Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 249–265 | Cite as

Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment

  • Selma Kadić-MaglajlićEmail author
  • Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić
  • Milena Micevski
  • Nina Michaelidou
  • Ekaterina Nemkova
Article

Abstract

This study attempts to advance knowledge in the area of controversial advertising by examining the antecedents and consequences of controversial advert perceptions in the context of social media, and particularly social networking sites (SNS). Specifically, we explore how ethical judgement and religious commitment shape controversial advert perceptions leading to attitudes towards the advert, brand attitudes and purchase intentions. Our results indicate that when a SNS advert is judged to be ethically acceptable, the level of perceived advert controversy is lower. However, the impact of ethical judgement on controversial advert perceptions becomes significant and positive when intrapersonal commitment and interpersonal religious commitment are introduced as moderators. This result implies that the level of religious commitment changes the ethical judgement–controversial advert perceptions relationship. The results also highlight that controversial advert perceptions negatively influence attitude towards the advert. The study contributes to the limited knowledge on controversial advertising on SNS, yielding significant and relevant implications for academics and advertisers alike, in their effort to improve advertising effectiveness without offending or alienating target audiences.

Keywords

Controversial advert perceptions Ethical judgement Religious commitment Social networking sites 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions that have been immensely useful in development of this article.

References

  1. Aaker, D. A., & Bruzzone, D. E. (1985). Causes of irritation in advertising. The Journal of Marketing, 49, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Aleassa, H., Pearson, J., & McClurg, S. (2011). Investigating software piracy in Jordan: An extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander, M. W., & Judd, B. (1978). Do nudes in ads enhance brand recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 18(1), 47–50.Google Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnes, J. H, Jr, & Dotson, M. J. (1990). An exploratory investigation into the nature of offensive television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belch, G., Belch, M., & Guolla, M. (2011). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective, with connect access card fourth Canadian edition. Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Bello, D. C., Pitts, R. E., & Etzel, M. J. (1983). The communication effects of controversial sexual content in television programs and commercials. Journal of Advertising, 12(3), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger, W. (2001). Advertising today. Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W., & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 557–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boddewyn, J. J., & Kunz, H. (1991). Sex and decency issues in advertising: General and international dimensions. Business Horizons, 34(5), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brajnik, G., & Gabrielli, S. (2010). A review of online advertising effects on the user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 971–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, P. S., & Stayman, M. D. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1985). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: The role of message repetition. In Psychological processes and advertising effects (pp. 9–11). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Z., & Berger, J. (2013). When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, Q., Clifford, S. J., & Wells, W. D. (2002). Attitude toward the site II: New information. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(2), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N., & Siamagka, N. (2013). A typology of internet users based on comparative affective states: Evidence from eight countries. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Christy, T. P., & Haley, E. (2008). The influence of advertising context on perceptions of offense. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Colwyn, S. (2014). Research summary: Social media marketing effectiveness in 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-governance/social-media-marketing-effectiveness-2014/.
  26. Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crosier, K., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2001). Advertising complainants: Who and where are they? Journal of Marketing Communications, 7(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 268–280.Google Scholar
  29. Dao, W. V. T., Le, A. N. H., Chen, J. M. S., & Chen, D. C. (2014). Social media advertising value: The case of transitional economies in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davidson, J. D., & Knudsen, D. D. (1977). A new approach to religious commitment. Sociological Focus, 10(2), 151–173.Google Scholar
  31. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delener, N. (1994). Religious contrasts in consumer decision behaviour patterns: Their dimensions. European Journal of Marketing, 28(5), 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eagleman, A., & Krohn, B. (2012). Sponsorship awareness, attitudes, and purchase intentions of road race series participants. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21(4), 210–220.Google Scholar
  34. Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 29–42.Google Scholar
  35. Fam, K. S., & Waller, D. S. (2003). Advertising controversial products in the Asia Pacific: What makes them offensive? Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fam, K. S., Waller, D. S., Ong, F. S., & Yang, Z. (2008). Controversial product advertising in China: Perceptions of three generational cohorts. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(6), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  38. Ford, J. B., & LaTour, M. S. (1993). Differing reactions to female role portrayals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 33, 43–52.Google Scholar
  39. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fritz, M. S., Taylor, A. B., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2012). Explanation of two anomalous results in statistical mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(1), 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gartner, J. (1996). Religious commitment, mental health, and prosocial behavior. Religion and the Clinical Practice of Psychology, 30, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibbs, P., Ilkan, M., & Pouloukas, S. (2007). The ethics of marketing in Muslim and Christian communities: Insights for global marketing. Equal Opportunities International, 26(7), 678–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Giebelhausen, M., & Novak, T. P. (2012). Web advertising: Sexual content on eBay. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 840–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grazer, W. F., & Keesling, G. (1995). The effect of print advertising’s use of sexual themes on brand recall and purchase intention: A product specific investigation of male responses. Journal of Applied Business Research, 11(3), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgement work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ha, L., & McCann, K. (2008). An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  50. Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang, L. S., Chou, Y. J., & Lin, C. H. (2008). The influence of reading motives on the responses after reading blogs. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huhmann, B. A., & Mott-Stenerson, B. (2008). Controversial advertisement executions and involvement on elaborative processing and comprehension. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In S. N. Craig & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jagger, S. (2011). Ethical sensitivity: A foundation for moral judgement. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8, 13–30.Google Scholar
  57. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  59. Karson, E. J., & Fisher, R. J. (2005). Reexamining and extending the dual mediation hypothesis in an on-line advertising context. Psychology and Marketing, 22(4), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kay, A., & Furnham, A. (2013). Age and sex stereotypes in British television advertisements. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(3), 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kerr, G., Mortimera, K., Dickinson, S., & Waller, D. S. (2012). Buy, boycott or blog: Exploring online consumer power to share, discuss and distribute controversial advertising messages. European Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lass, P., & Hart, S. (2004). National cultures, values and lifestyles influencing consumers’ perception towards sexual imagery in alcohol advertising: An exploratory study in the UK, Germany and Italy. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(5–6), 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. LaTour, (1990). Female nudity in print advertising: An analysis of gender differences in arousal and ad response. Psychology and Marketing, 7(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. LaTour, & Henthorne, T. (1994). Ethical judgment of sexual appeals in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. H. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 1049–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Luqmani, M., Yavas, U., & Quraeshi, Z. (1987). Advertising in Saudi Arabia: Content and regulation. International Journal of Advertising, 6(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  69. Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research and application (pp. 45–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  70. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 53, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. MacKenzie, S., Lutz, R., & Belch, G. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Michaelidou, N., & Moraes, C. (2013). Internet users’ attitudes towards advertising on Facebook. In 2013 World marketing congress, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  73. Michell, P., & Al-Mossawi, M. (1999). Religious commitment related to message contentiousness. International Journal of Advertising, 18, 427–444.Google Scholar
  74. Millan, E., & Elliott, R. (2004). Offensive advertising, public policy, and the law: The rulings on the Zagorka case. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nielsen. (2012). State of the media: The social media report, Q3 2011. Retrieved December 6, 2012, from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/2011/.
  76. Nimeh, G. (2007). Digital Essays: The people have spoken By, Iris, campaignlive.co.uk. Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/news/668070/.
  77. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Park, J., & Stoel, L. (2005). Effect of brand familiarity, experience and information on online apparel purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 148–160.Google Scholar
  79. Peterson, R. A., Albaum, G., Merunka, D., Munuera, J. L., & Smith, S. M. (2010). Effects of nationality, gender, and religiosity on business-related ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Phau, I., & Prendergast, G. (2001). Offensive advertising: A view from Singapore, A preliminary study. Paper presented at the Australia/New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA) conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
  81. Pilotta, J. J., & Schultz, D. (2005). Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(01), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pope, N. K. L., Voges, K. E., & Brown, M. R. (2004). The effect of provocation in the form of mild erotica on attitude to the ad and corporate image: differences between cause-related and product-based advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Prendergast, G., Ho, B., & Phau, I. (2002). A Hong Kong view of offensive advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 8(3), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Prendergast, G., & Hwa, H. C. (2003). An Asian perspective of offensive advertising on the Web. International Journal of Advertising, 22, 393–411.Google Scholar
  87. Putrevu, S., & Swimberghek, K. (2013). The influence of religiosity on consumer ethical judgements and responses toward sexual appeals. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Reidenbach, R., & Robin, D. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rotfeld, H. J. (2006). Understanding advertising clutter and the real solution to declining audience attention to mass media commercial messages. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 180–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rutter, A., & Hine, D. W. (2005). Sex differences in workplace aggression: An investigation of moderation and mediation effects. Aggressive Behavior, 31(3), 254–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sabri, O., & Obermiller, C. (2012). Consumer perception of taboo in ads. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 869–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schneider, H., Krieger, J., & Bayraktar, A. (2011). The impact of intrinsic religiosity on consumers’ ethical beliefs: Does it depend on the type of religion? A comparison of Christian and Muslim consumers in Germany and Turkey. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Severn, J., Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (1990). The effects of sexual and non-sexual advertising appeals and information level on cognitive processing and communication effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Soley, L. C., & Reid, L. N. (1988). Taking it off: Are models in magazine ads wearing less? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 960–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sood, J. (1995). Religiosity and nationality an exploratory study of their effect on consumer behavior in Japan and the United States. Journal of Business Research, 34, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Speck, P. S., & Elliott, M. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., & Westerman, D. (2009). Presence, sex, and bad news: Exploring the responses of men and women to tragic news stories in varying media. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tinkham, S. F., & Reid, L. N. (1988). Sex appeal in advertising revisited: Validation of a typology. Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 118–123). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  99. Truong, Y., & Simmons, G. (2010). Perceived intrusiveness in digital advertising: Strategic marketing implications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 239–256.Google Scholar
  100. Varul, M. Z. (2008). After heroism: Religion versus consumerism. Preliminaries for an investigation of Protestantism and Islam under consumer culture. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 19(2), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vermillion, L., Lassar, W., & Winsor, R. (2002). The Hunt–Vitell general theory of marketing ethics: Can it enhance our understanding of principal-agent relationships in channels of distribution? Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Vezina, R., & Paul, O. (1997). Provocation in advertising: A conceptualization and an empirical assessment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vitell, S. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2008). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2006). Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Walker, A. G., Smither, J. W., & DeBode, J. (2011). The effects of religiosity on ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Waller, D. (2004). What factors make controversial advertising offensive? Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/241161860.
  107. Waller, D. (2006). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(2/3), 3–16.Google Scholar
  108. Waller, D. S., Fam, K. S., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2005). Advertising of controversial products: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Winer, R. S. (2009). New communications approaches in marketing: Issues and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wong, H. M. (2007). Religiousness, love of money, and ethical attitudes of Malaysian Evangelical Christians in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Worthington, E. L. J., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., & O’Connor, L. (2003). The religious commitment inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., Schmitt, M. M., Berry, J. T., Bursley, K. H., & O Conner, L. (2012). The religious commitment inventory-10 (RCI-10). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from http://www.midss.ie.
  113. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zhou, X., Han, Y., & Wang, R. (2012). An empirical investigation on firms’ proactive and passive motivation for bribery in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selma Kadić-Maglajlić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić
    • 1
  • Milena Micevski
    • 2
  • Nina Michaelidou
    • 2
  • Ekaterina Nemkova
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Economics and BusinessUniversity of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.School of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  3. 3.Nottingham University Business SchoolNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations