Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 231–233 | Cite as

Introduction to the Special Thematic Symposium on the Ethics of Controversial Online Advertising

  • Caroline MoraesEmail author
  • Nina Michaelidou


The field of marketing and consumer ethics has evolved considerably over the past 20 years, yet research on specific areas of advertising ethics remains limited. This limitation persists despite developments in digital technologies, and the impact they have had on advertising practice generally and online advertising more specifically. Online media are becoming increasingly populated by advertising content, as consumers continuously navigate ever-evolving mediascapes. Thus, there is a need to examine the ethical issues associated with the use of controversial advertising online, as well as consumers’ responses to such ads. This special thematic symposium addresses this literature gap, which is at the intersection of consumer ethics, e-marketing, and controversial advertising. The two papers in the special thematic symposium present new research in this area, along with some initial ethical implications as well as potential for future research.


Advertising ethics Online advertising Controversial advertising Consumer ethics 



We would like to express our gratitude to the reviewers who helped with the reviewing process and provided constructive comments to the authors of this special symposium. Furthermore, we extend our appreciation to the editorial office for their continuous support. Finally, we would like to thank the section editor, Professor Thomas Maak, for giving us the opportunity to organize this special thematic symposium.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2), 295–310. doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakir, A., & Vitell, S. (2010). The ethics of food advertising targeted toward children: Parental viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 299–311. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0084-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltramini, R. F. (2006). Consumer believability of information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 333–343. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-4711-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benet, S., Pitts, R. E., & LaTour, M. (1993). The appropriateness of fear appeal use for health care marketing to the elderly: Is it OK to scare granny? Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 45–55. doi: 10.1007/BF01845786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camenisch, P. F. (1991). Marketing ethics: Some dimensions of the challenge. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 245–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00382961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charters, D. (2002). Electronic monitoring and privacy issues in business-marketing: The ethics of the doubleclick experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 243–254. doi: 10.1023/A:1013824909970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cunningham, A. (2003). Autonomous consumption: Buying into the ideology of capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 229–236. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005784.48184.d6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(03), 268–280. doi: 10.1017/S0021849903030332.Google Scholar
  9. Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2008). Exploring consumer reactions to incongruent mild disgust appeals. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 249–269. doi: 10.1080/13527260802141231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. eMarketer. (2014). Online Ad spending in europe topped €27 billion in 2013. May 29.
  11. Erdogan, B. Z. (2008). Controversial advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 247–248. doi: 10.1080/13527260802141462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fam, K. S., & Waller, D. S. (2003). Advertising controversial products in the Asia Pacific: What makes them offensive? Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 237–250. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005785.29778.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Google. (2015). Sensitive Ad categories.
  14. Hackley, C. E., & Kitchen, P. J. (1999). Ethical perspectives on the postmodern communications Leviathan. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1005933424439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henthorne, T. L., & LaTour, M. S. (1995). A model to explore the ethics of erotic stimuli in print advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(7), 561–569. doi: 10.1007/BF00871984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A Revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153. doi: 10.1177/0276146706290923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyman, M. (2009). Responsible Ads: A workable ideal. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 199–210. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9879-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linton, J. D., & Walsh, S. T. (2012). Introduction to the field of nanotechnology ethics and policy. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 547–549. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1428-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maes, J. D., Jeffery, A., & Smith, T. V. (1998). The American Association of Advertising Agencies (4As) standards of practice: How far does this professional association’s code of ethics’ influence reach? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1155–1161. doi: 10.1023/A:1005790324722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nairn, A., & Berthon, P. (2003). Creating the customer: The influence of advertising on consumer market segments—evidence and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 83–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1021620825950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nebenzahl, I. D., & Jaffe, E. D. (1998). Ethical dimensions of advertising executions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7), 805–815. doi: 10.1023/A:1005850812845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nwachukwu, S. L. S., Vitell, S. J., Gilbert, F. W. & Barnes, J. H. (1997). Ethics and social responsibility in marketing: An examination of the ethical evaluation of advertising strategies. Journal of Business Research, 39(2), 107–118.
  23. Palmer, D. E. (2005). Pop-ups, cookies, and spam: Toward a deeper analysis of the ethical significance of internet marketing practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 271–280. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-1421-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Polonsky, M. J., Bailey, J., Baker, H., Basche, C., Jepson, C., & Neath, L. (1998). Communicating environmental information: Are marketing claims on packaging misleading? Journal of Business Ethics, 17(3), 281–294. doi: 10.1023/A:1005731914135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandikci, O. (2001). Living with contradictions: Representational politics and politics of representation in advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 309–314.
  26. Schroeder, J. E., & Borgerson, J. L. (2005). An ethics of representation for international marketing communication. International Marketing Review, 22(5), 578–600. doi: 10.1108/02651330510624408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaver, D. (2003). Toward an analytical structure for evaluating the ethical content of decisions by advertising professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 291–300. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005787.46742.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Snyder, W. (2011). Making the case for enhanced advertising ethics. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(3), 477–483.
  29. Spurgin, E. W. (2003). What’s wrong with computer-generated images of perfection in advertising? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 257–268. doi: 10.1023/A:1024155629554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stead, B. A., & Gilbert, J. (2001). Ethical issues in electronic commerce. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 75–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1012266020988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vitell, S. J. (2001). Introduction to special issue on marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1023/A:1010686807048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 33–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1022907014295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vitell, S., Bing, M., Davison, H., Ammeter, A., Garner, B., & Novicevic, M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9980-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: An application and empirical testing of the Hunt–Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153–178. doi: 10.1108/07363760110386018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waller, D. (2006). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(2/3), 3–16. doi: 10.1300/J057v11n02_02.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of ‘Unmentionables’. Harvard Business Review, 59(1), 91–102. Available from:
  37. Wong, K. L. (1996). Tobacco advertising and children: The limits of first amendment protection. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(10), 1051–1064. doi: 10.1007/BF00412046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business, Environment & Society, Centre for Business in Society (CBiS)Coventry UniversityCoventryUK
  2. 2.School of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK

Personalised recommendations