Gender and Ethnic Diversity on Boards and Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Arts Sector
- 1.4k Downloads
This study provides insights on sector-specific characteristics, challenges and issues that affect corporate responsibility (CR) in relation to ethnicity and gender on arts boards. Using stakeholder theory, the study explores how arts board composition (e.g. gender and ethnicity) sets the scene for dynamics that affect CR. Data analysis is based on interviews with 92 board members and stakeholders sitting on 66 arts boards in Australia. Results suggest that the dynamism of gender and ethnic diversity on arts boards makes them responsive to CR; however, their presence does not always lead to CR. For diverse boards to lead to CR, our findings indicate the significance of board member attributes of passion, skill and capability of developing networks, irrespective of gender and ethnicity. The article advances understanding of the implications and relevance of ethnic and gender diversity on non-profit boards and contributes to an important yet under-researched body of literature.
KeywordsArts Boards Corporate responsibility Diversity Ethnicity Gender
- Adams, R.B., Gray, S. & Nowland, J. (2011). Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved November 2, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1953152.
- Ames, P. (1985). Guiding museum values: Trustees, missions and plans. Museum News, pp. 48–54.Google Scholar
- Attorney-General’s Department (2011). Creative industries, a strategy for 21st century Australia. Attorney-General’s Department, Ministry for the Arts, Government of Australia, Retrieved from http://arts.gov.au/creative.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009). Not-for-profit Organisations, Australia, 2006–2007 (Re-Issue). ABS, cat. No. 8106.0. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/8106.0.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Cultural diversity in Australia: reflecting a nation: Stories from 2011 census. ABS, cat. No. 2071.0. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2071.0.
- Australian Institute of Company Directors (2011). Directors Social Impact Study AICD and Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theories, models and findings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Beschorner, T., Hajduk, T., & Simeonov, S. (2013). Corporate responsibility in Europe: Government involvement in sector-specific initiatives. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
- Bodenhausen, G. V. (2010). Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Deloitte (2012). Survey into the Not-for-Profit Sector 2012—Fundraising, Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com.
- Desvaux, G., Devillard, S. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2010a). Women matter 2010: Women at the top of corporations: Making it happen (pp. 1–22). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
- Desvaux, G., Devillard, S. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2010b). Women matter 3: Women leaders, a competitive edge in and after the crisis (pp. 1–22). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
- Devillard, S., Graven, W., Lawson, E., Paradise, R. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2012). Women matter 2012: Making the Breakthrough (pp. 1–26). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
- Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
- Kendall, E. K., & Kendall, E. J. (2002). Systems analysis and design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lindgreen, A., Kotler, P., Maon, F., & Vanhamme, J. (Eds.). (2012). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: Pressures, conflicts, and reconciliation. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
- MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrad, C. (2004). Giving your organization SPIRIT: An overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance, corporate reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30(2), 15–42.Google Scholar
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Patton, M.Q. & Cochran, M. (2002). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Paris: Médecins Sans Frontières.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 76–92.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission (2010). Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector Research Report. Productivity Commission Research Report, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- Rentschler, R. (2002). The entrepreneurial arts leader: Cultural policy, change and reinvention. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
- Rentschler, R. (2015). Arts governance: People, passion, performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rentschler, R., & Radbourne, J. (2008). Performance and Conformance of Victorian Arts Boards. Melbourne: Report for Arts Victoria.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, L. (2012). Nonprofit Corporate Governance: The Board’s Role. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulations. Retrieved from http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/04/15/nonprofit-corporate-governance-the-boards-role/.
- Saldana, J. (2008). Coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Salt, B. (2014). More indecent obsession. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
- Sealy, R., Doldor, E. & Vinnicombe, S. (2009). Increasing diversity on public and private sector boards-Part 1. International Centre for Women Leaders, Cranfield School of Management, Government Equalities Office, London.Google Scholar
- Turbide, J., Laurin, C., Lapierre, L., & Morrissette, R. (2008). Financial crises in the arts: Is governance the illness or the cure? International Journal of Arts Management, 10(2), 5–13.Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorisation theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 233–275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar