Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 455–476 | Cite as

The Effect of Environmental Activism on the Long-run Market Value of a Company: A Case Study



This paper investigates the impact of activism on a large, powerful corporation in Tasmania. Gunns Ltd was a large woodchip processor in Tasmania that fought a long-running battle with environmental activists regarding Gunns’ logging and processing activities. The study focuses on events in 2004–2005, when Gunns applied to build a pulp mill in rural northern Tasmania and began a legal case against activists. The research question is whether there is clear statistical evidence that these events were important, as is widely believed, in the ultimate failure of Gunns in (Annual Report 2011, Gunns Ltd, Tasmania, available from: [11/04/14]), just 6 years after being the largest and one of the most financially successful Tasmanian companies. We use a mixed methods approach that combines a detailed narrative informed by theory, to examine issues of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical behaviour, with an econometric time series analysis of the impact of activism on the market value of Gunns. Our analysis supports the contention that the events in 2004–2005 played a significant part in the decline of the long-run market value of Gunns over the subsequent period, through to its failure in 2011. We discuss the underlying causes for Gunns’ failure in terms of agency, stakeholder, legitimacy and leadership theories. Research frequently assesses effects such as those in the Gunns’ case through solely qualitative means. This paper integrates a quantitative analysis into a detailed qualitative narrative and theoretical interpretation of events, to provide additional precision to its findings. It contributes to research in CSR and the impact of activism.


Activism Corporate social responsibility Gunns Mixed methods Ethical management Error correction modelling 



Australian Bureau of Statistics


Augmented Dickey-Fuller


Autoregressive distributed Lag model


Australian stock exchange


Corporate social responsibility


Error correction model


Error correction term


Global financial crisis


Resource planning and development commission


Tap into a better Tasmania


Tasmanian wilderness society


Victorian supreme court


  1. ABC News. (2005). Gunns denies green campaign caused profit drop, ABC News 27 August, Available from [24/04/15].
  2. ABC News. (2006). Gunns drops major legal claim, ABC News 17 August, Available from [24/04/15].
  3. ABC News. (2008). Financial Crisis may sink Gunns pulp mill, ABC News 28 October, Available from [23/04/15].
  4. ABC News. (2012). Gunns extends trading halt, ABC News 26 March, Available from [23/04/15].
  5. ABC News. (2013). Former Gunns Pulp Mill on the Market, ABC News 5 November, Available from [23/04/15].
  6. Aitken, W. (2011). The pulp mill and the air. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 176–198). Launceston: Pencil pine Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ajani, J. (2008). Australia’s transition from native forests to plantations: The implications for woodchips, pulp mills, tax breaks and climate change, Agenda. A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 15(3), 21–38.Google Scholar
  8. Alexander, D. R., Falta, M., & Willett, R. J. (2012). Using forecasting criteria to identify value relevance in the relationship between accounting numbers and market value. Abacus, 48, 316–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrews, A. (2012). $904 m loss: Gunns relies on banks to survive, The Examiner 1 September, Available from [23/04/15].
  10. Angle, M. (2001). Tas sawmill giant buys North Forest products, The World Today 20 March, Available from [27/04/15].
  11. Baillie, R., & Bollerslev, T. (1994). Cointegration, fractional cointegration and exchange rate dynamic. Journal of Finance, 49(2), 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barr, L., & Barr, N. (1994). Leadership development. Austin: Eakin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bass, B. (2008). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: theory, research & managerial applications (4th ed.), New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Baxter, T., & Browne, R. (2009). Probity issues connected with the Tasmanian pulp mill, Paper presented to the Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption (APSAC) Conference July28–31. Available from [27/04/15].
  15. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (2011). Modelling dynamics in time-series-cross-section-data political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beeson, A. (2010). The Gunns 20 case: A brief history. National Environmental Law Review, 18, 51–53.Google Scholar
  17. Boyce, G. (2000). Public discourse and decision making: Exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance, 14(6), 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brennan, N., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brunton, R. (1996). The Hindmarsh island bridge: And the credibility of Australian anthropology. Anthropology Today, 12(4), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buckman, G. (2008). Tasmania’s wilderness battles: A history. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chow, G. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591–605.Google Scholar
  24. Cica, N. (2005). Middle-ground views are up against battleground tactics, The Sydney Morning Herald 7 April, Available from [30 May 2014].
  25. Cohen, J., Krishnamurthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2004). Corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 87–152.Google Scholar
  26. Colbeck, R. (2012). Gunns Collapsewho wins in the games Greens play?, Sen. Richard Colbeck Media Release 25 September, Available from [30 March 2015].
  27. Contreras, K. S., & Siegal, D. S. (2009). A case study of the strategic use of CSR: the American Gaming association and the national center for responsible Gaming. In C. A. Mallin (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility: A case study approach (pp. 177–193). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation, and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crowley, K. (2003). Saving the Franklin: A people’s rebellion in a distant forest. Island, 93(94), 34–43.Google Scholar
  31. Curran, G., & Hollander, R. (2011). The Wesley Vale Pulp Mill Proposal and its aftermath. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 37–56). Launceston: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dahya, J., McConnell, J. J., & Travlos, N. G. (2002). The Cadbury Committee, corporate performance, and top management turnover. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dargusch, P. (2008). Understandings of sustainable corporate governance by Australian Managed Investment Schemes and some implications for small-scale forestry in Australia. Small-Scale Forestry, 7(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Denholm, M., & Main, A. (2011). Ex-Gunns boss John Gay faces insider trade charges, The Australian Newspaper, 17 August, Available from [30 May 2014].
  35. Dierkes, M., & Antal, A. B. (1985). The usefulness and use of social reporting information. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927–939.Google Scholar
  37. Duncan, M. (2011). The Pulp Mill and habitat loss. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 135–154). Launceston: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  38. Durr, R. H. (1992). An essay on cointegration and error correction models. Political Analysis, 4, 185–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Edwards, N. (2006). Too much risk for the rewardan analysis of the pulp mill returns to the people of Tasmania, Submission 114 to the RPDC.Google Scholar
  40. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  41. Elsbach, K. (2003). Organizational perception management. Research In Organizational Behavior, 25(25), 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007.Google Scholar
  43. Flanagan, M. (2004). The sorry state of Tasmania. The Age Newspaper 14 March, Available from [11/12/14].
  44. Flanagan, R. (2007). Out of control: The tragedy of Tasmania’s forests, The Monthly, May 2007, Available from [30/04/15].
  45. Ford, S. (2013). New call for pulp mill at Hampshire, The Advocate, 6 Nov, Available from [11/12/14].
  46. Forster, J. (2010). The global financial crisis: Implications for Australasian business. QLD: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Frame, C. (2006). Gunns Ltd pulp mill proposal: Latest development, In: Proceedings of 2006 Australian forest growers conference, Launceston.Google Scholar
  48. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
  50. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A., & Parmer, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘The corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits, New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, Available from [11/12/14].
  53. Gale, F. (2008). Tasmania’s Tamar Valley Pulp Mill: A comparison of planning processes using a good environmental governance framework. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(3), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gale, F. (2011a). A review of the environmental assessment of Gunns’ proposed mill. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 305–322). Launceston: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  55. Gale, F. (2011b). Is the Tasmanian forest agreement collapsing?, The Conversation, Available from [3/11/14].
  56. Gale, F. (2011c). Planning Tasmania’s Tamar Valley Pulp Mill. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 57–78). Launceston: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  57. Gale, F. (2013). When interests trump institutions: Tasmania’s forest policy network and the Bell Bay pulp mill. Environmental Politics, 22(2), 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gay, J. (2005). “Chairman’s Report”, Gunns Annual Report, Gunns Ltd, Tasmania, Available from: [11/04/14].
  59. Geography of Kamloops. (2013). Kamloops Tourism, Available at [11/12/14].
  60. Gibson, K., & O’Donovan, G. (2011). The Pulp Mill and business. In Pencil Pine (Ed.), Pulp friction, Gale (pp. 79–100). Launceston: Press.Google Scholar
  61. Gray, R. (2010). It’s mostly the Greens’ fault, says Robin Gray, Tasmanian Times, Available from [11/12/13].
  62. Gunns. (2004). Annual Report 2004, Gunns Ltd, Tasmania, Available from [11/04/14].
  63. Gunns. (2005). Annual Report 2005, Gunns Ltd, Tasmania, Available from [11/04/14].
  64. Gunns. (2011), Annual Report 2011, Gunns Ltd, Tasmania, Available from [11/04/14].
  65. Gunns. (2012) 2012 Preliminary Final Report, Australian Stock Exchange 30 August, Available from [10/03//14].
  66. Gunns. (2012a). Gunns: Our History, Gunns Ltd, Available from [10/03//14].
  67. Gunns Statement of Claim. (2005). Gunns Limited and Ors v Alexander Marr and Or et al.,Victorian Supreme Court, VIC.Google Scholar
  68. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.Google Scholar
  69. Hall, G. (2012). Permits can be bought by other agents, The Examiner Newspaper 26 September, Available from [11/12/13].
  70. Hanson, D., & Wickham, M. (2009). How should small shareholders have a voice? Lessons from Gunns Ltd extraordinary general meeting. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(1), 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Harding, R., Hendricks, C., & Faruqi, N. (2009). Environmental decision-making: Exploring complexity and context. Annandale: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  72. Harvey, A. C. (1990). The econometric analysis of time series. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2013). The new psychology of leadership. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  74. Hawking, K., & Hunter, B. (1993). The response of business to social regulation in England and Wales. Law and Policy, 15, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hay, P. (1998). Green Politics in the system: Assessing the obstacles to the labor/green power sharing. In J. Pakuski & S. Crooks (Eds.), Ebbing of the green tide? Environmentalism, public opinion and the media. Tas: University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  76. Hendry, D. (1995). Dynamic econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hendry, D. F., & Doornik, J. A. (2001). Empirical econometric modelling using PCGive. England: Timberlake.Google Scholar
  78. Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioral perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. ITS Global. (2007). Review of the Social and Economic Benefits of the Gunns Limited Pulp Mill Project, Department of Environment, Available from [11/12/13].
  80. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jamieson, A. (2011). The pulp: The rise and fall of an industry. Tasmania: Forty Degrees South Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  82. Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  83. Klasson, A. (2013). Labour council calls on city council to take a stand on Ajax mine, Kamloops this week 14 December, Available at[24/05/14].
  84. Lennon, P. (2004). Development of a Pulp Mill (Premier Ministerial Statement), Parliament of Tasmania, Available from: [11/12/13].
  85. Levine, P., & Boaks, J. (2014). What does ethics have to do with leadership? Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lidsky, L. (2000). Silencing John Doe: Defamation & discourse in cyberspace. Duke Law Journal, 49(4), 855–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Long, B., & Driscoll, C. (2008). Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lyons, B. (1998). All Gunns Blazing: J & T Gunn and the development of Launceston. Launceston: Self-Published.Google Scholar
  89. Macintosh, A., & Stokes, M. (2010). Tasmania and the Gunns Pulp Mill. In T. Bonyhady & A. Macintosh (Eds.), Mills, mines and other controversies (pp. 16–59). NSW: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  90. Manning, P. (2011). The felling of Gunns, The Age Newspapers 12 March, p. 7.Google Scholar
  91. Maurice Blackman. (2011). Gunns—class action’, Maurice Blackburn Solicitors, Available from–class-action.aspx [30/05/2014].
  92. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  93. Nathan, S., & Pierce, C. (2009). CSR in Islamic financial institutions in the Middle East. In C. A. Mallin, (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility: A case study approach (pp. 258–273). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  94. Neales, S. (2011). Groups firm against pulp mill, The Mercury Newspaper 16 March, Available from [30/05/14].
  95. Neilson, D., & Flynn, R. (2006). The international pulpwood resource and trade review. New Zealand: DANA Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 15(3), 344–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. O’Donovan, G., & Gibson, K. (2010). Pulp, politics, process and pollution: gunns ltd and the tamar valley pulp mill. In C. A. Mallin (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility: A case study approach. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  98. Ogilvie, F. (2013). Former Gunns head John Gay pleads guilty to insider trading, The World Today 11 December, Available from [30/05/14].
  99. Ogle, G. (2009). Gagged: The Gunns 20 and other Law Suits. Canterbury: Envirobooks.Google Scholar
  100. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Phillips, R., Freeman, R., & Wicks, A. (2003). What Stakeholder Theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. PM. (2004). Gunns to sue Conservationists, ABC PM 12 December, Available from [30/05/14].
  103. Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification error in classical linear least squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodologies), 31, 350–371.Google Scholar
  104. Sorokina, A, Gordon, C., & Matveev, A. (2009). The effects of the GFC on the Russian Banking Sector, Working Paper Series of the 22nd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference, Rochester.Google Scholar
  105. Stokes, M. (2011). Environmental assessment in Tasmania: The resources management and planning system. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp Friction (pp. 101–132). Launceston: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  106. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  107. Swales, P. (2010). Gunns 20 reaches a final settlement. Alternative Law Journal, 35(1), 39.Google Scholar
  108. Tashman, P., & Raelin, J. (2013). Who and what really matters to the firm: Moving stakeholder salience beyond managerial perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. The Age. (2006). Gunns, greenies and the law, The Age Newspaper 29 August, Available from [30/05/14].
  110. Timmons, H. (2005). Britain faulted over McDonald’s libel case, The New York Times 16 February, Available from [30/05/14].
  111. TWS. (2010). The Pulp mill and the forest, The Wilderness Society, Available from [30/05/14].
  112. Vick, D. W., & Campbell, K. (2001). Public protests, private lawsuits, and the market: The investor response to the McLibel case. Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), 204–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Victoria Supreme Court. (2005). Gunns Limited v Marr [2005] VSC 251, Victorian Supreme Court 18 July, Available from [30/05/14].
  114. Vince, M. (2011). The Pulp Mill and the sea. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 155–175). Tasmania: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  115. Warnes, P. (2012). Gunns enters administration, The Mercury Newspaper 26 August, Available from [30/05/14].
  116. Wells, G. (2011). The pulp mill: an economic assessment. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 224–246). Tasmania: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar
  117. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometricia, 48, 817–838.Google Scholar
  118. White, R. (2011). The right to dissent: the Gunns 20 legal case. In F. Gale (Ed.), Pulp friction (pp. 79–100). Tasmania: Pencil Pine Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tasmanian School of Business & EconomicUniversity of TasmaniaLauncestonAustralia
  2. 2.Tasmanian School of Business & EconomicUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations