastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA
  4. 4.Broad College of BusinessMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations