Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 137, Issue 4, pp 699–720 | Cite as

Facilitating Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts: Exploring the Injustice Gap, Emotions, and Expressive Writing Interventions

  • Laurie J. BarclayEmail author
  • Maria Francisca Saldanha


Despite the numerous benefits associated with forgiveness, many individuals find it difficult to forgive. This is especially true in organizations, where forgiveness is rare and can be under-valued. Across two studies, we explore how to facilitate forgiveness within organizational contexts and in the aftermath of workplace unfairness. We examine whether individuals can reduce the “injustice gap” that can be created by violations and enhance forgiveness through expressive writing interventions—guided writing techniques that can be self-administered. Participants wrote about their reactions to a fictional scenario (Study 1; N = 155) or an actual workplace experience (Study 2; N = 96). Results indicate that expressive writing was associated with higher reported perceived resolution. Whereas negative emotions mediated this relationship in Study 1, positive emotions and perceived injustice mediated this relationship in Study 2. Perceived resolution also mediated the relationship between expressive writing and forgiveness. Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications are discussed.


Expressive writing Fairness Forgiveness Injustice gap Negative emotions Positive emotions 



This research was supported by grants awarded to the first (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Early Researcher Award) and second author (Ontario Trillium Scholarship).


  1. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., Grover, S., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: The role of interpersonal forgiveness in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1–78). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Barclay, L. J., & Saldanha, M. F. (2015). Recovering from organizational injustice: New directions in theory and research. In M. Ambrose & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in work organizations (pp. 497–522). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barclay, L. J., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2008). Shifting perspectives: Helping victims recover from organizational justice violations. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Vol. 6, pp. 155–199)., Justice, morality, and social responsibility Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  9. Barclay, L. J., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2009). Healing the wounds of organizational injustice: Examining the benefits of expressive writing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. (2009). Greenberg doth protest too much: Application always has been, and victims and morality always will be critical for advancing organizational justice research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy–altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Batten, S. V., Follette, V. M., Hall, M. L. R., & Palm, K. M. (2003). Physical and psychological effects of written disclosure among sexual abuse survivors. Behavior Therapy, 33, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Bobocel, D. R. (2013). Coping with unfair events constructively or destructively: The roles of overall justice and self-other orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 720–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chusmir, L. H., & Parker, B. (1991). Gender and situational differences in managers’ values: A look at work and home lives. Journal of Business Research, 23, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox, S. S., Bennett, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2012). An empirical test of forgiveness motives’ effects on employees’ health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coyle, C. T., & Enright, R. D. (1997). Forgiveness intervention with postabortion men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1042–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, J. R. (1994). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20, 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards, J. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellard, J. H., Miller, C. D., Baumle, T., & Olson, J. M. (2002). Just world processes in demonizing. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 350–362). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Enright, R. D., & The Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewritz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L, Jr, Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 664–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flanigan, B. (1992). Forgiving the unforgivable. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 823–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friedman, H. S., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1987). Personality, type A behavior, and coronary heart disease: The role of emotional expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. (2010). And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 624–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational justice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guo, J., Rupp, D. E., Weiss, H. W., & Trougakos, J. P. (2011). Justice in organizations: A person-centric perspective. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics (Vol. 7, pp. 3–32). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Harris, A. H. S., & Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Forgiveness, unforgiveness, health and disease. In E. L. Worthington Jr (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 321–333). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470.Google Scholar
