Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-labels
- 837 Downloads
The current work examines how cues traditionally used to signal environmental friendliness, specifically the color green and eco-labels, and influence product efficacy perceptions and subsequent purchase intentions. Across three experiments, we find that environmental cues used in isolation (i.e., green color without an environmental label or an environmental label without green color) reduce perceptions of product efficacy. We argue that this efficacy discounting effect occurs because the isolated use of an environmental cue introduces category ambiguity by activating competing functionality and environmentally friendly schemas during evaluation. We discuss the implications of our findings for research on environmental consumption as well as offer insight into the effective use of environmental cues on product packaging.
KeywordsColor green Eco-labels Environmental cues Product packaging perceptions Product efficacy Categorization Category ambiguity Schema incongruity
Many thanks to the section editor and anonymous reviewers for their comments through the review process. We thank Paul Dion for his assistance with data collection. We also gratefully acknowledge the David Sobey Centre for Innovation in Retail and Services at the Sobey School of Business for their financial support.
- Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2014). Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 95–120. Google Scholar
- Franklin, D. (2008). Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility. Economist Newspaper.Google Scholar
- Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does product quality really mean. Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
- Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing Research, 79(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2008). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hopkins, M. S. (2009). What the ‘green’ consumer wants. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 87–89.Google Scholar
- Kaya, N., & Epps, H. H. (2004). Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College Student Journal, 38(3), 396.Google Scholar
- Loken, B., Barsalou, L. W., & Joiner, C. (2008). Categorization theory and research in consumer psychology. In C. P. Haugtvedt, F. Kardes, & P. M. Herr (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
- Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and Cognition (pp. 3–36). The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium.Google Scholar
- Naz, K., & Epps, H. (2004). Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College Student Journal, 38(3), 396–405.Google Scholar
- Nielsen (2011). Sustainable efforts & environmental concerns around the world: A Nielsen report. Retrieved August, from www.nielsen.com.
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- TerraChoice (2010). The sins of greenwashing home and family edition: A report on environmental claims made in the North American consumer market. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from www.sinsofgreenwashing.org.
- Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61–68.Google Scholar