Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment
- 966 Downloads
This study attempts to advance knowledge in the area of controversial advertising by examining the antecedents and consequences of controversial advert perceptions in the context of social media, and particularly social networking sites (SNS). Specifically, we explore how ethical judgement and religious commitment shape controversial advert perceptions leading to attitudes towards the advert, brand attitudes and purchase intentions. Our results indicate that when a SNS advert is judged to be ethically acceptable, the level of perceived advert controversy is lower. However, the impact of ethical judgement on controversial advert perceptions becomes significant and positive when intrapersonal commitment and interpersonal religious commitment are introduced as moderators. This result implies that the level of religious commitment changes the ethical judgement–controversial advert perceptions relationship. The results also highlight that controversial advert perceptions negatively influence attitude towards the advert. The study contributes to the limited knowledge on controversial advertising on SNS, yielding significant and relevant implications for academics and advertisers alike, in their effort to improve advertising effectiveness without offending or alienating target audiences.
KeywordsControversial advert perceptions Ethical judgement Religious commitment Social networking sites
The authors would like to thank the editor and the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions that have been immensely useful in development of this article.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Alexander, M. W., & Judd, B. (1978). Do nudes in ads enhance brand recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 18(1), 47–50.Google Scholar
- Belch, G., Belch, M., & Guolla, M. (2011). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective, with connect access card fourth Canadian edition. Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Berger, W. (2001). Advertising today. Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1985). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: The role of message repetition. In Psychological processes and advertising effects (pp. 9–11). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Colwyn, S. (2014). Research summary: Social media marketing effectiveness in 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-governance/social-media-marketing-effectiveness-2014/.
- Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 268–280.Google Scholar
- Davidson, J. D., & Knudsen, D. D. (1977). A new approach to religious commitment. Sociological Focus, 10(2), 151–173.Google Scholar
- Eagleman, A., & Krohn, B. (2012). Sponsorship awareness, attitudes, and purchase intentions of road race series participants. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21(4), 210–220.Google Scholar
- Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 29–42.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Ford, J. B., & LaTour, M. S. (1993). Differing reactions to female role portrayals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 33, 43–52.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In S. N. Craig & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
- Jagger, S. (2011). Ethical sensitivity: A foundation for moral judgement. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8, 13–30.Google Scholar
- Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
- Luqmani, M., Yavas, U., & Quraeshi, Z. (1987). Advertising in Saudi Arabia: Content and regulation. International Journal of Advertising, 6(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
- Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research and application (pp. 45–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Michaelidou, N., & Moraes, C. (2013). Internet users’ attitudes towards advertising on Facebook. In 2013 World marketing congress, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Michell, P., & Al-Mossawi, M. (1999). Religious commitment related to message contentiousness. International Journal of Advertising, 18, 427–444.Google Scholar
- Nielsen. (2012). State of the media: The social media report, Q3 2011. Retrieved December 6, 2012, from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/2011/.
- Nimeh, G. (2007). Digital Essays: The people have spoken By, Iris, campaignlive.co.uk. Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/news/668070/.
- Park, J., & Stoel, L. (2005). Effect of brand familiarity, experience and information on online apparel purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 148–160.Google Scholar
- Phau, I., & Prendergast, G. (2001). Offensive advertising: A view from Singapore, A preliminary study. Paper presented at the Australia/New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA) conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Prendergast, G., & Hwa, H. C. (2003). An Asian perspective of offensive advertising on the Web. International Journal of Advertising, 22, 393–411.Google Scholar
- Tinkham, S. F., & Reid, L. N. (1988). Sex appeal in advertising revisited: Validation of a typology. Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 118–123). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
- Truong, Y., & Simmons, G. (2010). Perceived intrusiveness in digital advertising: Strategic marketing implications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 239–256.Google Scholar
- Waller, D. (2004). What factors make controversial advertising offensive? Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/241161860.
- Waller, D. (2006). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(2/3), 3–16.Google Scholar
- Worthington, E. L. J., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., & O’Connor, L. (2003). The religious commitment inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., Schmitt, M. M., Berry, J. T., Bursley, K. H., & O Conner, L. (2012). The religious commitment inventory-10 (RCI-10). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from http://www.midss.ie.