  39. Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2013). Integrating organizational justice and affect: New insights, challenges, and opportunities. Social Justice Research, 26, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2004). Back to caring after being hurt: The role of forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kivimaki, M., Elovainio, M., Vahetera, J., & Ferrie, J. E. (2003). Organizational justice and health of employees: Prospective cohort study. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 60, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lamb, S. (2002). Women, abuse, and forgiveness: A special case. In S. Lamb & J. G. Murphy (Eds.), Before forgiving: Cautionary views on forgiveness in psychotherapy (pp. 155–171). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., Edmondson, K. A., & Jones, W. H. (2005). The unique effects of forgiveness on health: An exploration of pathways. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leach, M. M., Greer, T., & Gaughf, J. (2010). Linguistic analysis of interpersonal forgiveness: Process trajectories. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lepore, S. J., Greenberg, M. A., Bruno, M., & Smyth, J. M. (2002). Expressive writing and health: Self-regulation of emotion-related experience, physiology, and behavior. In S. J. Lepore & J. M. Smyth (Eds.), The writing cure. How expressive writing promotes health and emotional well-being (pp. 99–117). Washington DC: American Psychological.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manuck, S. B., & Krantz, D. S. (1986). Psychophysiologic reactivity in coronary heart disease and essential hypertension. In K. A. Matthews, S. M. Weiss, T. Detre, T. M. Dembrowski, B. Falkner, S. B. Manuck, & R. B. Williams (Eds.), Handbook of stress, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease (pp. 11–34). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Matthews, C. (1988). Hardball: How politics is played—Told by one who knows the game. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  50. McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L, Jr, & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L, Jr, Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 211–244). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  55. Pennebaker, J. W. (1990). Opening up: The healing powers of confiding in others. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  56. Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). Hints on running a writing experiment. Retrieved January 26, 2004, from
  58. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997a). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  59. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997b). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2007). Expressive writing, emotional upheavals, and health. In H. Friedman & R. Silver (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 263–284). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Pennebaker, J. W., Colder, M., & Sharp, L. K. (1990). Accelerating the coping process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Computer software]. Austin, TX: Scholar
  65. Pugh, S. D., Skarlicki, D. P., & Passell, B. S. (2003). After the fall: Layoff victims’ trust and cynicism in re-employment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Riek, B. M., & Mania, E. W. (2012). The antecedents and consequences of interpersonal forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Personal Relationships, 19, 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rivkin, I. D., Gustafson, J., Weingarten, I., & Chin, D. (2006). The effects of expressive writing on adjustment to HIV. AIDS and Behavior, 10, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Romero, C. (2008). Writing wrongs: Promoting forgiveness through expressive writing. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenberg, H. J., Rosenberg, S. D., Ernstoff, M. S., Wolford, G. L., Amdur, R. J., Elshamy, M. R., et al. (2002). Expressive disclosure and health outcomes in a prostate cancer population. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 32, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Jones, K. S., & Liao, H. (2014). The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the “wheels” already invented and the voices of the injustice victims. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. (2004a). Taking pen to hand: Evaluating theories underlying the written disclosure paradigm. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 121–137.Google Scholar
  74. Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. (2004b). A closer examination of the written disclosure paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spera, S. P., Buhrfeind, E. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). Expressive writing and coping with job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 722–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Steptoe, A. (1993). Stress and the cardiovascular system: A psychosocial perspective. In S. C. Stanford & P. Salmon (Eds.), Stress: From synapse to syndrome (pp. 119–141). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  79. Stone, M. (2002). Forgiveness in the workplace. Industrial and Commerical Training, 34, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Struthers, C. W., Dupuis, R., & Eaton, J. (2005). Promoting forgiveness among co-workers following a workplace transgression: The effects of social motivation training. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 983–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (1997). What’s good about revenge: The avenger’s perspective. In R. J. Lewicki, R. J. Bies, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 145–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  84. Ullrich, P. M., & Lutgendorf, S. K. (2002). Journaling about stressful events: Effects of cognitive processing and emotional expression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vas, S. N. (2002). Expressive writing about interpersonal offenses: Effects on forgiveness and health. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.Google Scholar
  86. Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. (2003). Overcoming interpersonal offenses: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness? Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wade, N. G., Bailey, D. C., & Shaffer, P. (2005). Helping clients heal: Does forgiveness make a difference? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wallace, H., Exline, J., & Baumeister, R. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). On the relationship between justice and forgiveness: Are all forms of justice made equal? British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 463–483.Google Scholar
  91. Wiesenthal, S. (1998). The sunflower: On the possibilities and limits of forgiveness. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  92. Witvliet, C. V. O., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 12, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Worthington, E. L, Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York: Brunner/Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Worthington, E. L, Jr, & Wade, N. G. (1999). The social psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 358–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Worthington, E. L, Jr, Sandage, S. J., & Berry, J. W. (2000). Group interventions to promote forgiveness: What researchers and clinicians ought to know. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 228–253). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations