The Sales Profession as a Subculture: Implications for Ethical Decision Making
- 2.7k Downloads
Salespeople have long been considered unique employees. They tend to work apart from each other and experience little daily contact with supervisors and other organizational employees. Additionally, salespeople interact with customers in an increasingly complex and multifunctional environment. This provides numerous opportunities for unethical behavior which has been chronicled in the popular press as well as academic research. Much of the research in sales ethics has relied on conceptual foundations which focus on individual and organizational influencers on ethical decision making. While significant, contributors to this research suggest that alternative theoretical perspectives and methods of investigation should be utilized and call for more research on the status of professional selling as a whole. We answer this call by exploring an alternative and complementary perspective based on the theory of occupational choice, social learning, and work groups to gain insight on how the sales profession evolves as its own subculture that extends beyond individual and organizational boundaries. First, we discuss the characteristics of the sales profession and empirically examine the relationship between typical individual and organizational factors and sales professionals’ perceptions of ethical behavior. Second, we offer a theoretical explanation that our findings may be due to how salespeople choose and are socialized into the subculture of the sales profession. Third, we examine this theoretical perspective via qualitative in-depth interviews with experienced sales professionals. Results and implications are discussed in terms of a sales profession code of ethics and future research directions.
KeywordsEthical decision making Codes of ethics Sales Subculture Socialization
- Casserly, M. (2012, September 25). The 10 best careers for wannabe entrepreneurs. Forbes.com.Google Scholar
- Darmon, R. Y. (1998). A conceptual scheme and procedure for classifying sales positions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18(3), 31–46.Google Scholar
- Dubinsky, A. J., Berkowitz, E. N., & Rudelius, W. (1980). Ethical problems of field sales personnel. MSU Business Topics (Summer), 11-16.Google Scholar
- Dubinsky, A. J., & Gwin, J. M. (1981). Business ethics: Buyers and sellers. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 17(4), 9–16.Google Scholar
- Dubinsky, A. J., & Ingram, T. M. (1983). Important first-line sales management qualifications: What sales executives think. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 3(1), 18–26.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
- Fogel, S., Hoffmeister, D., Rocco, R., & Strunk, D. P. (2012). Teaching sales. Harvard Business Review, 90(7/8), 94–99.Google Scholar
- Glesne, C. (1998). Becoming qualitative researchers. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
- Hawes, J. M., Rich, A. K., & Widmier, S. M. (2004). Assessing the development of the sales profession. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 24(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeister, D. C., & Rocco, R. A. (2012). 2011–2012 Sales effectiveness survey. Chicago: DePaul University, Center for Sales Leadership.Google Scholar
- Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Lagace, R. R., Ingram, T. N., & Boorom, M. L. (1994). An exploratory study of buyers’ perceptions of salesperson unethical behavior: scale development and validation. In R. Achrol & A. Mitchell (eds.), Enhancing knowledge development in marketing, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Conference (pp. 118–123). Chicago.Google Scholar
- Sales Education Foundation. (2015). www.salesfoundation.org.
- Sales & Marketing Executives International. (2015). www.smei.org.
- Schwepker, C. H, Jr, & Good, D. J. (2004). Marketing control and sales force orientation. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 24(3), 167–179.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Trevino, L. K. (1986). Moral reasoning and business ethics: implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 445–459.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Occupational outlook handbook. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/sales/home.htm.
- University Sales Center Alliance. (2015). www.universitysalescenteralliance.org.
- Wax, Ken. (2012). Salespeople are different—And so are companies, www.trainingmag.com.
- Wotruba, T. R. (1990). A comprehensive framework for the analysis of ethical behavior, with a focus on sales organizations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10(2), 29–42.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar