Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 351–366 | Cite as

Financial Management Effectiveness and Board Gender Diversity in Member-Governed, Community Financial Institutions

  • Anne Marie WardEmail author
  • John Forker
Article

Abstract

Although non-profit organisations typically have high representation of females on their boards, relatively little is known about the effects of gender diversity in these organisations particularly in relation to financial management. In this archival study, resource dependency theory and agency analysis are combined to provide theoretical insight and empirical analysis of gender diversity on effective financial management in member-governed, community financial institutions. The investigation is possible due to the unique characteristics of the organisational form and region being examined—credit unions in Northern Ireland. The sector has not been subject to external regulation on board gender, yet a wide array of gender mix on boards ranging from 100 % male to 100 % female are in existence. In addition, effective financial management is crucial to their survival and their ability to meet member objectives. Boards with higher female representation exhibit superior financial management first, in respect of loan book quality in the period of austerity following the financial crisis and second when measured against return on assets.

Keywords

Agency Credit unions Financial management Gender diversity Governance Non-profits Resource dependence theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support provided by the Irish Accounting Education Trust (Chartered Accountants Ireland) and for the very helpful comments received from three anonymous reviewers, from Barry Reilly and Catherine Seierstad, from seminar participants when the paper was presented at the Universities of Ulster and Sussex and from conference participants at the 2013 conferences of the British Accounting and Finance Association, the Academy of Management, the Irish Accounting and Finance Association and the EIASM 9th Workshop on Challenges in Managing the Third Sector.

References

  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62, 217–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, R., Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 58–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, R., de Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & van Ees, H. (2015). Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali, M., Ng, Y. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amel, D. F., & Prager, R. A. (2014). Community bank performance: How important are managers., Finance and economics discussion series Washington, DC: Division of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board.Google Scholar
  7. Andrés-Alonso, P., Azofra-Palenzuela, V., & Romero-Merino, E. (2009). Determinants of nonprofit board size and composition: The case of Spanish foundations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 784–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barron, D. N., West, E., & Hannon, M. T. (1994). A time to grow and a time to die: growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 381–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F419–F436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationship among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1996). Women on boards of nonprofits: What difference do they make? Non-profit Management and Leadership, 6(3), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in non-profit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2003). Board composition, committees, and organizational efficiency: The case of nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2010). The contextual impact of nonprofit board composition and structure on organizational performance: Agency and resource dependence perspectives. Voluntas, 21(1), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, L. (2004). Membership incentives: Factors affecting individuals’ decisions about participation in athletics-related professional associations. Journal of Sport Management, 18(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conry, J. C., & McDonald, J. E. (1994). Moving towards a matrix: Gender and the nonprofit culture of the nineties. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 5, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coombes, S. M., Morris, M. H., Allen, J. A., & Webb, J. W. (2011). Behavioural orientations of non-profit boards as a factor in entrepreneurial performance: Does governance matter? Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Croteau, J. T. (1963). The economics of the Credit Union. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, M. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, K. (2007). Australian credit unions and the demutualization agenda. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78(2), 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dekker, P., & van den Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9(1), 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunn, P. (2012). The role of gender and human capital on the appointment of new corporate directors to boardroom committees: Canadian evidence. International Business Research, 5(5), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  30. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferreira, D. (2010). Board diversity. In R. Anderson & H. K. Baker (Eds.), Corporate Governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–242). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Forker, J. J., & Ward, A. M. (2012). Prudence and financial self-regulation in credit unions in Northern Ireland. The British Accounting Review, 44(4), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Forker, J. J., Grosvold, J., & Ward, A. M. (2014). Management models and priorities in member associations: Is credit unions’ community involvement crowded-out? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2S), 105S–123S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.Google Scholar
  38. Hartarska, V., & Nadolnyak, D. (2012). Board size and diversity as governance mechanisms in community development loan funds in the USA. Applied Economics, 44(33), 4313–4329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heinrich, J., & Kashian, R. (2008). Credit union to mutual conversion: Do interest rates converge? Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(1), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: effectiveness in local nonprofit organisations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hillier, D., Hodgson, A., Stevenson-Clarke, P., & Lhaopadchan, S. (2008). Accounting window dressing and template regulation: A case study of the Australian credit union industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependency role of corporate directors: Strategic adoption of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A, Jr, & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87.Google Scholar
  47. ILCU (2010). Standard rules for credit unions (Northern Ireland). Dublin: ILCU.Google Scholar
  48. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kesner, I. F. (1988). Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kupiec, P. & Lee, Y. (2012). What factors explain differences in return on assets among community banks? Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC (working paper).Google Scholar
  51. Landrum, N. (2007). Advancing the ‘base of the pyramid’ debate. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics and organisational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.Google Scholar
  53. Luckerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Luis-Carnicer, P., Martínez-Sánchez, A., Pérez-Pérez, M., & Vela-Jiménez, M. J. (2008). Gender diversity in management: Curvilinear relationships to reconcile findings. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(8), 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mallin, C. A. (2010). Corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. McKillop, D. G., Briscoe, R., McCarthy, O., & Ward, M. (2003). Irish credit unions: Exploring the gender mix. International Journal of Voluntary and Non-Profit Organisations, 14(3), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McKillop, D. G., Glass, C., & Ward, A. M. (2005). Cost efficiency, environmental influences and UK credit unions, 1991 to 2001. Managerial Finance, 31(11), 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McKillop, D. G., Goth, P., & Hyndman, N. (2006). Credit unions in Ireland: Structure performance and governance. Dublin: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland.Google Scholar
  59. McKillop, D. G., Ward, A. M., & Wilson, J. (2010). The good, the bad and the ugly: A discussion of the impact of regulatory reform on the UK credit union sector. Edinburgh, Scotland: SATER (The Scottish Accountancy Trust for Education and Research).Google Scholar
  60. Midgley, J. (2006). Gendered economies: Transferring private gender roles into the public realm through rural community development. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller-Millesen, J. L. (2003). Understanding the behaviour of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niederkohr, K. & Ikeda, J. (2005). Credit union governance: White paper. WOCCU, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  63. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. M. (2010). Moving governance research forward: A contingency-based framework and data application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1261–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on US Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  68. Reddy, K., Locke, S., & Fauzi, F. (2013). Relevance of corporate governance practices in charitable organisations: A case study of registered charities in New Zealand. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 9(2), 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shaiko, R. G. (1997). Female participation in association governance and political representation: Women as executive directors, board members, lobbyists and political action committee directors. Non-Profit Management and Leadership, 8(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shrader, C., Blackburn, V., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Issues, 9(3), 355–372.Google Scholar
  73. Siciliano, J. L. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organisational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 1313–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Silverman, I. W. (2003). Gender difference in delay of gratification: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stone, M. M., & Ostrower, F. (2007). Acting in the public interest? Another look at governance research in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Themudo, N. S. (2009). Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Integrating agency theory with stakeholder and stewardship theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ward, A. M., & McKillop, D. G. (2005). An investigation into the link between UK credit union characteristics, location and their success. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76(3), 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  81. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wiseman, R. M., Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. WOCCU. (2013). Statistical report 2013. World Council of Credit Unions website. Retrieved Oct 20, 2014 from http://www.woccu.org.
  84. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors’. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Ulster Business SchoolUlster UniversityAntrimUK
  2. 2.School of Business, Management and EconomicsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations