Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 317–336 | Cite as

Gender and Ethnic Diversity on Boards and Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Arts Sector

  • Fara AzmatEmail author
  • Ruth Rentschler


This study provides insights on sector-specific characteristics, challenges and issues that affect corporate responsibility (CR) in relation to ethnicity and gender on arts boards. Using stakeholder theory, the study explores how arts board composition (e.g. gender and ethnicity) sets the scene for dynamics that affect CR. Data analysis is based on interviews with 92 board members and stakeholders sitting on 66 arts boards in Australia. Results suggest that the dynamism of gender and ethnic diversity on arts boards makes them responsive to CR; however, their presence does not always lead to CR. For diverse boards to lead to CR, our findings indicate the significance of board member attributes of passion, skill and capability of developing networks, irrespective of gender and ethnicity. The article advances understanding of the implications and relevance of ethnic and gender diversity on non-profit boards and contributes to an important yet under-researched body of literature.


Arts Boards Corporate responsibility Diversity Ethnicity Gender 


  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R.B., Gray, S. & Nowland, J. (2011). Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved November 2, from
  3. Ames, P. (1985). Guiding museum values: Trustees, missions and plans. Museum News, pp. 48–54.Google Scholar
  4. Attorney-General’s Department (2011). Creative industries, a strategy for 21st century Australia. Attorney-General’s Department, Ministry for the Arts, Government of Australia, Retrieved from
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009). Not-for-profit Organisations, Australia, 2006–2007 (Re-Issue). ABS, cat. No. 8106.0. Retrieved from
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Cultural diversity in Australia: reflecting a nation: Stories from 2011 census. ABS, cat. No. 2071.0. Retrieved from
  7. Australian Institute of Company Directors (2011). Directors Social Impact Study AICD and Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Ayuso, S., Arino, A. M., & Garcia-Castro, R. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders’ interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Business and Society, 53(3), 414–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azmat, F. (2013). Opportunities or obstacles? Understanding the challenges faced by migrant women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theories, models and findings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beschorner, T., Hajduk, T., & Simeonov, S. (2013). Corporate responsibility in Europe: Government involvement in sector-specific initiatives. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  12. Bhimani, A., & Soonawalla, K. (2005). From conformance to performance: The corporate responsibilities continuum. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(3), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bodenhausen, G. V. (2010). Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  14. Brannen, M. Y., & Thomas, D. C. (2010). Bicultural individuals in organizations: Implications and opportunity. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, W. A., & Guo, C. (2010). Exploring the key roles for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Review, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapple, L., & Humphrey, Y. J. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collinson, D. L. (1992). Managing the shop floor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, J., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornforth, C. (2012). Non-profit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deloitte (2012). Survey into the Not-for-Profit Sector 2012Fundraising, Deloitte. Retrieved from
  22. Desvaux, G., Devillard, S. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2010a). Women matter 2010: Women at the top of corporations: Making it happen (pp. 1–22). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
  23. Desvaux, G., Devillard, S. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2010b). Women matter 3: Women leaders, a competitive edge in and after the crisis (pp. 1–22). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Devillard, S., Graven, W., Lawson, E., Paradise, R. & Sancier-Sultan, S. (2012). Women matter 2012: Making the Breakthrough (pp. 1–26). New York: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
  25. Dickenson, V. (1991). An inquiry into the relationship between museum boards and management. Curator, 34(4), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Du Plessis, J., O’Sullivan, J., & Rentschler, R. (2014). Multiple layers of gender diversity on corporate boards: To force or not to force? Deakin Law Review, 19(1), 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emanuele, R., & Higgins, S. H. (2000). Corporate culture in the non-profit sector: A comparison of fringe benefits with the for-profit sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fasick, F. A. (2001). Some uses of untranscribed tape recordings in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(4), 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fitzsimmons, T. W., Callan, V. J., & Paulsen, N. (2014). Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top?. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fondas, N. (2000). Women on boards of directors: Gender bias or power threat? In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 171–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  34. Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffin, D., & Abraham, M. (2000). The effective management of museums: Cohesive leadership and visitor-focused public programming. Museum Management and Curatorship, 18(4), 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Han, J., Han, J., & Brass, D. J. (2014). Human capital diversity in the creation of social capital for team creativity. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 35(1), 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local non-profit organizations—A local study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, G. S., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, D. A. (2013). Board composition beyond independence social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kendall, E. K., & Kendall, E. J. (2002). Systems analysis and design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Lindgreen, A., Kotler, P., Maon, F., & Vanhamme, J. (Eds.). (2012). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: Pressures, conflicts, and reconciliation. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  46. MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrad, C. (2004). Giving your organization SPIRIT: An overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance, corporate reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30(2), 15–42.Google Scholar
  47. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. McElhaney, K. (2009). Approach to corporate social responsibility. Leader to Leader, 52(1), 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, T., & Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. M. (2010). Moving governance research forward: A contingency-based framework and data application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patton, M.Q. & Cochran, M. (2002). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Paris: Médecins Sans Frontières.Google Scholar
  54. Poland, B. D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 76–92.Google Scholar
  56. Productivity Commission (2010). Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector Research Report. Productivity Commission Research Report, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  57. Radbourne, J. (2003). Performing on boards: The link between governance and corporate reputation in non-profit arts boards. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reid, W., & Turbide, J. (2012). Board/staff relationships in a growth crisis: Implications for non-profit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rentschler, R. (2002). The entrepreneurial arts leader: Cultural policy, change and reinvention. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rentschler, R. (2015). Arts governance: People, passion, performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Rentschler, R., & Radbourne, J. (2008). Performance and Conformance of Victorian Arts Boards. Melbourne: Report for Arts Victoria.Google Scholar
  62. Rosenthal, L. (2012). Nonprofit Corporate Governance: The Board’s Role. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulations. Retrieved from
  63. Saldana, J. (2008). Coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Salt, B. (2014). More indecent obsession. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sealy, R., Doldor, E. & Vinnicombe, S. (2009). Increasing diversity on public and private sector boards-Part 1. International Centre for Women Leaders, Cranfield School of Management, Government Equalities Office, London.Google Scholar
  66. Sheridan, A., Haslam, F., & Still, L. (2011). Complex and contradictory: The doing of gender on regional development boards. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(3), 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steane, P., & Christie, M. (2001). Nonprofit boards in Australia: A distinctive governance approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Syed, J., & Kramar, R. (2009). What is the Australian model for managing cultural diversity? Personnel Review, 39(1), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tadmor, C. T., Tetlock, P. E., & Peng, K. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turbide, J., Laurin, C., Lapierre, L., & Morrissette, R. (2008). Financial crises in the arts: Is governance the illness or the cure? International Journal of Arts Management, 10(2), 5–13.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorisation theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 233–275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Urice, J. (1990). Not-for-profit arts trustees: Report of a national sample. Journal of Cultural Economics, 14(2), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vallerand, R. J., Paquet, Y., Philippe, F. L., & Charest, J. (2010). On the role of passion for work in burnout: A process model. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 218–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations